Abstract
This methodological article takes Fredrik Barth’s anthropology of knowledge as a point of departure and identifies culture as knowledge shared above a specified threshold. The method samples domains of knowledge in organizational settings and asks diverse members of the organization to list the elements of the domains. After compiling the elements, the informants are re-interviewed, along with a wider sample, to prioritize the elements according to a criterion of importance. A consensus analysis of the informants’ data matrix reveals the degree to which the knowledge is shared and constitutes a culture, or is less shared and constitutes a proto-culture, subculture, counter-culture, or a fragmented and idiosyncratic domain. Three case studies are used as illustrations. Widely adaptable in international management research for exploring organizational cultures and subcultures, inter-organizational fields, and international ventures, the consensus analysis method articulates with the three major theoretical perspectives on culture, the integration, differentiation, and fragmentation perspectives.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
