How new family CEOs use the structural setup they initially find to foster post-succession change in their family firms remains a theoretical and practical puzzle. Building on strategic change and family succession insights, we draw upon 74 interviews from 43 intra-family CEO successions to employ a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. We reveal three change-enabling solutions (authority, empowerment, and alignment) and develop a model of how new family CEOs navigate different structural setups. We add configurational insights to strategic change research in entrepreneurial organizations such as family firms, extend knowledge on new CEO power, and provide contingency factors to the role of new CEO distance.
AhrensJ.-P.CalabròA.HuybrechtsJ.WoywodeM. (2019). The enigma of the family successor–firm performance relationship: A methodological reflection and reconciliation attempt. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(3), 437–474.
2.
AhrensJ.-P.UhlanerL.WoywodeM.ZyburaJ. (2018). “Shadow emperor” or “Loyal Paladin”?—The Janus face of previous owner involvement in family firm successions. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9(1), 73–90.
3.
AmisJ.SlackT.HiningsC. R. (2004). The pace, sequence, and linearity of radical change. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 15–39.
4.
AndrusJ. L.ScoresbyR. B.LeeJ.RainvilleA. B.SmithR. M.SyedI. (2023). Taking charge as a contextual cue: How new CEO regulatory focus influences strategic change. Journal of Management, https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231206110.
5.
AnglinA. H.ReidS. W.ShortJ. C. (2023). More than one way to tell a story: A configurational Approach to storytelling in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(2), 461–494.
6.
BacqS.JanssenF.NoëlC. (2019). What happens next? A qualitative study of founder succession in social enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(3), 820–844.
7.
BasurtoX.SpeerJ. (2012). Structuring the calibration of qualitative data as sets for qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Field Methods, 24(2), 155–174.
8.
BattilanaJ.CasciaroT. (2012). Change agents, networks, and institutions: A contingency theory of organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 381–398.
9.
Berg-SchlosserD.De MeurG. (2009). Comparative research design: Case and variable selection. In RihouxB.RaginC. C. (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. 19–32). SAGE Publications, Inc.
10.
BettinazziE. L. M.JacqueminetA.NeumannK.SnoerenP. (2024). Media coverage of firms in the presence of multiple signals: A configurational approach. Academy of Management Journal, 67(1), 150–177.
11.
BigleyG. A.WiersemaM. F. (2002). New CEOs and corporate strategic refocusing: How experience as heir apparent influences the use of power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 707–727.
12.
BirkinshawJ.HamelG.MolM. J. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825–845.
13.
BjörnbergÅ.NicholsonN. (2012). Emotional ownership: The next generation’s relationship with the family firm. Family Business Review, 25(4): 374–390.
14.
BornhausenA. M.WulfT. (2024). Digital innovation in family firms: The roles of non-family managers and transgenerational control intentions. Small Business Economics, 62(4), 1429–1448.
15.
BuchananD.FitzgeraldL.KetleyD.GollopR.JonesJ. L.LamontL. L.NeathA.WhitbyB. (2005). No going back: A review of the literature on sustaining organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(3), 189–205.
16.
Cabrera-SuárezK.Saá-PérezP. D.García-AlmeidaD. (2001). The succession process from a resource- and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14(1), 37–46.
17.
ChiricoF.SalvatoC. (2008). Knowledge integration and dynamic organizational adaptation in family firms. Family Business Review, 21(2), 169–181.
18.
ChiuS. S.PathakS.HoskissonR. E.JohnsonR. A. (2022). Managerial commitment to the status quo and corporate divestiture: Can power motivate openness to change?The Leadership Quarterly, 33(3), 101459.
19.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–40.
20.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SteierL. P.RauS. B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1103–1113.
CornelissenJ.HöllererM. A.SeidlD. (2021). What theory is and can be: Forms of theorizing in organizational scholarship. Organization Theory, 2(3), 26317877211020328.
23.
CortesA. F.KissA. N. (2023). Is managerial discretion high in small firms? A theoretical framework. Small Business Economics, 60(1), 157–172.
24.
CrillyD. (2011). Predicting stakeholder orientation in the multinational enterprise: A mid-range theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 694–717.
25.
DaspitJ. J.HoltD. T.ChrismanJ. J.LongR. G. (2016). Examining family firm succession from a social exchange perspective: A multiphase, multistakeholder review. Family Business Review, 29(1), 44–64.
