AlsJ. (1999) Industria de los estudios de mercado en Espaa 1998. Investigacin y Marketing, 64, pp. 74–76.
2.
AyidiyaS.A., & McClendonM.J. (1990) Response effects in mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, pp. 229–247.
3.
BabbieE. R. (1973) Survey Research Methods.Wadsworth: Welmont.
4.
BaileyK. D. (1978) Methods of Social Research.New York: Free Press.
5.
BlackJ.A., & ChampionD.J. (1976) Methods and Issues in Social Research.New York: Wiley.
6.
BourqueL.B., & FielderE.P. (1995) How to Conduct Self-Administered and Mail Surveys.London: Sage.
7.
de la Ballina BalllinaF.J. (1988) La encuesta postal en la investigacin de Mercados. Investigacin y Marketing, 58, pp. 59–64.
8.
DeleeuwE.D., & HoxJ.J. (1988) The effects of response-stimulating factors on response rates and data quality in mail surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 4, pp. 241–249.
9.
DeleeuwE.D., MellenbergG., & HoxJ.J. (1996) The influence of data collection methods on structural models. Sociological Methods and Research, 24, pp. 443–472.
10.
Daz de RadaV. (1999) Measure and control of the non-response in a mail survey, paper presented at the WAPOR Annual Conference, Paris, 35 September.
11.
Daz de RadaV. (2000) Using Dillman's Total Design Method (TDM) in a south Europe country: Spain, paper presented at the WAPOR Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon, 1718 May.
12.
DillmanD. A. (1978) Mail and Telephone Surveys.New York: Wiley.
13.
DillmanD. A. (2000) Mail and Internet Surveys.New York: Wiley.
14.
DillmanD.A., & MooreD.E. (1983) Improving Response to Mail Surveys: Results From Five Experiments. Unpublished manuscript, Washington State University.
15.
DownsP.E., & KerJ.R. (1986) Recent evidence on the relationship between anonimity and response variables for mail surveys. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 14, pp. 72–82.
16.
FariaA.J., DickinsonJ.R., & FilipicT.V. (1990) The effect of telephone versus letter prenotification on mail survey response rate. Journal of the Market Research Society, 32, pp. 551–568.
17.
GoyderJ. (1987) The Silent Minority.Cambridge: Polity Press.
18.
GraetzB. (1985) The potential of mail surveys. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 21, pp. 445–455.
19.
HerzogA.R., & RodgersW.L. (1988) Interview older adults. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, pp. 84–99.
20.
JussaumeR.A., and YamadaY. (1990) A comparison of the viability of mail surveys in Japan and the United States. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, pp. 219–228.
21.
KaldenbergD.O. (1994) Mail survey response rate. Patterns in a population of the elderly. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, pp. 68–76.
22.
KeeterS. (1995) Estimating telephone noncoverage bias with a telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, pp. 196–217.
23.
KvizF. J. (1984) Bias in a directory sample for a mail survey of rural households. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, pp. 801–806.
24.
LabovitzS., & HagedornR. (1971) Introduction to Social Research.London: McGraw Hill.
25.
McClendonM. (1991) Acquiescence and recency response-order effects in interview surveys. Sociological Methods and Research, 20, pp. 60–103.
NarayanS., and KrosnickJ.A. (1996) Education moderates some response effect in attitude measurement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, pp. 58–88.
28.
NederhofA. J. (1988) Effects of a final telephone reminder and questionnaire cover design in mail surveys. Social Science Research, 17, pp. 353–361.
29.
PoeG.L., SeemanI., McLaughlinJ., MehlE., & DietzM. (1988) ‘Don't know’ boxes in factual questions in a mail questionnaire. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, pp. 212–222.
30.
SchumanH., & PresserS. (1996) Questions and Answers in Attitudes Surveys.London: Sage.
31.
TuckerC., LepkowskiJ.M., CasadyR.J., & GrovesR.M. (1992) Commercial residential telephone lists: their characteristics and uses in survey design. Social Science Computer Review, 10, pp. 158–172.
32.
VisautaB. (1989) Tcnicas de Investigacin Social.Barcelona: PPU.