After this paper reviews the literature on online surveys, it describes an experiment that compares an embedded e-mail survey with an attached e-mail survey. The embedded survey yielded a significantly higher response rate than the attached survey, but there were no differences between the two methods on response speed, number of item omissions, or response bias. Suggestions are offered to future researchers of online surveys.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BachmannD., ElfrinkJ., & VazzanaG. (1996) Tracking the progress of e-mail vs. snail-mail. Marketing Research, 8, 2, pp. 30–6.
DillmanD. A. (1978). Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.New York: Wiley.
4.
DillmanD.A., SinclairM.D., & ClarkJ.R. (1993) Effects of questionnaire length, respondent-friendly design and a difficult question on response rates for occupant-addressed census mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, pp. 289–304.
5.
KaplanK. (1999a) NetZeros IPO will test value of free web access. Los Angeles Times, 23 August, C1+.
6.
KaplanK. (1999b) In giveaway of 10,000 PCs, the price is users privacy. Los Angeles Times, 8 February, A1+.
7.
KieslerS., & SproullL.S. (1986) Response effects in the electronic survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, pp. 402–13.
8.
KittlesonM. J. (1995) An assessment of the response rate via the postal service and e-mail. Health Values, 18, 2, pp. 2–79.
9.
MehtaR., & SivadasE. (1995) Comparing response rates and response content in mail versus electronic mail surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society, 37, 4, pp. 429–39.
OppermannM. (1995). Email surveys potentials and pitfalls. Marketing Research, 7, pp. 29–33.
12.
PalmquistJ., & StueveA. (1996) Stay plugged in to new opportunities. Market Research, 8, 1, pp. 13–15.
13.
ParkerL. (1992) Collecting data the e-mail way. Training & Development, July, pp. 524.
14.
SchaeferD.R., & DillmanD.A. (1998) Development of a standard e-mail methodology: results of an experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, pp. 378–97.
15.
SchuldtB.A., & TottenJ.W. (1994) Electronic mail versus mail survey response rates. Marketing Research, 6, 1, pp. 3–69.
16.
SproullL. S. (1986) Using electronic mail for data collection in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 1, pp. 159–69.
17.
The wired household (1997). Fortune, 134, Winter, 220+.
18.
TseA.C.B. (1998). Comparing the response rate, response speed, and response quality of two methods of sending questionnaires: e-mail vs. mail. Journal of the Market Research Society, 40, 4, pp. 353–61.
19.
TseA.C.B., TseK.C., YinC.H., TingC.B., YiK.W., YeeK.P., & HongW.C. (1995) Comparing two methods of sending out questionnaires: e-mail versus mail. Journal of the Market Research Society, 37, pp. 44–16.
20.
US Department of Commerce (1999). Falling Through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide.National Telecommunications and Information Administration, 27 pages. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99.
21.
WeibleR., & WallaceJ. (1998) The impact of the Internet on data collection. Marketing Research, 10, 3, pp. 19–27.
