AneshenshelC.S., BecerraR.M., FiedlerE.P., & SchulerR.H. (1989) Participation of Mexican American female adolescents in a longitudinal panel study. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, pp. 548–562.
2.
BuckS. (1989) Single source data the theory and the practice. Journal of the Market Research Society, 31, 4, pp. 489–500.
3.
BuckS., & YatesA. (1986) Television viewing, consumer purchasing, and single source research. Journal of the Market Research Society, 28, 3, pp. 225–233.
4.
BucklinL.P., & CarmanJ.M. (1967) The Design of Consumer Research Panel: Conception and Administration of the Berkeley Food Panel.Berkeley, CA: Institute of Business and Economic Research, University of California.
5.
CraigC.S., & McCannJ.M. (1978) Item non-response in mail surveys: extent and correlate. Journal of Marketing, 15, pp. 285–287.
6.
CriquiM. H. (1979) Response bias and risk rations in epidemiological studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109, pp. 394–399.
7.
DouglasS., & ShoemakerR. (1981) Item non-response in a cross-national attitude survey. European Research, July, pp. 124–132.
8.
DurandM.R., GuffeyH.J.Jr, & PlanchonJ.M. (1983) An examination of the random versus nonrandom nature of item omissions. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, pp. 305–313.
9.
DurandM.R., & LambertZ.V. (1988) Don't know responses in surveys: analyses and interpretational consequences. Journal of Business Research, 11, pp. 169–188.
10.
FalarisE.M., & PetersH.E. (1998) Survey attrition and schooling choices. Journal of Human Resources, 33, pp. 31–54.
11.
FerberR. (1966) The Reliability of Consumer Reports of Financial Assets and Debts.Urbana, IL: Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Illinois.
12.
FitzgeraldJ., GottschalkP., & MoffittR. (1998) An analysis of sample attrition in panel data: the Michigan panel study of income dynamics. Journal of Human Resources, 33, pp. 251–299.
13.
FrancisJ.D., & BuschL. (1975) What we now know about, ‘I don't knows’. Public Opinion Quarterly, 39, pp. 207–218.
14.
GoudyW. J. (1977) Non-response Effects: Studies of the Failure of Potential Respondents to Reply to Survey Instruments.Monticello: Council of Planning Librarians.
15.
GreenlandS. (1977) Response and follow-up bias in cohort studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 106, pp. 184–187.
16.
GronhaugK., GillyM.C., & EnisB.M. (1988) Exploring income non-response: a logit model analysis. Journal of the Marketing Research Society, 30, pp. 371–377.
17.
HanusekE., & JacksonJ. (1977) Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences.New York: Academic Press.
18.
HoustonM.J., & FordN.M. (1976) Reconsidering the scope of methodological research in mail survey. Journal of Marketing Research, 13, pp. 397–403.
19.
HuM.Y., TohR.S., & LeeE. (1996) Impact of the level of aggregation on response accuracy in surveys of behavioral frequency. Marketing Letters, 7, pp. 371–382.
20.
HuM.Y., TohR.S., & LeeE. (2000) Survey accuracy as a function of usage rate. Marketing Letters, 11, pp. 335–348.
21.
KupekE. (1988) Determinants of item non-response in a large national sex survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27, pp. 581–594.
22.
LeeE., HuM.Y., & TohR.S. (2000) Are consumer survey results distorted? Systematic impact of behavioral frequency and duration on survey response errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, pp. 125–133.
23.
McKenzieJ. (1983) The accuracy of telephone calls collected by diary methods. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, pp. 417–427.
24.
NeterJ. (1970) Measurement errors in reports of consumer expenditures. Journal of Marketing Research, 7, pp. 11–25.
25.
NorrisF. H. (1987) Effects of attrition on relationships between variables in surveys of older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 42, pp. 97–605.
26.
SnowD.L., TebesJ.K., & ArthurM.W. (1992) Panel attrition and external validity in adolescent substance use research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, pp. 804–807.
27.
SobolM. G. (1959) Panel mortality and panel bias. American Statistical Association Journal, 54, pp. 52–68.
28.
SussmanM. B. (1964) Use of the longitudinal design in studies of long-term illness. Some advantages and limitations. Gerontologist, 4, pp. 25–29.
29.
TohR.S., & HuM.Y. (1996) Natural mortality and participation fatigue as potential biases in diary panels: impact of some demographic factors and behavioral characteristics on systematic attrition. Journal of Business Research, 35, pp. 129–138.
30.
WheatR., & MorrisonD.G. (1990) Estimating purchase regularity with two interpurchase times. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, pp. 87–93.
31.
WinefieldA.H., WinefieldH.R., & TiggermanM. (1990) Sample attrition bias in a longitudinal study of young people. Australian Journal of Psychology, 42, pp. 75–85.
32.
WinerR. (1983) Attrition bias in econometric models estimated with panel data. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, pp. 177–186.
33.
WoolsenR., ClarkeW., & LeeperJ. (1992) Missing data in longitudinal studies. In DwayerJ.H., FeinliebM., LippertP., & HoffmeisterH. (eds) Statistical Models for Longitudinal Studies of Health.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 277–300.
34.
ZabelJ. E. (1998) An analysis of attrition in the panel study of income dynamics and the survey of income and program participation with an application to a model of labor market behavior. Journal of Human Resources, 33, pp. 479–506.
35.
ZiliakJ.P., & KniesnerT.J. (1998) The importance of sample attrition in life-cycle labor supply estimation. Journal of Human Resources, 33, pp. 507–530.