26.
DavisP. S.HarvestonP. D. (1999). In the founder’s shadow: Conflict in the family firm. Family Business Review, 12(4), 311–323.
27.
De BlockD.VisB. (2019). Addressing the challenges related to transforming qualitative into quantitative data in qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(4), 503–535.
28.
de GrooteJ. K.KammerlanderN. (2023). Breaking with the past to face the future? Organizational path dependence in family businesses. Organization Studies, 44(5), 713–737.
29.
De MassisA.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2008). Factors preventing intra-family succession. Family Business Review, 21(2), 183–199.
30.
De MassisA.EddlestonK. A.RovelliP. (2021). Entrepreneurial by design: How organizational design affects family and non-family firms’ opportunity exploitation. Journal of Management Studies, 58(1), 27–62.
31.
De MassisA.FrattiniF.KotlarJ.PetruzzelliA. M.WrightM. (2016). Innovation through tradition: Lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1), 93–116.
32.
De MassisA.KotlarJ. (2014). The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 15–29.
33.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.MazzolaP.MinolaT.SciasciaS. (2018). Conflicting selves: Family owners’ multiple goals and self-control agency problems in private firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(3), 362–389.
34.
DenisJ.-L.LangleyA.PineaultM. (2000). Becoming a leader in a complex organization. Journal of Management Studies, 37(8), 1063–1099.
35.
DeSantolaA.GulatiR. (2017). Scaling: Organizing and growth in entrepreneurial ventures. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 640–668.
36.
Diaz-MorianaV.ClintonE.KammerlanderN.LumpkinG. T.CraigJ. B. (2020). Innovation motives in family firms: A transgenerational view. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(2), 256–287.
37.
DouglasE. J.ShepherdD. A.PrenticeC. (2020). Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis for a finer-grained understanding of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(1), 105970.
38.
ErdoganI.RondiE.De MassisA. (2020). Managing the tradition and innovation paradox in family firms: A family imprinting perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(1), 20–54.
39.
FainshmidtS.WengerL.PezeshkanA.MallonM. R. (2019). When do dynamic capabilities lead to competitive advantage? The importance of strategic fit. Journal of Management Studies, 56(4), 758–787.
40.
FangH. C.ChrismanJ. J.HoltD. T. (2021). Strategic persistence in family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(4), 931–950.
41.
FinkelsteinS. (1992). Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 505–538.
42.
FinkelsteinS.HambrickD. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 484–503.
43.
FinkelsteinS.HambrickD. C.CannellaA. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford University Press.
44.
FissP. C. (2011). Building better casual theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420.
45.
FurnariS.CrillyD.MisangyiV. F.GreckhamerT.FissP. C.AguileraR. V. (2021). Capturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 46(4), 778–799.
46.
GilbertB. A.CampbellJ. T. (2015). The geographic origins of radical technological paradigms: A configurational study. Research Policy, 44(2), 311–327.
47.
GioiaD. A.ChittipeddiK. (1991). Sensemaking and sense giving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448.
48.
GoldenB. R. (1992). The past is the past—or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 848–860.
49.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.CruzC.BerroneP.De CastroJ. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 653–707.
50.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.
51.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.Sanchez-BuenoM. J.MiroshnychenkoI.WisemanR. M.Muñoz-BullónF.De MassisA. (2024). Family control, political risk and employment security: A cross-national study. Journal of Management Studies, 61(6), 2338–2372.
52.
GreckhamerT.FurnariS.FissP. C.AguileraR. V. (2018). Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization, 16(4), 482–495.
53.
GreckhamerT.MisangyiV. F.FissP. C. (2013). The two QCAs: From a small-N to a large-N set theoretic approach. In FissP. C.CambréB.MarxA. (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 38, pp. 49–75). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
54.
GubaE. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. ECTJ, 29(2), 75–91.
55.
HaefnerN.PalmiéM.LeppänenP. T. (2023). With(out) a little help from my friends? Reconciling incongruous findings on stakeholder management, innovation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(1), 142–171.
56.
HambrickD. C.FinkelsteinS. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 369–406.
57.
HambrickD. C.GeletkanyczM. A.FredricksonJ. W. (1993). Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 14(6), 401–418.
58.
HambrickD. C.MasonP. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.
59.
HambrickD. C.QuigleyT. J. (2014). Toward more accurate contextualization of the CEO effect on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 473–491.
