BaconD.R. (2003) A comparison of approaches to importance-performance analysis.International Journal of Market Research, 45, pp. 55–71.
3.
BassF.M., & WilkieW.L. (1973) A comparative analysis of attitudinal predictions of brand preference.Journal of Marketing Research, 10, pp. 262–269.
4.
BeckwithN.E., & LehmannD. (1973) The importance of differential weights in multi-attribute models of consumer attitude.Journal of Marketing Research, 10, pp. 141–145.
5.
BradleyR.A., & TerryM.E. (1952) Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons.Biometrika, 39, pp. 324–345.
6.
CohenS. (2003) Maximum difference scaling: improved measures of importance and preference for segmentation. Proceedings of the 2003 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings, San Diego, CA, pp. 61–74.
7.
DavidH.A. (1988) The Method of Paired Comparisons (2nd edn, revised).London: Charles Griffin.
8.
FinnA., & LouviereJ.J. (1992) Determining the appropriate response to evidence of public concern: the case of food safety.Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 11, pp. 19–25.
9.
FishbeinM. (1967) A behavior theory approach to the relations between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward the object. In: FishbeinM. (ed.) Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement.New York: Wiley, pp. 389–399.
10.
GenschD.H., & ReckerW.W. (1979) The multinomial, multiattribute logit choice model.Journal of Marketing Research, 16, pp. 124–132.
11.
HeelerR.M., OkechukuC., & ReidS. (1979) Attribute importance: contrasting measurements.Journal of Marketing Research, 16, pp. 60–63.
12.
HolbrookM.B. (1977) Comparing multiattribute models by optimal scaling.Journal of Consumer Research, 4, pp. 165–171.
13.
JaccardJ.D., BrinbergD., & AckermanL.J. (1986) Assessing attribute importance: a comparison of six methods.Journal of Consumer Research, 12, pp. 463–468.
14.
KruskalW. (1987) Relative importance by averaging over orderings.American Statistician, 41, pp. 6–10.
15.
LodgeM. (1981) Magnitude scaling: quantitative measurement of opinions. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-025.Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
16.
MarderE. (1997) The Laws of Choice: Predicting Consumer Behavior.New York: Free Press.
17.
McFaddenD. (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: ZarembkaP. (ed.) Frontiers in Econometrics.New York: Academic Press, pp. 105–142.
18.
MyersJ.H. (1996) Segmentation and Positioning for Strategic Marketing Decisions.Chicago: American Marketing Association.
19.
MyersJ.H. (1999) Measuring Customer Satisfaction: Hot Buttons and Other Measurement Issues.Chicago: American Marketing Association.
20.
OrmeB. (2003) Scaling multiple items: monadic ratings vs paired comparisons. Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings. San Diego, CA, pp. 43–59.
21.
RetzerJ. (2006) The century of Bayes, International Journal of Market Research, 48, 1, pp. 49–60.
22.
RosenbergM.J. (1956) Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, pp. 367–372.
23.
SoofiE.S., RetzerJ.J., & Yasai-ArdekaniM. (2000) A framework for measuring the importance of variables with applications to management research and decision models.Decision Sciences Journal, 31, pp. 596–625.
24.
StapletonL.M., & EdmondsM. (2005) An exploration of the validity of the unbounded write-in scale for inter-individual research.International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17, pp. 484–494.
25.
StephensonW. (1953) The Study of Behavior: The Q-Technique and its Methodology.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
StrathmannW.C., ZastrownyT.R., BayerL.R., AdamsE.H., BlackG.S., & FryP.A. (1994) Patient satisfaction surveys and multicollinearity.Quality Management in Health Care, 2, pp. 1–12.
27.
SwaitJ., & LouviereJ. (1993) The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and use of multinomial logit models.Journal of Marketing Research, 30, pp. 305–314.
28.
TheilH., & ChungC. (1988) Information-theoretic measures of fit for univariate and multivariate linear regressions.American Statistician, 42, pp. 249–252.
29.
ThurstoneL.L. (1927) A law of comparative judgment.Psychology Review, 34, pp. 273–286.
30.
WilkieW.L., & PessemierE.A. (1973) Issues in marketing's use of multi-attribute attitude models.Journal of Marketing Research, 10, pp. 428–441.