Low employment rate, owing to lack of aptly skilled workforce, is one of the major concerns of the Indian Information Technology (IT) sector. The study employed ranking-type Delphi method with an aim to identify those communication competencies which the employers of the Indian IT industry deem crucial for intercultural business interactions. A panel of 10 experts was created, and a total of 3 iterations were administered to achieve a satisfactory level of consensus among experts regarding the most important intercultural communication competencies (ICCs) for the Indian IT industry. Initially, a list of 25 competencies, identified through literature review, was sent to experts to be ranked. After the third iteration, the study provided a set of 10 ICCs for which there was strong agreement among the experts. Challenges and limitations have been discussed in brief.
AdlerMZiglioE (1996) Gazing into the Oracle: The Delphi Method and its Application to Social Policy and Public Health. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
2.
AgrawalNMThiteM (2006) Nature and importance of soft skills in software project leaders. Asia Pacific Management Review11(2): 93–102.
3.
AgrawalNMKhatriNSrinivasanR (2012) Managing growth: human resource management challenges facing the Indian software industry. Journal of World Business47(2): 159–166.
BanerjeeS (2008) Dimensions of Indian culture, core cultural values and marketing implications: an analysis. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal15(4): 367–378.
6.
BarkerGG (2016) Cross-cultural perspectives on intercultural communication competence. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research45(1): 13–30.
7.
BennettMJ (1998) Intercultural Communication: A Current Perspective. In: Milton JBennett (ed), Basic Concepts of Intercultural Communication: Selected Readings. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press, pp. 1–34.
8.
BowerWDHemingerAR (2002, 1) Development of a strategic decision framework for identifying and selecting knowledge management projects. In: Proceedings of the 35th annual Hawaii international conference on System Sciences, HICSS, 7–10 January 2002, Big Island, Hawaii, pp. 2592–2601. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
9.
BradfordLAllenMBeisserKR (2000) Meta-analysis of intercultural communication competence research. World Communication29(1): 28–51.
CegalaDJ (1981) Interaction involvement: a cognitive dimension of communicative competence. Communication Education30(2): 109–121.
12.
ChenGMStarostaWJ (1997) A review of the concept of intercultural sensitivity. Human Communication1: 1–16.
13.
ChenGM (2014) Intercultural Communication Competence: Summary of 30-Year Research and Directions for Future Study. In: XiaodongDaiGuo-MingChen (eds), Intercultural Communication Competence: Conceptualization and its Development in Cultural Contexts and Interactions. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 14–40.
14.
CodreanuA (2012) From theory to practice in the intercultural field: an assessment model for the intercultural communication competence concept. Review of the Air Force Academy1: 91.
15.
DelbecqALVan de VenAHGustafsonDH (1975) Group techniques for program planning. Originally Published by Scott Foresman Company Glenview, Illinois, 1975. Reprinted by Green Briar Press, Middleton, Wisconsin, 1986.
16.
DeardorffDK (2006) Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education10(3): 241–266.
GallegoDBuenoS (2014) Exploring the application of the Delphi method as a forecasting tool in information systems and technologies research. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management26(9): 987–999.
20.
GLOBE (2018) Global leadership & organizational behavior effectiveness. Visualizations showing culture and leadership data collected for India. URL (consulted 25 March 2018):http://globeproject.com/results/countries/IND?menu=list
21.
GuptaSBhaskarAU (2016) Doing business in India: cross-cultural issues in managing human resources. Cross Cultural and Strategic Management23(1): 184–204.
22.
HammerMR (1987) Behavioral dimensions of intercultural effectiveness: a replication and extension. International Journal of Intercultural Relations11(1): 65–88.
23.
HofstedeG (1991) Cultures and Organizations. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.
24.
HofstedeG (2010) The GLOBE debate: back to relevance. Journal of International Business Studies41(8): 1339–1346.
25.
HofstedeG (2011) Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture2(1). URL: https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
26.
HouseRJDorfmanPWJavidanM. (2014) Strategic Leadership Across Cultures: GLOBE Study of CEO Leadership Behavior and Effectiveness in 24 Countries. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
27.
HsuCCSandfordBA (2007) The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation12(10): 1–8.
KapoorSHughesPCBaldwinJR. (2003) The relationship of individualism–collectivism and self-construals to communication styles in India and the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations27(6): 683–700.
33.
KassingJW (1997) Development of the intercultural willingness to communicate scale. Communication Research Reports14(4): 399–407.
34.
KimYY (2001) Becoming Intercultural: An Integrative Theory of Communication and Cross Cultural Adaptation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
35.
KimYYGudykunstWB (1988) Cross-Cultural Adaptation: Current Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication; Annandale: Speech Communication Association, 11.
36.
KittlerMGRyglDMackinnonA (2011) Special review article: Beyond culture or beyond control? Reviewing the use of Hall’s high-/low-context concept. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management11(1): 63–82.
