This article examines the role of animation in early instructional medical films through close analysis of the films produced by the collaboration between the American College of Surgeons (ACS) and Eastman Kodak in the late 1920s. The ACS placed medical motion pictures at the center of surgical training and thus established moving images as fundamental to the practice of medicine. These films made extensive use of animation to present surgical sequences that were otherwise impossible to capture on film. By adopting the motion picture as an educational tool, the physician–filmmakers actively constructed medical reality through representations that depended on artifice to convey objective scientific truths. ‘Actual photography’ and animation were blended to visualize the invisible and simplify explanations by reducing the information contained in the visual image. The films simultaneously demonstrate how the motion picture camera served as a tool for medical documentation, training both their objects (the patients) and their subjects (the doctors) in the process.
AckermanMJ (2006) Anatomy in the digital age. In: RifkinBAAckermanMJ (eds) Human Anatomy (From the Renaissance to the Digital Age). New York: Abrams, 319–330.
2.
American College of Surgeons Board of Regents (1927) Minutes, 4October, ACS Archives, Chicago, IL.
3.
American College of Surgeons (1930) ACS Year Book, 1930: 91–98. Eleanor K. Grimm Records 20, reel I/1, page 7, attachment, ACS Archives, Chicago, IL.
4.
‘Announcing Eastman Medical Films’ (c. 1929) Committee on Medical Motion Pictures, Correspondence and Data on Films, 1926-97 RG5/SG2/S2 Box 3, Folder – Eastman-Kodak Co., Correspondence and Catalogs, 1931–1955. American College of Surgeons Archives, Chicago, IL.
5.
BazinA (1967) The myth of total cinema. In: What Is Cinema 2, trans. and ed. GrayH. Berkeley: University of California Press, 23–27.
6.
BellowsAMMcDougallMBergB (eds) (2000) Science Is Fiction: The Films of Jean Painlevé. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
BirminghamFA (1976) Dr. Frank H. Netter: Michelangelo of medicine. Saturday Evening Post, May/June: 62–77.
8.
BoonT (2008) Films of Fact: A History of Science in Documentary Films and Television. London: Wallflower Press.
9.
BrewsterJR (1944) Encyclopedia Britannica Films, Inc. letter to Eleanor K. Grimm, Secretary, Board of Regents, American College of Surgeons, 10October, ACS Archives.
10.
CartwrightL (1995) Screening the Body: Tracing Medicine’s Visual Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11.
CavellS (1979) The World Viewed, enlarged edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
CraftonD (1982) Before Mickey: The Animated Film 1898–1928. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
CurtisS (2004) Still/moving: Digital imaging and medical hermeneutics. In: RabinovitzLGeilA (eds) Memory Bytes: History, Technology, and Digital Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 218–254.
14.
DansPE (2000) Doctors in the Movies: Boil the Water and Just Say Aah. Bloomington, IL: Medi-Ed Press.
15.
DastonLGalisonP (1992) The image of objectivity. Representations40: 81–123.
16.
DastonLGalisonP (2007) Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
‘Eastman Classroom Films Given to University of Chicago’ (1944), Memorandum 14April: Committee on Medical Motion Pictures, Correspondence and Data on Films, 1926–97 RG5/SG2/S2 Box 3, Davis & Geck correspondence to Eaton Laboratories, Folder Eastman Kodak Co. 1931–55 Correspondence and Catalogs.
19.
FayJ (2008) Seeing/loving animals: André Bazin’s posthumanism. journal of visual culture7(1): 41–64.
20.
GayckenO (2008) Review of Thierry Lefebvre. La Chair et le celluloïd: le cinéma chirurgical du docteur Doyen (Brionne: Jean Doyen, 2004). Med Hist. 52(1): 155–156.
GrossLKatzJSRubyJ (eds) (1988) Image Ethics: The Moral Rights of Subjects in Photographs, Film, and Television. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
KevlesBH (1997) Naked to the Bone: Medical Imaging in the Twentieth Century. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
24.
KraussR (2005) ‘The Rock’: William Kentridge’s drawings for projection. In: GehmanCReinkeS (eds) The Sharpest Point: Animation at the End of Cinema. Toronto:: YYZ Books, 96–125.
25.
LandeckerH (2000) Immortality, in vitro: A history of the HeLa Cell Line. In BrodwinP (ed.) Biotechnology and Culture: Bodies, Anxieties, Ethics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 53–74.
26.
LandeckerH (2012, this issue) The life of movement: From microcinematography to live-cell imaging. journal of visual culture11(3), Special Issue on Science and Documentary.
27.
LedererS (1995) Subjected to Science: Human Experimentation in America before the Second World War. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28.
LedererS (1998) Repellent subjects: Hollywood censorship and surgical images in the 1930s. Literature and Medicine17(1): 91–113.
29.
LedererS (2007) Hollywood and human experimentation: Representing medical research in popular film. In: ReaganLJ. (eds) Medicine’s Moving Pictures. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 282–306.
30.
LernerB (2004) Beyond informed consent: Did patients challenge their physicians in the post-world war II era?Journal of the History of Medicine59(4): 507–521.
31.
LippitA (2008) Electric Animal: Toward a Rhetoric of Wildlife. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
OstherrK (2005) Cinematic Prophylaxis: Globalization and Contagion in the Discourse of World Health. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
36.
OstherrK (2012a) Medical education through Film: Animating anatomy at the American College of Surgeons and Eastman Kodak. In: StreibleD. (eds) Learning with the Lights Off: A Reader in Educational Film. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
OstherrK (2012b) Cinema as universal language of health education: Translating science in Unhooking the Hookworm (1920). In: AndersonNDietrichM (eds) The Educated Eye: Visual Culture and Pedagogy in the Life Sciences. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
38.
PernickM (1996) The Black Stork: Eugenics and the Death of ‘Defective’ Babies in American Medicine and Motion Pictures since 1915. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
ReiserSJ (1978) Medicine and the Reign of Technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
ReiserSJ (2009) Technological Medicine: The Changing World of Doctors and Patients. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
RenovM (2004) The Subject of Documentary. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
42.
RohenJ (2006) Color Atlas of Anatomy: A Photographic Study of the Human Body, 6th edn.Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins.
Van DijckJ (2005) The Transparent Body: A Cultural Analysis of Medical Imaging. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
50.
WaldbyC (2000) The Visible Human Project: Informatic Bodies and Posthuman Medicine. New York: Routledge.
51.
WellmannJ (2010) The Form of Becoming: A Cultural History of Embryology, 1760–1830. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.
52.
WilliamsL (1986) Film body: An implantation of perversions. In: RosenP (ed.) Narrative, Apparatus, Ideology A Film Theory Reader. New York: Columbia University Press, 507–534.
53.
WinstonB (1988) The tradition of the victim in Griersonian documentary. In: GrossL. (eds) Image Ethics: The Moral Rights of Subjects in Photographs, Film and Television. New York: Oxford University Press, 34–57.
