This article responds to Humphrey Taylor's suggestion (89298) that a history of market research fads should be written. The author has reviewed journal titles over the past 24 years and found that there were fewer fads than expected. Main themes have been: improving data collection methods, improving market research in practice, international research. ‘Faddish’ themes have been mainly ethnography and semiotics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgafonoffN. (2006) Adapting ethnographic research methods to ad hoc commercial market research.Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 9, 2, pp. 115–125.
2.
BanksR. (1997) Is Asia different? Defining a strategy to serve multi-national clients in the region.Marketing and Research Today, 25, 1, pp. 4–11.
3.
BelsonW.A. (1966) The effects of reversing the presentation order of verbal rating scales.Journal of Advertising Research, 6, 4, pp. 30–37.
4.
BoddyC.R. (1996) Project redemption. Researching a new distribution method for fmcg brands in South Korea.Proceedings of the ESOMAR Conference: Marketing in Asia: The Contribution of Research, Hong Kong, November, pp. 275–285.
5.
BoddyC.R. (2005) Projective techniques in market research: valueless subjectivity or insightful reality? A look at the evidence for the usefulness, reliability and validity of projective techniques in market research.International Journal of Market Research, 47, 3, pp. 239–254.
6.
BoddyC.R. (2007) Projective techniques in Taiwan and Asia-Pacific market research.Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 10, 1, pp. 48–62.
7.
BristolT. & FernE. (1996) Exploring the atmosphere created by focus group interviews: comparing consumers’ feelings across qualitative techniques.Journal of the Market Research Society, 38, 2, pp. 185–195.
8.
CobanogluC.WardeB. & MoreoP.J. (2001) A comparison of mail, fax and web-based survey methods.International Journal of Market Research, 43, 4, pp. 441–452.
9.
ColwellJ. (1990) Qualitative market research: a conceptual analysis and review of practitioner criteria.Journal of the Market Research Society, 32, 1, pp. 13–36.
10.
CorrD. & TaylorC. (1996) Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data: unpacking the mysterious.Proceedings of the Market Research Society Annual Conference, Birmingham, 20–22 March, pp. 65–76.
11.
CroftR.BoddyC.R. & PentucciC. (2007) Say what you mean, mean what you say: an ethnographic approach to male and female conversation.International Journal of Market Research, 49, 6, pp. 715–734.
12.
DommeyerC.J. (1988) How form of the monetary incentive affects mail survey response.Journal of the Market Research Society, 30, 3, pp. 379–385.
13.
ElliottR. & Jankel-ElliottN. (2003) Using ethnography in strategic consumer research.Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 6, 4, pp. 215–223.
14.
GriggsS. (1987) Analysing qualitative data.Journal of the Market Research Society, 29, 1, pp. 15–33.
15.
HaireM. (1950) Projective techniques in marketing research.Journal of Marketing, 14, 5, pp. 649–656.
16.
HarveyL. (1987) Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: a comprehensive literature review.Journal of the Market Research Society, 29, 3, pp. 341–353.
17.
HarveyM. & EvansM. (2001) Decoding competitive propositions: a semiotic alternative to traditional advertising research.International Journal of Market Research, 43, 2, pp. 171–187.
18.
HendersonN.R. (1995) A practical approach to analyzing and reporting focus groups studies: lessons from qualitative market research.Qualitative Health Research, 5, 4, pp. 463–477.
19.
HofstedeA.vanHoofJ.WalenbergN. & dejongM. (2007) Projective techniques for brand image research. Two personification-based methods explored.Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 10, 3, pp. 300–309.
20.
HusseyM. & DuncombeN. (1999) Projecting the right image: using projective techniques to measure brand image.Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 2, 1, pp. 22–30.
21.
KaushikM. & SenA. (1990) Semiotics and qualitative research.Journal of the Market Research Society, 32, 2, pp. 227–242.
22.
LewesR. (2002) Demystifying semiotics: some key questions answered.International Journal of Market Research, 44, 3, pp. 252–264.
