This study argues for a distinction between visual art and visual image in our understanding and analysis of visual communication. Referring to the social semiotic model of verbal art by Ruqaiya Hasan, the study proposes a semiotic system of visual art, which is related to, but distinct from the semiotic system of visual image. In the semiotic system of visual image, lines and shapes rendered through various techniques depict entities that serve three functions: the representational, modal and compositional functions. In the semiotic system of visual art, symbolic configuration endows the visually shown entities with deeper, more abstract meanings by creating recurrent patterns in the visual art as a genre, against its artistic and cultural conventions. These meanings help to realize the theme: it is what a work of visual art is about when dissociated from the particularities of that work. By way of illustration, an empirical study on the landscape painting in dynastic China is provided, with a focus on the embedded human figures and how they contribute to the theme of the paintings.
BushSShihHY (1985) Early Chinese Texts on Painting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
BushS (2012) The Chinese Literati on Painting: Su Shih (1037–1101) to Tung Ch’i-ch’ang (1555–1636). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
7.
FongWC (1962) The problem of forgeries in Chinese painting. Part one. Artibus Asiae25(2/3): 95–119, 121–140.
8.
FongWC (1992) Beyond Representation, Chinese Painting and Calligraphy, 8th–14th Century. New York, NY: Metropolitan Museum of Art.
9.
HasanR (1985) Linguistics, Language and Verbal Art. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.
10.
HasanR (2011a) Private pleasure, public discourse: Reflections on engaging with literature. In: Selected Works of Ruqaiya Hasan on Applied Linguistics. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 398–426.
11.
HasanR (2011b) A timeless journey: On the past and future of present knowledge. In: Selected Works of Ruqaiya Hasan on Applied Linguistics. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, xiv–xliii.
12.
HayJ (2005) The functions of Chinese painting: Toward a unified field theory. In: WestermannM (ed.) Anthropologies of Art. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 111–123.
13.
HoPT (2019) The Ladder of Success in Imperial China: Aspects of Social Mobility, 1368–1911. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
14.
KangTH, et al. (2023) Influence of figure information on attention distribution in Chinese landscape painting. Heliyon9(4): 1–10.
15.
KressGVan LeeuwenT (2021[1996/2006]) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
16.
LawSS (2024) Reading Chinese Painting: Beyond Forms and Colors, a Comparative Approach to Art Appreciation, trans. Blishen.TShanghai: Shanghai Press.
17.
LeggeJ (1962) (trans.) The Texts of Taoism. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
18.
LiFKelloggD (2021) Literature text as world reversing: Reversed worlding in a translation of verbal art. Target35(1): 97–115.
19.
LinRJZaiQH (2023) The Collection of Point of View Embedded in Landscape Paintings in Different Dynasties: The Scenery Related to Figures–Fishing, Chopping, Farming and Reading [历代山水点景图谱:人文景·渔樵耕读]. Shanghai: Shanghai Calligraphy and Painting Publishing House.
20.
LiuX (2021) The Pictorial Meaning and Point Scene Figures in the Landscape Painting of Ma Yuan [马远山水画点景人物与画意研究]. Master’s thesis, Shaanxi Normal University, China.
21.
LuS (2018) Aesthetic function and interest of the characters in landscape painting [山水衬景人物的审美功能和意趣]. Nanjing Yishu Xueyuan Xuebao (Meishu yu Sheji) 4: 114–119, 210.
MillerDR (2010) The Hasanian framework for the study of ‘verbal art’ revisited . . . and reproposed. Textus23: 71–94.
24.
MiyazakiN (2018) The Profound Meaning of Chinese Pictures, trans. FuYY. Changsha: Hunan Literature and Art Publishing House.
25.
MukařovskýJ (1976a) The essence of the visual arts. In: MatejkaLTitunukIR (eds.) Semiotics of Art: Prague School Contributions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 229–244.
26.
MukařovskýJ (1976b) Art as semiotic fact. In: MatejkaLTitunukIR (eds.) Semiotics of Art: Prague School Contributions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3–9.
27.
O’HaganLA (2024). In search of the social in social semiotics: A historical perspective. Social Semiotics34(4): 634–655.
28.
O’TooleM (1990) A systemic–functional semiotics of art. Semiotica82(3/4): 185–210.
29.
O’TooleM (2005) Pushing out the boundaries: Designing a systemic-functional model for non-European visual arts. Linguistics and the Human Sciences1(1): 83–97.
30.
O’TooleM (2011[1994]) The Language of Displayed Art. New York, NY: Routledge.
The Palace Museum (2018) The Palace Museum Huapu: Point of View [故宫画谱:点景]. Beijing: The Palace Museum Publishing House.
33.
Plato (1993[c. 375 BC]) Republic, trans. WaterfieldR (Oxford’s World Classics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
RileyH (2004) Perceptual modes, semiotic codes, social mores: A contribution towards a social semiotics of drawing. Visual Communication3(3): 294–315.
35.
SickmanLSoperA (1971) The Art and Architecture of China. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36.
SullivanM (2007) The gift of distance: Chinese landscape painting as a source of inspiration. Southwest Review92(3): 407–419.
37.
SzeMM (1956) The Tao of Painting: A Study of the Ritual Disposition of Chinese Painting with a Translation of the Chieh Tzŭ Yüan Hua Chuan or Mustard Seed Garden Manual of Painting 1679–1701. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
38.
WangBM (2010) The Discussion on Landscape Painting [山水画纵横谈]. Jinan: Shandong Fine Arts Publishing House.
39.
WeiH (2017) The Study on Point Paintings of Traditional Landscape Painting [古代山水画点景研究]. PhD dissertation, Shaanxi Normal University, China.
40.
XingXJ (2023) A Study of Dotted Human Figures of the Landscape Painting in Song Dynasty [两宋山水画点景人物研究]. PhD dissertation, Harbin Normal University, China.
41.
YangYN (2012) The relationship between a visual art and its cultural background: A comparative analysis ofEarly Spring and The Hay Wain. Linguistics and the Human Sciences5(2): 225–245.
42.
YuHC (2021) The influence of Confucianism and Daoism on the changes of Chinese painting theories. Synthesis Philosophica36(2): 257–276.
43.
ZhangEM (2016) Point of View Character and Landscape Paintings [点景人物与山水画研究]. Master’s thesis, Zhengzhou University, China.
44.
ZhangLX (2013) Nature and landscape in the Chinese tradition. In: ChengPFanK (eds.) New Perspectives on the Research of Chinese Culture. Singapore: Springer, 1–15.
45.
ZhangYL (2021) The Scene of Painting with Figures: Study on the Compositional Ways and Representative Forms of Figures in Landscape Painting [有人之境—山水画中人物点景的组织方法与表现形式研究]. Master’s thesis, Shanghai Normal University, China.
46.
ZhaoT (2017) The Evolution and Characteristics of the Characters in Chinese Landscape Painting [中国山水画中‘人物图形象’演变及特征研究]. Master’s thesis, Hunan Normal University, China.