60.
HandlerW. C. (1990). Succession in family firms: A mutual role adjustment between entrepreneur and next-generation family members. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(1), 37–52.
61.
HardyC. (1985). The nature of unobtrusive power. Journal of Management Studies, 22(4), 384–399.
62.
HauckJ.PrüglR. (2015). Innovation activities during intra-family leadership succession in family firms: An empirical study from a socioemotional wealth perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(2), 104–118.
63.
HillC. W. L.RothaermelF. T. (2003). The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 257–274.
64.
HowellT.BinghamC.HendricksB. (2022). Going alone or together? A configurational analysis of solo founding vs. cofounding. Organization Science, 33(6), 2421–2450.
65.
HuQ.HughesM. (2020). Radical innovation in family firms: A systematic analysis and research agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(6), 1199–1234.
66.
HutzschenreuterT.KleindienstI.GregerC. (2012). How new leaders affect strategic change following a succession event: A critical review of the literature. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 729–755.
67.
HuyQ. N.CorleyK. G.KraatzM. S. (2014). From support to mutiny: Shifting legitimacy judgments and emotional reactions impacting the implementation of radical change. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1650–1680.
68.
JaskiewiczP.CombsJ. G.RauS. B. (2015). Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 29–49.
69.
JudgeW. Q.HuH. W.GabrielssonJ.TalaulicarT.WittM. A.ZattoniA.López-IturriagaF.ChenJ. J.ShuklaD.QuttainahM.EmmanuelA. (2015). Configurations of capacity for change in entrepreneurial threshold firms: Imprinting and strategic choice perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 52(4), 506–530.
70.
Kaehr SerraC.ThielJ. (2019). Professionalizing entrepreneurial firms: Managing the challenges and outcomes of founder-CEO succession. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 13(3), 379–409.
71.
KanitzR.HuyQ. N.BackmannJ.HoeglM. (2022). No change is an island: How interferences between change initiatives evoke inconsistencies that undermine implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 65(2), 683–710.
72.
KaraevliA.ZajacE. J. (2013). When do outsider CEOs generate strategic change? The enabling role of corporate stability. Journal of Management Studies, 50(7), 1267–1294.
73.
KellyJ. N. (1980). Management transitions for newly appointed CEOs. Sloan Management Review (Pre-1986), 22(1), 37–45.
74.
Kets de VriesM. F. R. (1988). The dark side of CEO succession. Harvard Business Review, 66(1), 56–60.
75.
LauC.-M.WoodmanR. W. (1995). Understanding organizational change: A schematic perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 537–554.
76.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD.SteierL. P. (2004). Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 305–328.
77.
LeppänenP.GeorgeG.AlexyO. (2023). When do novel business models lead to high performance? A configurational approach to value drivers, competitive strategy, and firm environment. Academy of Management Journal, 66(1), 164–194.
78.
LewellynK. B.FainshmidtS. (2017). Effectiveness of CEO power bundles and discretion context: Unpacking the “fuzziness” of the CEO duality puzzle. Organization Studies, 38(11), 1603–1624.
79.
LinderC.LechnerC.PelzelF. (2020). Many roads lead to Rome: How human, social, and financial capital are related to new venture survival. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(5), 909–932.
80.
LitzR. A.KleysenR. F. (2001). Your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions: Toward a theory of family firm innovation with help from the Brubeck family. Family Business Review, 14(4), 335–351.
81.
LokP.HungR. Y.WalshP.WangP.CrawfordJ. (2005). An integrative framework for measuring the extent to which organizational variables influence the success of process improvement programs. Journal of Management Studies, 42(7), 1357–1381.
82.
MaS.KorY. Y.SeidlD. (2022). Top management team role structure: A vantage point for advancing upper echelons research. Strategic Management Journal, 43(8), O1–O28.
83.
MaS.SeidlD. (2018). New CEOs and their collaborators: Divergence and convergence between the strategic leadership constellation and the top management team. Strategic Management Journal, 39(3), 606–638.
84.
MaS.SeidlD.GuérardS. (2015). The new CEO and the post-succession process: An integration of past research and future directions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(4), 460–482.
85.
MarquesP.BikfalviA.BusquetF. (2022). A family imprinting approach to nurturing willing successors: Evidence from centennial family firms. Family Business Review, 35(3), 246–274.
86.
