The extant literature on brand love lacks appraisal of theories and discourse on the conceptualizations of brand love. This work differentiates these conceptualizations, categorizes in three mutually exclusive forms, and labels as perfect two-way love, imperfect two-way love, and perfect one-way love.
AroK.SuomiK.SaraniemiS. (2018). Antecedents and consequences of destination brand love—A case study from Finnish Lapland. Tourism Management, 67, 71–81.
2.
BairradaC. M.CoelhoF.CoelhoA. (2018). Antecedents and outcomes of brand love: Utilitarian and symbolic brand qualities. European Journal of Marketing, 52, 656–682.
3.
BatraR.AhuviaA.BagozziR. P. (2012). Brand love. Journal of Marketing, 76, 1–16.
4.
CarrollB. A.AhuviaA. C. (2006). Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Marketing Letters, 17, 79–89. doi:10.1007/s11002-006-4219-2
5.
FetscherinM. (2014). What type of relationship do we have with loved brands?Journal of Consumer Marketing, 31, 430–440.
6.
HendrickC.HendrickS. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392–402.
7.
HuberF.MeyerF.SchmidD. A. (2015). Brand love in progress—The interdependence of brand love antecedents in consideration of relationship duration. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24, 567–579.
8.
MasudaM. (2003). Meta-analyses of love scales: Do various love scales measure the same psychological constructs?Japanese Psychological Research, 45, 25–37.
9.
PerseE. M.RubinR. B. (1989). Attribution in social and parasocial relationships. Communication Research, 16, 59–77.
10.
RomaniukJ. (2013). Viewpoint: What’s (brand) love got to do with it?International Journal of Market Research, 55, 185–186.
11.
RomaniukJ. (2015). Tainted love. International Journal of Market Research, 57, 673–675.
12.
SternbergR. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135.
