AmblerT., & BurneT. (1999) The impact of affect on memory of advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 39, 2, pp. 25–34.
2.
BrengmanM., GeuensM., & De PelsmackerP. (2001) The determining factors of brand confusion. Journal of Marketing Communications, 7, 4, pp. 231–243.
3.
BroadbentS., SpittlerJ.Z., & LynchK. (1997) Building better TV schedules: new light from the single source. Journal of Advertising Research, 37, 4, pp. 27–31.
4.
De PelsmackerP., & GeuensM. (1999) The advertising effectiveness of different levels of intensity of humour and warmth and the moderating role of top of mind awareness and degree of product use. Journal of Marketing Communications, 3, 2, pp. 113–129.
5.
De PelsmackerP., DecockB., & GeuensM. (1998) Advertising characteristics and the attitude towards the ad a study of 100 likeable television commercials. Marketing and Research Today, 27, 4, pp. 166–179.
6.
De PelsmackerP., GeuensM., & AnckaertP. (2002) Media context and advertising effectiveness: the role of context appreciation and context-ad similarity. Journal of Advertising, 31, 2, pp. 49–61.
7.
De PelsmackerP., GeuensM., & Van den BerghJ. (2004) Marketing Communications. A European Perspective.Harlow: Financial Times/Prentice-Hall.
8.
D'SouzaG., & RaoR.C. (1995) Can repeating an advertisement more frequently than the competition affect brand preference in a mature market?Journal of Marketing, 59 (April), pp. 32–42.
9.
EphronE. (1995) More weeks, less weight: the shelf-space model of advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 35, 3, pp. 18–23.
10.
GeuensM., & De PelsmackerP. (1999) Individual differences and the communication effects of different types of emotional stimuli: ‘affect intensity’ revisited. Psychology and Marketing, 16, 3, pp. 195–209.
11.
HitchonJ.C., & ThorsonE. (1995) The effects of emotion and product involvement on the experience of repeated commercial viewing. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 39, 3, pp. 376–389.
12.
HollisN. S. (1995) Like it or not, liking is not enough. Journal of Advertising Research, 35, 5, pp. 7–16.
13.
JonesJ. P. (1995) Single-source research begins to fulfill its promise. Journal of Advertising Research, 35, 3, pp. 9–16.
14.
KentR. J. (1997) How ad claim similarity and target brand familiarity moderate competitive interference effects in memory for advertising. Journal of Marketing Communications, 3, 3, pp. 231–242.
15.
LangA., DhillonK., & DongQ. (1995) The effects of emotional arousal and valence on television viewers' cognitive capacity and memory. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 39, 3, pp. 313–327.
16.
LongmanK. A. (1997) If not effective frequency, then what? Journal of Advertising Research, 37, 4, pp. 44–50.
17.
McDonaldC. (1997) From ‘frequency’ to ‘continuity’ is it a new dawn?Journal of Advertising Research, 37, 4, pp. 21–25.
18.
MuehlingD.D., & McCannM. (1993) Attitude toward the ad: a review. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 15, 2, pp. 25–58.
19.
NaplesM. (1997) Effective frequency: then and now. Journal of Advertising Research, 37, 4, pp. 7–12.
20.
NewellS.J., & HendersonK.V. (1998) Super bowl advertising: field-testing the importance of advertising frequency, length and placement on recall. Journal of Marketing Communications, 4, 3, pp. 237–248.
21.
PietersR.G.M., & BijmoltT.H.A. (1997) Consumer memory for television advertising: a field study of duration, serial position, and competition effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 23 (March), pp. 362–372.
22.
StaymanD.M., AakerD.A., & BruzzoneD.E. (1989) The incidences of commercial types broadcast in prime time. Journal of Advertising Research, 29, 4, pp. 26–33.
23.
TellisG. J. (1997) Effective frequency: one exposure or three factors?Journal of Advertising Research, 37, 4, pp. 75–80.