23.
MariampolskiH. (1988) Ethnography makes comeback as a research tool.Marketing News, 22, p. 32.
24.
MariampolskiH. (1999) The power of ethnography.Journal of the Market Research Society, 41, 1, pp. 75–86.
25.
Maso-FleischmanR. (1996) Ethnographic research smooths Spanish-language ad strategy.Marketing News, 18, p. 6.
26.
McFarlandJ. (2001) Margaret Mead meets consumer fieldwork.Harvard Management Update, 6, 8, p. 5.
27.
McMillanL. & NgB. (2007) Ethnography within consumer research: a critical case study of consumer film festivals.International Journal of Market Research, 49, 6, pp. 707–714.
28.
OhashiT. (1989) Marketing in Japan in the 1990s: homing in on the holonic consumer.Marketing and Research Today, 17, 4, pp. 220–229.
29.
O'ShaughnessyJ. & HolbrookM.B. (1988) Understanding consumer behaviour: the linguistic turn in marketing research.Journal of the Market Research Society, 30, 2, pp. 197–223.
30.
RamseyE.IbbotsonP. & McColeP. (2006) Application of projective techniques in an e-business research context. A response to ‘Projective techniques in market research: valueless subjectivity or insightful reality?'’.International Journal of Market Research, 48, 5, pp. 551–573.
31.
ReidD.J. & ReidF.J.M. (2005) An indepth comparison of computer mediated and conventional focus group discussions.International Journal of Market Research, 47, 2, pp. 131–162.
32.
RobertsonD.H. & JoselynR.W. (1974) Projective techniques in research.Journal of Advertising Research, 14, 5, pp. 27–31.
33.
RobinsonC. (1996) Asian culture: the marketing consequences.Journal of the Market Research Society, 38, 1, pp. 55–62.
34.
RobsonS. & WardleJ. (1988) Who's watching whom? A study of the effects of observers on group discussions.Journal of the Market Research Society, 30, 3, pp. 333–359.
35.
SchindlerR.M. (1992) The real lesson of new Coke: the value of focus groups for predicting the effects of social influence.Marketing Research, 4, 4, pp. 22–27.
36.
SchoutenJ.W. & McAlexanderJ.H. (1995) Subcultures of consumption: an ethnography of the new bikers.Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 1, pp. 43–61.
37.
SpeeceM. (1998) Value orientation among Asian middle class consumers.Marketing and Research Today, 27, 4, pp. 156–165.
38.
SteeleH.S. (1990) Marketing research in China: the Hong Kong connection.Marketing and Research Today, 18, 3, pp. 155–165.
39.
SweenyJ.C.SoutarD.HausknechtD.R.DallinR.F. & JohnsonL.W. (1997) Collecting information from groups: a comparison of two methods.Journal of the Market Research Society, 39, 2, pp. 397–411.
40.
SykesW. (1990) Validity and reliability in qualitative market research: a review of the literature.Journal of the Market Research Society, 32, 3, pp. 289–323.
41.
TrevaskisH. (2000) ‘You had to be there’ why marketers are increasingly experiencing consumers for themselves and the impact of this on the role and remit of consumer professionals.International Journal of Market Research, 42, 2, pp. 207–217.
42.
TseA.C.B.TseK.C.YinC.H.TingB.YiK.W.YeeK.P. & HongW.C. (1995) Comparing two methods of sending out questionnaires: e-mail versus mail.Journal of the Market Research Society, 37, 4, pp. 441–453.
43.
WunderG.C. & WynnG.W. (1988) The effects of address personalisation on mailed questionnaires response rate, time and quality.Journal of the Market Research Society, 30, 1, pp. 95–101.
44.
Xin-anZ.GrigoriouN. & LyL. (2008) The myth of China as a single market: the influence of personal value differences on buying decisions.International Journal of Market Research, 50, 3, pp. 377–402.
