Mixed mode: The Only ‘Fitness’ Regime?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blumberg

, Luke

, & Cynamon

(2004) Has cord-cutting cut into random-digit-dialled health surveys? The prevalence and impact of wireless substitution. Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Health Survey Research Methods. Atlanta, GA.

Blyth

(2005) Inference from non-probability samples in marketing research. Proceedings of the 55th Session of the International Statistics Institute, Sydney, 5–12 April.

Couper

M. P.

(2004) Of frames and non-response: issues related to non-observation. Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Health Survey Research Methods. Atlanta, GA.

de Leeuw

E.D.

(1992) Data Quality in Mail, Telephone, and Face-to-face Surveys. Amsterdam: TT-Publicaties.

de Leeuw

E.D.

(2005) To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 21, 2, pp. 233–255.

Dillman

D. A.

(2004) The conundrum of mixed-mode in the 21st century. Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Health Survey Research Methods. Atlanta, GA.

ESOMAR (2000) Annual Review 1999. Amsterdam: ESOMAR.

ESOMAR (2006a) Annual Review 2005. Amsterdam: ESOMAR.

ESOMAR (2006b) Prices Study 2005. Amsterdam: ESOMAR.

10.

European Commission (2006) E-Communications Household Survey. Brussels: European Commission.

11.

Groves

R. M.

(1989) Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: Wiley.

12.

Inside Research (2006) US internet MR grows faster, July, pp. 1–3.

13.

Market Research Development Fund (1981) Telephone Research. Proceedings of the Market Research Development Fund Conference, London.

14.

Millward

(1971) Towards a more effective market research contribution to the success of consumer marketing companies. Proceedings of the 1971 MRS Conference. London: MRS.

15.

Miln

, & Stewart-Hunter

(1976) The case for telephone research. MRS Conference Papers. London: MRS.

16.

Moser

C.A.

, & Stuart

(1953) An experimental study of quota sampling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, CXVI, IV, pp. 349–406.

17.

National Center for Health Statistics (2005) US National Health Interview Survey. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

18.

Office for National Statistics (2005) Guidelines for Measuring Statistical Quality. London: ONS.

19.

Statistics Commission (2005) Report No. 27: Managing the Quality of Official Statistics. London: Statistics Commission.