Using GLOBE classification and findings, this paper compares the family characteristics and work cultures of family businesses in Anglo, Germanic, and Nordic cultures. Results indicate differing patterns in terms of the involvement of the family in the family business and other key organizational dimensions. While all three regions share their weak family orientation, the Nordic and Germanic regions share stronger future orientation and uncertainty avoidance. The Anglo and Germanic regions share stronger performance orientation and the Nordic region stands out for its low power distance and low assertiveness. Overall, the characteristics of family businesses in the three regions may be associated with the distinctive regional cultures suggesting support for the presence of culturally implicit theories in the family business characteristics.
Ashkanasy N. ( 2002). Leadership in the Asian century: lessons from GLOBE. International Journal of Organizational Behavior5(3): 150-63.
2.
Barbot M.-C, Bayad M., Bourguiba M., and Schmitt C. ( 2005) Comparative Entrepreneurship: The Case of Father-to-Daughter Family Business Transmission in France and Tunisia, Working Paper, Small Business Advancement National Center, University of Arkansas: http://www.sbaer.uca.edu/research/icsb/2005/013.pdf.
3.
Baring G. ( 1992) Characteristics of Australian Family Business. Working Paper Series, 4/92. Melbourne: Monash University .
4.
Becker SO and Wobmann L. ( 2007) Was Weber Wrong? A Human Capital Theory of Protestant Economic History. Working Paper. Munich: IFO Institute, University of Munich.
5.
Burggraaf W., Floren RH and Geerlings JR ( 2008) Righteousness in ownership transfer: a cultural perspective . In: Gupta V, Levenburg N, Moore L, Motwani J and Schwarz T (eds) Culturally-Sensitive Models of Family Business in Germanic Europe: A Compendium Using the GLOBE Paradigm. Hyderabad: ICFAI University Press, 69-89.
6.
Chrisman JJ, Chua JH and Steier LP ( 2003) An introduction to theories of family business . Journal of Business Venturing18: 441-8.
7.
Craig J. and Moores K. ( 2004) The professionalization process in family business: the Dennis family corporation case. Family Business Journal: Case Book Annual91-122.
8.
Dannhaeuser N. ( 1993) The survival of family-operated firms under developed conditions: the case of Hassfurt, Germany. Journal of Developing Areas27: 307-28.
9.
Dunemann M. and Barett R. ( 2004) Family Business and Succession Planning: A Review of Literature . Melbourne: Family and Small Business Research Unit, Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University.
10.
Einola K. and Turgeon N. ( 2000) Scandinavian Television Markets: A Regional Perspective . Working Paper, 2000-05. Montreal: CETAI-HEC.
11.
England GW and Lee R. ( 1974) The relationship between managerial values and managerial success in the United States, Japan, India, and Australia. Journal of Applied Psychology59(4): 411-19.
12.
Flören RH ( 1998) The significance of family business in the Netherlands . Family Business Review11: 121-34.
13.
Franiuk R., Cohen D. and Pomerantz EM ( 2002) Implicit theories of relationships: implications for relationship satisfaction and longevity. Personal Relationships9(4): 345-67.
14.
Furnham A. ( 1988) Lay Theories: Everyday Understanding of Problems in the Social Sciences. New York: Pergamon .
15.
Gersick K., Davis J., Hampton M. and Lansberg I. ( 1997) Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business . Boston: Harvard Business School .
16.
Glauben T., Tietje H. and Weiss C. ( 2004) Intergenerational succession in farm households: evidence from upper Austria. Review of Economics of the Household2: 443-61.
17.
Gupta V. and Hanges PJ ( 2004) Regional and climate clustering of societal cultures . In: House RJ, Hanges PJ, Javidan M, Dorfman PW, and Gupta V (eds) Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications , 178-218.
18.
Gupta V., Levenburg N., Moore L., Motwani J. and Schwarz T. ( 2008a) Culturally-Sensitive Models of Family Business in Anglo region: A Compendium Using the GLOBE Paradigm. Hyderabad : ICFAI University Press.
