This study compares mail, fax and web-based surveys in a university setting for response speed, response rate and costs. The survey was distributed to 300 hospitality professors randomly chosen from the Council on Hotel, Restaurant, and Institutional Education members listed in the organisation's online directory as of April 2000. It was found that the fastest method was fax, with an average of 4.0 days to respond, followed by web surveys with 5.97 days. The slowest method, as expected, was mail surveys, with 16.46 days to respond. On average, the response rate was 28.91%: 26.27% for mail, 17.0% for fax, and 44.21% for web surveys. An LSD-type z-test shows significant differences between mail and email/web and between fax and email/web, but no significant difference between mail and fax. In addition, data were analysed for data consistency and cost.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BachmannD., ElfrinkJ., & VazzanaG.. (1996) Tracking the progress of email vs snailmail.Marketing Research, 8, 2, pp. 30–36.
2.
BachmannD.P., ElfrinkJ., & VazzanaG.. (1999) Email and snailmail face off in rematch.Marketing Research, 11, 4, pp. 10–15.
3.
BeckJ.. (1996) Career anchors, organizational commitment, and job plateaus: an analysis of hotel executive operating committee members’ career development.Purdue University: doctoral dissertation. Publication number AAT 9725508.
4.
CobanogluC., WoodF.D., & MoreoJ.P. (2000) An assessment of the utilization of hospitality research. Fifth Annual Graduate Education and Graduate Student Research Conference on Hospitality and Tourism, Houston, Texas.
5.
De LeeuwE.D. (1992). Data Quality in Mail, Telephone and FacetoFace Surveys.Amsterdam: TT Publications.
6.
DicksonJ.P., & MacLachlanD.L. (1992) Fax surveys? Study finds the time may be right for business research.Marketing Research, 4, 3, pp. 26–31.
7.
DicksonJ.P., & MacLachlanD.L. (1996) Fax surveys: return patterns and comparison with mail surveys.Journal of Marketing Research, 33, pp. 108–113.
8.
DillmanD.A. (1978). Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.New York: WileyInterscience.
9.
DillmanD.A. (1999). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd edition.New York: John Wiley and Sons.
10.
DillmanD.A., & TarnaiJ.. (1988) Administrative issues in mixed mode surveys. In: Telephone Survey Methodology (GrovesR.M., BiemerP.P., LybergL.E., MasseyJ.T., NichollsW.L.II, & WakesbergJ., eds), pp. 509–528. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
11.
DommeyerC.J., & MoriartyE.. (2000) Comparing two forms of an email survey: embedded vs attached.International Journal of Market Research, 42, 1, pp. 39–50.
12.
HareS., PriceJ.H., FlynnM.G., & KingK.A. (1998) Increasing return rates of a mail survey to exercise professionals using a modest monetary incentive.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 1, pp. 217–218.
13.
KempthorneO.. (1952). The Design and Analysis of Experiments.New York: John Wiley and Sons.
14.
KieslerS., & SproullL.S. (1986) Response effects in the electronic survey.Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 3, pp. 402–413.
15.
MehtaR., & SivadasE.. (1995) Comparing response rates and response content in mail versus electronic mail surveys.Journal of the Market Research Society, 37, 4, pp. 429–439.
16.
ParkerL.. (1992) Collecting data in the email way.Training and Development, 46, 7, p. 52.
17.
RylanderR.G., PropstD.B., & McMurtyT.R. (1995) Non response and recall biases in a survey of traveler spending.Journal of Travel Research, 33, 4, pp. 39–45.
18.
SchaeferD.R., & DillmanD.A. (1998) Development of a standard email methodology: results of an experiment.Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, pp. 378–397.
19.
SchuldtB.A., & TottenJ.W. (1994) Electronic mail versus mail survey response rates.Marketing Research, 6, 1, pp. 36–39.
20.
SchwarzN., HipplerH.J., & NoelleNeumannE.. (1992) A cognitive model of responseorder effects in survey measurement. In: Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research (SchwarzN., & SudmanS., eds), pp. 187–199. New York: SpringerVerlag.
21.
ShankM.D., DarrB.D., & WernerT.C. (1990) Increasing mail survey response rates: investigating the perceived value of cash versus noncash incentives.Applied Marketing Research, 30, 3, pp. 28–32.
22.
SheehanB.K., & McMillanJ.S. (1999) Response variation in email surveys: an exploration.Journal of Advertising Research, 39, 4, pp. 45–54.
23.
TseA.C.B., TseK.C., YinC.H., YiK.W., YeeK.P., & HongW.C. (1995) Comparing two methods of sending out questionnaires: email versus mail.Journal of the Market Research Society, 37, pp. 441–446.
24.
WeibleR., & WallaceJ.. (1998) The impact of the internet on data collection.Marketing Research, 10, 3, pp. 19–27.
