This Viewpoint piece discusses “puffery”, what the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) defines as a ‘term frequently used to denote the exaggerations reasonably to be expected of a seller as to the degree of quality of his product, the truth or falsity of which cannot be precisely determined'’. The authors discuss their own use of semiotic analysis to investigate the existence of visual puffery in magazine advertising of women's fragrances.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CallisterM. & SternL. (2007) The role of visual hyperbole in advertising effectiveness.Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 29, 2, p. 1–14.
2.
CorbettE. (1990) Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student.New York: Oxford University Press.
McQuarrieE. & MickD. (1999) Visual rhetoric in advertising: text-interpretive, experimental, and reader-response analyses.Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 1, pp. 37–54.
5.
McQuarrieE. & MickD. (2003) Visual and verbal rhetorical figures under directed processing versus incidental exposure to advertising.Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 4, pp. 579–588.
6.
McQuarrieE. & PhillipsB. (2005) Indirect persuasion in advertising: how consumers process metaphors presented in pictures and words.Journal of Advertising, 34, 2, pp. 7–21.
7.
MorganS. & ReichertT. (1999) The message is in the metaphor: assessing the comprehension of metaphors in advertisements.Journal of Advertising, 28, 4, pp. 1–12.