McMullenJ. S.WarnickB. J. (2015). To nurture or groom? The parent–founder succession dilemma. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(6), 1379–1412.
87.
MeyerA. D.TsuiA. S.HiningsC. R. (1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175–1195.
88.
MillerD. (1986). Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 7(3), 233–249.
89.
MillerD. (2018). Challenging trends in configuration research: Where are the configurations?Strategic Organization, 16(4), 453–469.
90.
MinichilliA.NordqvistM.CorbettaG.AmoreM. D. (2014). CEO succession mechanisms, organizational context, and performance: A socio-emotional wealth perspective on family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 51(7), 1153–1179.
MisangyiV. F.AcharyaA. G. (2014). Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1681–1705.
93.
MisangyiV. F.GreckhamerT.FurnariS.FissP. C.CrillyD.AguileraR. (2017). Embracing causal complexity: The emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. Journal of Management, 43(1), 255–282.
94.
MitchellJ. R.HartT. A.ValceaS.TownsendD. M. (2009). Becoming the boss: Discretion and postsuccession success in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(6), 1201–1218.
95.
MüllerJ.KunischS. (2018). Central perspectives and debates in strategic change research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 457–482.
96.
NasonR.VedulaS.BothelloJ.BacqS.CharmanA. (2024). Sight unseen: The visibility paradox of entrepreneurship in an informal economy. Journal of Business Venturing, 39(2), 106364.
97.
NeckebrouckJ.SchulzeW.ZellwegerT. (2018). Are family firms good employers?Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 553–585.
98.
NordqvistM.WennbergK.BaùM.HellerstedtK. (2012). An entrepreneurial process perspective on succession in family firms. Small Business Economics, 40(4), 1087–1122.
99.
OregS.BersonY. (2019). Leaders’ impact on organizational change: Bridging theoretical and methodological chasms. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 272–307.
100.
PahnkeA.WelterF. (2019). The German Mittelstand: Antithesis to silicon valley entrepreneurship?Small Business Economics, 52(2), 345–358.
101.
ParkY.FissP. C.El SawyO. A. (2020). Theorizing the multiplicity of digital phenomena: The ecology of configurations, causal recipes, and guidelines for applying QCA. MIS Quarterly, 44(4), 1493–1520.
102.
PettigrewA. M. (1987). Context and action in the transformation of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 24(6), 649–670.
103.
QuerbachS.BirdM.KraftP. S.KammerlanderN. (2020). When the former CEO stays on board: The role of the predecessor’s board retention for product innovation in family firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(2), 184–207.
104.
QuigleyT. J.HambrickD. C. (2012). When the former CEO stays on as board chair: Effects on successor discretion, strategic change, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(7), 834–859.
105.
RawhouserH.SutterC.HolzaepfelN.CongerM.NewbertS. L. (2025). Knowledge-related resourcefulness for growth in weak entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 49(1), 159–195.
106.
RaffertyA. E.JimmiesonN. L.ArmenakisA. A. (2013). Change readiness: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 39(1), 110–135.
107.
RaginC. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
108.
RiarF. J.WiedelerC.KammerlanderN.KellermannsF. W. (2022). Venturing motives and venturing types in entrepreneurial families: A corporate entrepreneurship perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(1), 44–81.
109.
RomanelliE.TushmanM. L. (1994). Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1141–1166.
110.
RönkköM.MaulaM.WennbergK. (2025). Qualitative comparative analysis in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587251315654.
111.
SalvatoC.ChiricoF.MelinL.SeidlD. (2019). Coupling family business research with organization studies: Interpretations, issues and insights. Organization Studies, 40(6), 775–791.
112.
SantosS. C.CaetanoA.BrochadoA. (2023). Why am I so successful? Self-presentation and deliberative attributions of success in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 19, e00396.
113.
SasakiI.KotlarJ.RavasiD.VaaraE. (2020). Dealing with revered past: Historical identity statements and strategic change in Japanese family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 41(3), 590–623.
114.
SaylorsR.LahiriA.WarnickB.BaidC. (2023). Looking back to venture forward: Exploring idea and identity work in public failure narratives. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(2), 398–429.
115.
SchepkerD. J.KimY.PatelP. C.ThatcherS. M. B.CampionM. C. (2017). CEO succession, strategic change, and post-succession performance: A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(6), 701–720.
116.