37.
KobusJWestnerM (2016) Ranking-Type Delphi Studies in IS Research: Step-By-Step Guide and Analytical Extension. Proceedings of the 9th IADIS International Conference, Portugal, 9–11, April 2016. URL (consulted 15 Dec 2016): http://is-conf.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/IS2016.pdf
38.
KuruvillaSRanganathanA (2008) Economic development strategies and macro-and micro-level human resource policies: the case of India’s ‘outsourcing’ industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review62(1): 39–72. Published by Cornell University.
39.
KumarRSethiA (2005) Doing Business in India. US: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
LalemanFPereiraVMalikA (2015) Understanding cultural singularities of ‘Indianness’ in an intercultural business setting. Culture and Organization21(5): 427–447.
41.
LloydSHärtelC (2010) Intercultural competencies for culturally diverse work teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology25(8): 845–875.
42.
MacIntyrePDDörnyeiZClémentR. (1998) Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: a situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal82(4): 545–562.
43.
MacIntyrePDBakerSCClémentR. (2001) Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition23(03): 369–388.
44.
MartinJNHammerMR (1989) Behavioral categories of intercultural communication competence: everyday communicators’ perceptions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations13(3): 303–332.
NishimuraSNevgiATellaS (2008) Communication style and cultural features in high/low context communication cultures: a case study of Finland, Japan, and India. Teoksessa A. Kallioniemi (toim.), Uudistuva ja kehittyvä ainedidaktiikka. Ainedidaktinen symposiumi8(2008): 783–796.
OkoliCPawlowskiSD (2004) The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management42(1): 15–29.
54.
PadhiSMishraS (2017) Effect of honesty as an ethical value on software project performance: a grounded theory approach. Journal of Human Values23(2): 92–105.
55.
PareGCameronAFPoba-NzaouP. (2013) A systematic assessment of rigor in information systems ranking-type Delphi studies. Information & Management50(5): 207–217.
56.
PortallaTChenGM (2010) The development and validation of the intercultural effectiveness scale. Intercultural Communication Studies19(3): 21–37.
57.
RajuR (2012) Intercultural communication training in IT outsourcing companies in India: a case study. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication55(3): 262–274.
58.
RaoRNThombreA (2015) Intercultural Communication: The Indian Context. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications India.
59.
Rawat (2016) B and C category B-schools producing un-employable pass-outs: ASSOCHAM. The Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (ASSOCHAM), 27 April 2016. URL (consulted 17 March 2018): http://www.assocham.org/newsdetail.php?id=5651
60.
RubenBD (1976) Assessing communication competency for intercultural adaptation. Group & Organization Studies1(3): 334–354.
61.
RubenBDKealeyDJ (1979) Behavioral assessment of communication competency and the prediction of cross-cultural adaptation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations3(1): 15–47.
SinhaJBP (2014) Psycho-Social Analysis of the Indian Mindset. New Delhi: Springer India.
66.
ShahDBarkerM (2017) Cracking the cultural code: Indian IT expatriates’ intercultural communication challenges in Australia. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management17(2): 215–236.
67.
ShettyPK (2016) Exploring newer dimensions in intercultural communication through Indian multiculturality. PhD Thesis. Manipal University, India. URL (consulted 22 February 2017): http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/125010
68.
ShiXWangJ (2011) Interpreting Hofstede model and globe model: Which way to go for cross-cultural research?International Journal of Business and Management6(5): 93.
69.
SpitzbergBHChangnonG (2009) Conceptualizing intercultural competence. In: DarlaK Deardorff (ed) The SAGE Handbook of Intercultural Competence: 2–52.
70.
SSC NASSCOM and Accenture (2013) IT-ITeS Sector Skill Council, NASSCOM. Skill Gaps in 2013. A joint report by SSC NASSCOM and Accenture. URL (consulted 29 February 2016):http://www.sscnasscom.com/analytics/skillgaps-1
71.
SteersRMNardonLSanchez-RundeCJ (2013) Management Across Cultures: Developing Global Competencies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72.
TiwariAUnnisaR (2013) Crossing Frontiers: English Language and the International Dimension. English Language Teacher Education in a Diverse Environment. In: Dr PhilipPowell-DaviesProfessor PaulGunashekar (eds) Selected Papers from the Third International Teacher Educators Conference. Hyderabad: British Council, pp. 150–153. 16–18 March 2013. URL (consulted 27 August 2017): https://www.britishcouncil.in/sites/default/files/tec_13_publication_final_version_0.pdf
73.
Van Der ZeeKIVan OudenhovenJP (2000) The multicultural personality questionnaire: a multidimensional instrument of multicultural effectiveness. European Journal of Personality14(4): 291–309.
74.
WisemanRLHammerMRNishidaH (1989) Predictors of intercultural communication competence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations13(3): 349–370.