19.
Gupta V., Levenburg N., Moore L., Motwani J. and Schwarz T. ( 2008b) Culturally-Sensitive Models of Family Business in Germanic Europe: A Compendium Using the GLOBE Paradigm. Hyderabad , India: ICFAI University Press.
20.
Gupta V., Levenburg N., Moore L., Motwani J. and Schwarz T. ( 2008c) Culturally-Sensitive Models of Family Business in Nordic Europe: A Compendium Using the GLOBE Paradigm. Hyderabad , India: ICFAI University Press.
21.
Gupta V. and Levenburg N. ( 2010). A Thematic Analysis of Cultural Variations in Family Businesses: The CASE Project. Family Business Review23(2): 155-69.
22.
Harju J. and Heinonen J. ( 2008) Analyzing Finnish family business performance. In: Gupta V, Levenburg N, Moore L, Motwani J and Schwarz T (eds) Culturally-Sensitive Models of Family Business in Nordic Europe: A Compendium Using the GLOBE Paradigm. Hyderabad, India: ICFAI University Press, 89-124.
23.
Harris R., Martinez J. and Ward J. ( 1994) Is strategy different for the family-owned business ? Family Business Review7(2): 159-74.
24.
Hofstede G. ( 2001) Culture’s Consequences, Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
25.
House RJ, Hanges PJ, Javidan M, Dorfman PW and Gupta V (eds) (2004) Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
26.
Kerr C., Dunlop JT, Harbison F. and Myers CA ( 1964) Industrialism and Industrial Man. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
Koulouvari P. ( 2008) Family Owned Media Companies in the Nordic Countries: A Portrait of Structures and Characteristics of 25 Firms. In: Gupta V, Levenburg N , Moore L, Motwani J, and Schwarz T ( 2008c) Culturally-Sensitive Models of Family Business in Nordic Europe: A Compendium Using the GLOBE Paradigm. Hyderabad : ICFAI University Press, 17-39.
28.
Laurent A. ( 1983) The cultural diversity of western conceptions of management . International Studies of Management and Organization13: 75-96.
29.
Lipset SM ( 1992) The work ethic, then and now. Journal of Labor Research13(1): 45-55.
30.
Littunen H. ( 2003) Management capabilities and environmental characteristics in the critical operational phase of entrepreneurship - a comparison between Finnish family and non-family firms. Family Business Review16(3): 183-96.
31.
Lundvall BÅ and Tomlinson M. ( 2000) On the convergence and divergence of national systems of innovation. Paper presented at the Volkswagen Foundation Symposium on Prospects and Challenges for Research on Innovation , Berlin, 8-9 June.
32.
Lussier RN and Sonfield MC ( 2004) Family business characteristics and management practices: an analysis of covariance study. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal10(1): 827-44.
33.
Malinen P. and Stenholm P. ( 2008) Transfer of entrepreneurship in the Finnish small family business succession context. In Gupta V, Levenburg N, Moore L, Motwani J and Schwarz T (eds) Culturally-Sensitive Models of Family Business in Nordic Europe: A Compendium Using the GLOBE Paradigm . Hyderabad: ICFAI University Press, 70-88.
34.
Mariussen A., Wheelock J. and Baines S. ( 1997) The family business tradition in Britain and Norway: modernization and reinvention. International Studies of Management and Organization27(3): 64-85.
35.
Meyer JW and Rowan B. ( 1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology83: 340-63.
36.
Miettinen A. ( 1997) Work and the family: Data on women and men in Europe . Working Papers E2/1997, Helsinki: The Population Research Institute, the family federation of Finland.
37.
Moores K. and Mula JM ( 2000) The salience of market, bureaucratic and clan controls in the management of family firm transitions: some tentative Australian evidence . Family Business Review91-106.
38.
Neubauer F. and Lank AG ( 1998) The Family Business: Its Governance for Sustainability . London: Macmillan Press.
