This paper addresses the urgent need for our profession to agree on and articulate the taxonomy of skills and signals of competency for those conducting qualitative market research focus groups.
It argues that this is required due to five factors: groups are used for strategic advice; they are high cost; people other than market researchers are offering them; the explanations of the skills seem to range from myth/magic through to experience and hard work; and for training and accreditation there has to be an agreed taxonomy.
The paper describes recent research into the views of 19 SQMRs (strategic qualitative market researchers) in Australia on this theme and related literature.
It proposes a model of the taxonomy of skills, a summary of a model of competency, a model of how SQMRs describe their analytical thinking in and outside of focus groups and an attempt to demythologise the skill and identify the cause of competency. It concludes by posing 15 questions for our profession.2
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChantG. (undated) Qualitative Research: Issues and Techniques.Melbourne: Chant Link and Associates.
2.
CowleyJ.C.P. (1993) Listen.Australia: New Focus Press.
3.
ElliottB. (1998a) Why qualitative research and nudist(s) dont go hand in hand. Address to MRSA, 11 May, unpublished, SA.
4.
ElliottB. (1998b) Through a glass darkly: debasing qualitative research. Unpublished paper. Sydney, Australia: Elliott and Shanahan Research.
5.
GlaserB.G., & StraussA. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory.Hawthorne, NY: Aldine Press Chicago.
KruegerR. A. (1998) Analysing and Reporting Focus Group Results.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
McCarthyE.J., PerreaultW.D., QuesterP.G., WilkinsonJ.W., & LeeK.Y. (1994) Basic Marketing. A Managerial Approach.USA: Richard Irwin Inc.
9.
MackayH. (1994) Why Dont People Listen?Australia: Pan Macmillan.
10.
ReuterU. (1995) The seven mortal sins in qualitative research theory and practice. ESOMAR seminar Looking Through the Kaleidoscope, Paris. Amsterdam: ESOMAR.
11.
SharpB. (1997) Marketing focus groups: science vs pseudo-science, commonsense vs mysticism. In: How Where When and Why Newsletter (March).Marketing Science Centre, University of South Australia.
12.
BellengerD.N., BernhardtK.L., & GoldstuckerJ.L. (1976) Qualitative Research in Marketing.Chicago: American Marketing Association.
13.
CalderB. J. (1977) Focus groups and the nature of qualitative market research. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, August, pp. 353–64.
14.
ColwellJ. (1990) Qualitative market research: a conceptual analysis and review of practitioner criteria. Journal of the Market Research Society, 32, 1, p. 13.
15.
CorrD., & TaylorC. (1996) Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data: unpacking the mysterious. Proceedings of The Market Research Society Conference, 2022 March, Birmingham.
16.
CowleyJ.C.P. (1996) Understanding the needs of customers and clients. Australian Professional Marketing, September, pp. 25–27.
17.
CrabtreeB.F., & MillerW.L. (1992) Doing Qualitative Research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
DenzinN.K., & KlincolnY.S. (Eds.) (1994) Introduction. Handbook of Qualitative Research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
DescartesR. (1628) Regulae ad Directionem Ingenii (Rules for the Direction of the Mind).Library of Liberal Arts, Indianapolis, USA.
20.
ESOMAR (1997) From international to cross-cultural markets the qualitative connection. Conference proceedings, Singapore. Amsterdam: ESOMAR.
21.
GoodyearM. (1998) Chapter in: ESOMAR Handbook of Market and Opinion Research. Ed. McDonaldC., & VangelderP.Amsterdam: ESOMAR.
22.
GordonW., & LangmaidR. (1988) Qualitative Market Research: A Practitioners and Buyers Guide.Aldershot: Gower.
23.
GriggsS. (1987) Analysing qualitative data. Journal of the Market Research Society, 16, p. 3.
24.
HayesT.J., & TathumC. (1989) Focus Group Interviews: A Reader. 2nd Edn. American Marketing Association, USA.
25.
HendersonN. R. (1992) Trained moderators boost the value of qualitative research. Marketing Research: a Magazine of Management Applications, 4, 2 (June), pp. 20–23.
26.
KadenR.J., & MobergG.D. (1989) Beyond moderator chemistry: guidelines for judging qualitative research. In: Focus Group Interviews: A Reader. 2nd Edn. American Marketing Association, USA.
27.
KirkJ., & MillerM.L. (1986) Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.
KotlerP. (1975) Marketing for Non Profit Organisations.USA: Prentice Hall.
29.
KruegerR. A. (1988) Focus Group Interviews A Practical Guide for Applied Research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
KruegerR. A. (1993) Quality control in focus group research. In: Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art in Sage Focus. Edn. 156. p. 65ff. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
LangerJ. (1987) The process of insight: how researchers turn qualitative research into marketing insight, 2nd Biannual ARF Qualitative Workshop Proceedings, pp. 7–39, 15 July. NY Hilton, Advertising Research Foundation.
32.
LindlofT. R. (1995) Qualitative Communication Research Methods.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33.
Market Research Society R&D Sub-Committee on Qualitative Research (1979) Qualitative research: a summary of the concepts involved. Journal of the Market Research Society, 21, 2.
