AdlerN.J. (1991) International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior.Boston: PWS-Kent.
2.
AlbaumG. (1997) The Likert scale revisited: an alternate version.Journal of the Market Research Society, 39, 2, pp. 331–348.
3.
AlbaumG., EricksonR., & StrandskovJ. (1989) Questionnaire design in international and cross-cultural research: is translation necessary? Proceedings of the Society for Consumer Psychology Annual Conference, St. Petersburg, FL, pp. 10–15.
4.
AlbaumG., RogersR.D., RosterC., & YuJ.H. (2005) Are there central tendency errors in simple rating scales? Paper presented at the 11th Cross Cultural Research Conference, Puerto Rico, 11-14 December.
5.
BardoJ.W., & YeagerS.J. (1982) Consistency of response style across types of response formats.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 1, pp. 307–310.
6.
BardoJ.W., YeagerS.J., & KlingspornM.J. (1982) Preliminary assessment of format-specific central tendency and leniency error in summated rating scales.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54, 1, pp. 227–234.
7.
BaumgartnerH., & SteenkampJ.-B.E.M. (2001) Response style in marketing research: a cross-national investigation.Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 2, pp. 143–156.
8.
BerryJ.W. (1980) Introduction to methodology. In TriandisH.C., & BerryJ.W. (eds) Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 2, Methodology.Boston: Allyn & Bacon, pp.1-28.
9.
CheungG.W., & RensvoldR.B. (2000) Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equations modeling.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 2, pp. 187–212.
10.
ClarkeI.III (2000) Global marketing research: is extreme response style influencing your results?Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 12, 4, pp. 91–111.
11.
ClarkeI.III (2001) Extreme response style in cross-cultural research.International Marketing Review, 18, 3, pp. 301–324.
12.
CompeauL.D., & FrankeG.R. (1990) Isolating and quantifying the intensity dimension of category rating scales. Proceedings of the Annual Educators' Conference of the American Marketing Association, Washington DC, pp. 293–98.
13.
ConverseJ., & PresserS. (1993) Survey Questions.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
CraigC.S., & DouglasS.P. (2001) Conducting international marketing research in the twenty-first century.International Marketing Review, 18, 1, pp. 80–90.
15.
DouglasS.P., & CraigC.S. (1983) International Marketing Research.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16.
EagleyA.H., & ChaikenS. (1993) The Psychology of Attitudes.Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
17.
FombrunC.J., & van RielC.B.M. (2004) Fame & Fortune: How Successful Companies Build Winning Reputations.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
HsiehM., PanS., & SetionoR. (2004) Product-, corporate-, and country-image dimensions and purchase behavior: a multicountry analysis.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32, 3, pp. 251–270.
22.
JohnsonT., KulseaP., ChoY., & ShavittS. (2005) The relation between culture and response styles: evidence from 19 countries.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 2, pp. 264–277.
23.
KahleL.R., RoseG., & ShohamA. (1999) Findings of LOV throughout the world and other evidence of cross-national psychographics introduction.Journal of Euromarketing, 8, 1, pp. 1–14.
24.
KitchenP.J., & LaurenceA. (2003) Corporate reputation: an eight-country analysis.Corporate Reputation, 6, 2, pp. 103–117.
25.
LarocheM., UeltschyL.C., AbeS., ClevelandM., & YannopoulosP.P. (2004) Service quality perceptions and customer satisfaction: evaluating the role of culture.Journal of International Marketing, 12, 3, pp. 58–85.
26.
LikertR. (1932) A technique for measurement of attitudes.Archives of Psychology, 22, 140, pp. 44–53.
27.
MarshallR., MaoJ.X., & LeeC. (1995) A cross-cultural between-gender study of extreme response style. In SmithS.M. (ed.) Proceedings of Fifth Cross-Cultural Consumer and Business Studies Symposium, Hong Kong, pp.221–230.
28.
OhmaeK. (1989) Managing in a borderless world.Harvard Business Review, 67, 3, pp. 152–161.
PaulhusD.L. (1991) Measurement and control of response bias. In: RobinsonJ.P., SawyerP.R., & WrightmanL.S. (eds) Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, Vol. 1. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31.
PeabodyD. (1962) Two components in bipolar scales: direction and intensity.Psychological Review, 69, 2, pp. 65–73.
32.
PettyR.E., & KrosnickJ.A. (1995) Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences.NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
PhelpsL., SchmitzC.D., & BoatrightB. (1986) The effects of halo and leniency on cooperating teacher reports using Likert rating scales.Journal of Educational Research, 79, 3, pp. 151–154.
34.
Riahi-BelkaouiA. (2001) The Role of Corporate Reputation for Multinational Firms: Accounting, Organizational, and Market Considerations.Westport, CT: Quorum.
35.
SalzbergerT., SinkovicsR.R., & SchlegelmilchB.B. (1999) Data equivalence in cross-cultural research: a comparison of classical test theory and latent trait theory based approaches.Australasian Marketing Journal, 7, 2, pp. 23–38.
36.
SteningB.W., & EverettJ.E. (1984) Response styles in a cross-cultural managerial study.Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 2, pp. 151–156.
Van HerkH., PoortingaY.H., & VerhallenT.M.M. (2004) Response styles in rating scales: evidence of method bias in data from six EU countries.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 3, pp. 346–360.
39.
YuJ., AlbaumG., & SwensonM. (2003) Is a central tendency error inherent in the use of semantic differential scales in different cultures?International Journal of Market Research, 45, 2, pp. 213–228.