39.
Neubauer, H. ( 2008). Family businesses and perspectives on corporate continuity - Reflections on the situation in Continental Europe. In: Gupta, V., Levenburg, N., Moore, L., Motwani, J. & Schwarz, Th. (eds) Culturally-Sensitive Models of Family Business in Germanic Europe - A Compendium using the Globe Paradigm , Hyderabad, 109-132.
40.
Ogbonna E. and Harris LC ( 2005) The adoption and use of information technology: a longitudinal study of a mature family firm. New Technology, Work and Employment20(1): 2-18.
41.
Pascale RT and Maguire MA ( 1980) Comparison of selected work factors in Japan and the United States. Human Relations33: 433-55.
42.
Peters M. and Buhalis D. ( 2008) Skill development in Austrian family hotel businesses . In: Gupta V, Levenburg N, Moore L , Motwani J, and Schwarz T (eds) Culturally-Sensitive Models of Family Business in Germanic Europe: A Compendium Using the GLOBE Paradigm. Hyderabad: ICFAI University Press, 48-68.
43.
Pistrui D., Welsch HP, Wintermantel O., Liao J. and Pohl HJ ( 2000) Entrepreneurial orientation and family forces in the new Germany: similarities and differences between East and West German entrepreneurs . Family Business Review13(3): 251-64.
44.
Ricks DA, Toyne B. and Martinez Z. ( 1990) Recent developments in international management research . Journal of Management16(2): 219-53.
45.
Ronen S. and Shenkar O. ( 1985) Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 10: 435-454.
46.
Runco MA and Johnson DJ ( 2002) Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity: a cross-cultural perspective. Creativity Research Journal14(3-4): 427-38.
47.
Schake LM ( 1998) The Schakes of La Charette: 1855-1996: http://www.rootsweb.com/~mowarren/schake/ part1b.html.
48.
Selznick P. ( 1956) Leadership in administration, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
49.
Sharma P., Chrisman JJ and Chua JH ( 2003) Succession planning as planned behavior: some empirical results. Family Business Review16(1): 1-15.
50.
Silvasti T. ( 2003) Bending borders of gendered labour division on farms: the case of Finland. Sociologia Ruralis43(2): 154-66.
51.
Smyrnios K, Tanewski G, Romano C, Karofsky P, Millen R and Yilmaz MR (2003) Work-family conflict: a study of American and Australian family businesses. Family Business Review16(1): 35-51.
52.
Stoy Hayward ( 1989) Staying the Course. London: Stoy Hayward.
53.
Tilgher A. ( 1930) Homo Faber: Work through the Ages, tr. DC Fisher . New York: Harcourt Brace.
54.
Tokarczyk J., Hansen E., Green M. and Down J. ( 2008) Considering ‘familiness’ in market orientations and success: a resource-based view. In: Gupta V, Levenburg N, Moore L, Motwani J, and Schwarz T (eds) Culturally-Sensitive Models of Family Business in Anglo Region: A Compendium Using the GLOBE Paradigm . Hyderabad, India: ICFAI University Press, 214-36.
55.
Uhlaner LM, van Goor-Balk HJM and Masurel E. ( 2004) Family business and corporate social responsibility in a sample of Dutch firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development11(2): 186-94.
56.
Useem M. ( 1996) Investor Capitalism: How Money Managers are Changing the Face of Corporate America. New York: Basic Books.
57.
Varamäki E., Pihkala T. and Routamaa V. ( 2003) Stages of transferring knowledge in small family business successions. Proceedings of Family Business Network 14th Annual World Conference, Lausanne.
58.
Weber M. ( 1904/5) Die protestantische Ethik und der ‘Geist’’ des Kapitalismus. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik20: 1-54 and 21: 1-110. Repr. in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie (1920), 17-206. Eng. tr.: The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, tr. Talcott Parsons. London: Routledge Classics, 1930 /2000.
