This article interrogates the dissent by Justice Sonia Sotomayor in Utah v. Strieff, a Fourth Amendment case on lawful police searches, to track the political assumptions that undergird conceptions of the legal boundaries of police search and seizures. Specifically, the author examines how the vestiges of slavery structure both the constitutive elements of how bodily autonomy and freedom from physical invasion is understood under the law. Thus, by employing critical Black Studies in tension with affect theory, this article questions what limits are present in the law that reify, even or especially through dissent, the ontological arrangements of slavery and its afterlife.
MarriottD (2000) On Black Men. New York: Columbia University Press.
8.
MassumiB (2010) The future birth of the affective fact: The political ontology of threat. In: The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9.
MichelleA (2010) The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.
10.
PalmerTS (2017) ‘What feels more than feeling?’: Theorizing the unthinkability of Black affect. Critical Ethnic Studies3(2): 31–56.