SchückesM.UngerB.GutmannT.FelsG. (2025). Innovation at the interface: A configurational approach to corporate venture capital. Journal of Business Venturing, 40(1), 106438.
117.
ShanineK. K.MadisonK.CombsJ. G.EddlestonK. A. (2023). Parenting the successor: It starts at home and leaves an enduring impact on the family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(4), 1093–1131.
118.
SharmaP.IrvingP. G. (2005). Four bases of family business successor commitment: Antecedents and consequences. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 13–33.
119.
SingaramR.KraaijenbrinkJ.GartnerW. B. (2024). No simple way to say goodbye! Untangling the heterogeneity of social venture founder exit intention. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 48(2), 613–644.
120.
ShenW.CannellaA. A. (2002). Revisiting the performance consequences of CEO succession: The impacts of successor type, postsuccession senior executive turnover, and departing CEO tenure. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 717–733.
121.
SkorodziyevskiyV.SherlockC.SuE.ChrismanJ. J.DibrellC. (2024). Strategic change in family firms: A review from an institutional environment and firm size perspective. Family Business Review, 37(1), 130–160.
122.
SolarinoA. M.AguinisH. (2021). Challenges and best-practice recommendations for designing and conducting interviews with elite informants. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 649–672.
123.
StoutenJ.RousseauD. M.De CremerD. (2018). Successful organizational change: Integrating the management practice and scholarly literatures. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 752–788.
124.
SuddabyR.SilvermanB. S.JaskiewiczP.De MassisA.MicelottaE. R. (2023). History-informed family business research: An editorial on the promise of history and memory work. Family Business Review, 36(1), 4–16.
TóthZ.HennebergS. C.NaudéP. (2017). Addressing the “qualitative” in fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis: The generic membership evaluation template. Industrial Marketing Management, 63, 192–204.
127.
TurnerS. F.CardinalL. B.BurtonR. M. (2017). Research design for mixed methods: A triangulation-based framework and roadmap. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 243–267.
128.
VaccaroI. G.JansenJ. J. P.Van Den BoschF. A. J.VolberdaH. W. (2012). Management innovation and leadership: The moderating role of organizational size. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 28–51.
129.
VillaniE.LinderC.De MassisA.EddlestonK. A. (2024). Employee incentives and family firm innovation: A configurational approach. Journal of Management, 50(5), 1797–1835.
130.
ViranyB.TushmanM. L.RomanelliE. (1992). Executive succession and organization outcomes in turbulent environments: An organization learning approach. Organization Science, 3(1), 72–91.
131.
VuoriT. O.HuyQ. N. (2016). Distributed attention and shared emotions in the innovation process: How Nokia lost the smartphone battle. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(1), 9–51.
132.
WagenschwanzA. M.GrimesM. G. (2021). Navigating compromise: How founder authenticity affects venture identification amidst organizational hybridity. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(2), 106085.
133.
WaldkirchM. (2019). Non-family CEOs in family firms: Spotting gaps and challenging assumptions for a future research agenda. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 11(1), 100305.
134.
WaldkirchM.KammerlanderN.WiedelerC. (2021). Configurations for corporate venture innovation: Investigating the role of the dominant coalition. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(5), 106137.
135.
WangW.EddlestonK. A.ChiricoF.ZhangS. X.LiangQ.DengW. (2023). Family diversity and business start-up: Do family meals feed the fire of entrepreneurship?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(4), 1265–1297.
136.
WassermanN. (2003). Founder-CEO succession and the paradox of entrepreneurial success. Organization Science, 14(2), 149–172.
137.
WassermanN. (2017). The throne versus the kingdom: Founder control and value creation in startups. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 255–277.
138.
WhittleA.ReissnerS. (2024). Making knowledge claims from qualitative interviews: A typology of epistemological modes. British Journal of Management, 36(1), 3–16.
139.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed,). SAGE Publications, Inc.
140.
Yli-RenkoH.DenooL.JanakiramanR. (2020). A knowledge-based view of managing dependence on a key customer: Survival and growth outcomes for young firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(6), 106045.
141.
ZellwegerT. M.AstrachanJ. H. (2008). On the emotional value of owning a firm. Family Business Review, 21(4), 347–363.
142.
ZyburaJ.ZyburaN.AhrensJ.-P.WoywodeM. (2021). Innovation in the post-succession phase of family firms: Family CEO successors and leadership constellations as resources. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(2), 100336.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
