BortzJ., & DöringN. (2002) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human-und Sozialwissenschaftler, 3rd edn. Berlin: Springer.
5.
BrownJ., CulkinN., & FletcherJ. (2001) Human factors in business-to-business research on the internet. International Journal of Market Research, 43, 4, pp. 425–440.
CobanogluC., WardeB., & MoreoP.J. (2001) A comparison of mail, fax and web-based survey methods. International Journal of Market Research, 43, 4, pp. 441–452.
8.
DeutskensE., De RuyterK., WetzelsM., & OosterveldP. (2004) Response rate and response quality of internet-based surveys: an experimental study. Marketing Letters, 15, 1, pp. 21–36.
9.
DiamantopoulosA., & SchlegelmilchB.B. (1996) Determinants of industrial survey response: a survey-on-surveys analysis of researchers’ and managers’ views. Journal of Marketing Management, 12, pp. 505–531.
10.
DillmanD.A. (1978) Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.New York: Wiley-Interscience.
11.
DillmanD.A. (1999) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley.
12.
DillonW.R., MaddenT.J., & FirtleN.F. (1994) Marketing Research in a Marketing Environment, 3rd edn. Boston: Irwin.
13.
DommeyerC.J., & MoriartyE. (2000) Comparing two forms of an email survey: imbedded vs attached. International Journal of Market Research, 42, 1, pp. 39–50.
14.
EvansJ.R., & MathurA. (2005) The value of online surveys. Internet Research, 15, 2, pp. 195–219.
15.
Folkman CurasiC. (2001) A critical exploration of face-to-face interviewing vs computer-mediated interviewing. International Journal of Market Research, 43, 4, pp. 361–375.
16.
FurrerO., & SudharshanD. (2001) Internet marketing research: opportunities and problems. Qualitative Market Research, 4, 3, pp. 123–129.
17.
GreerT.V., ChuchinprakarnN., & SeshadriS. (2000) Likelihood of participating in mail survey research: business respondents' perspectives. Industrial Marketing Management, 29, pp. 97–109.
18.
GriffisS.E., GoldsbyT.J., & CooperM. (2003) Web-based and mail surveys: a comparison of response, data and cost. Journal of Business Logistics, 24, 2, pp. 237–258.
19.
HarveyL. (1986) A research note on the impact of class-of-mail on response rates to mailed questionnaires. Journal of the Market Research Society, 28, 3, pp. 299–300.
20.
IllievaJ., BaronS., & HealeyN.M. (2002) Online surveys in marketing research: pros and cons. International Journal of Market Research, 44, 3, pp. 361–376.
21.
KentR., & LeeM. (1999) Using the internet for market research: a study of private trading on the internet. Journal of the Market Research Society, 41, 4, pp. 377–385.
22.
KlassenR.D., & JacobsJ. (2001) Experimental comparison of web, electronic and mail survey technologies in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 19, pp. 713–728.
23.
KotzabH. (2005) The role and importance of survey research in the field of supply chain management. In KotzabH., SeuringS., MüllerM., & ReinerG. (eds) Research Methodologies in Supply Chain Management.Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, pp. 125–137.
24.
LambertD.M., & HarringtonT.C. (1990) Measuring nonresponse bias in customer service mail surveys. Journal of Business Logistics, 11, 2, pp. 5–25.
25.
MalhotraN.K., & BirksD.F. (2000) Marketing Research: An Applied Approach, European edn. London: Pearson Education Limited.
26.
McDonaldH., & AdamS. (2003) A comparison of online and postal data collection methods in marketing research. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 21, 2, pp. 85–95.
27.
MehtaR., & SivadasE. (1995) Comparing response rates and response content in mail versus electronic mail surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society, 37, 4, pp. 429–439.
28.
MentzerJ.T., & FlintD.J. (1997) Validity in logistics research. Journal of Business Logistics, 14, 1, pp. 27–42.
29.
MillerT.W. (2001) Can we trust the data of online research?Marketing Research, 13, 2, pp. 26–32.
30.
NgaiE.W.T. (2003) Internet marketing research (1987–2000): a literature review and classification. European Journal of Marketing, 37, 1/2, pp. 24–49.
31.
PincottG., & BranthwaiteA. (2000) Nothing new under the sun?International Journal of Market Research, 42, 2, pp. 137–155.
32.
RanchhodA., & ZhouF. (2001) Comparing respondents of email and mail surveys: understanding the implications of technology. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 19, 4, pp. 254–262.
33.
SchaeferD.R., & DillmanD.A. (1998) Development of a standard email methodology: results of an experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 3, pp. 378–397.
34.
SchlegelmilchB.B., & DiamantopoulosA. (1991) Prenotification and mail survey response rates: a quantitative integration of the literature. Journal of the Market Research Society, 33, 3, pp. 243–255.
35.
SchollN., MuldersS., & DrentR. (2002) On-line qualitative market research: interviewing the world at a fingertip. Qualitative Market Research, 5, 3, pp. 210–223.
36.
TaylorH. (2000) Does internet research work?Journal of the Market Research Society, 42, 1, pp. 51–63.
37.
TseA.C.B. (1998) Comparing the response rate, response speed and response quality of two methods of sending questionnaires: email vs mail. Journal of the Market Research Society, 40, 4, pp. 353–361.
38.
TutenT.L., UrbanD.J., & BosnjakM. (2002) Internet surveys and data quality: a review. In BatinicB., ReipsU., & BosnjakM. (eds) Online Social Science.Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber, pp. 7–27.
39.
WeibleR., & WallaceJ. (1998) Cyber research: the impact of the internet on data collection. Marketing Research, 10, 3, pp. 19–25.
40.
WertJ. (2004) The Vision 2010 project. Presentation to the ESOMAR Representatives Meeting, 18 September, Lisbon.
41.
WhitleyE.W. (1985) The case for postal research. Journal of the Market Research Society, 27, 1, pp. 5–13.
42.
WilsonA., & LaskeyN. (2003) Internet-based marketing research: a serious alternative to traditional research methods?Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 21, 2, pp. 79–84.
43.
WunderG.C., & WynnG.W. (1988) The effects of address personalisation on mailed questionnaires response rate, time and quality. Journal of the Market Research Society, 30, 1, pp. 95–101.