This study examines the intricate interplay between identity construction and multimodal communication in the evolving landscape of Virtual Influencers (VIs), with a particular focus on Lil Miquela. It addresses a critical gap in understanding how algorithmic infrastructures mediate identity performance through complex semiotic and chronotopic configurations. Adopting a techno-affective and social semiotic approach, the research conducts a chronotopic analysis of 35 (sponsored) posts from Lil Miquela’s official Instagram account (21 January–June 2024), integrating Bakhtin’s chronotope with Danesi’s semiotic model. Guided by three key questions, the article explores: (1) the role of emojis as semiotic resources in her digital identity construction; (2) the mediation of her spatiotemporal identity dynamics by algorithmic infrastructures; and (3) the relationship between multimodal affordances, techno-affective elements and perceptions of authenticity. By interrogating the intersection of chronotopic configurations, algorithmic mediation and digital semiotics, this research reveals how her identity is continuously (re)negotiated in response to shifting algorithmic and socio-discursive conditions. Ultimately, it contributes to a deeper understanding of how VIs navigate digital authenticity and identity performance within the constraints and affordances of algorithmic mediation.
AghaA (2007) Chronotopes and the temporal organization of social life. Discourse in Society18(4): 459–491.
2.
AhmedS (2014) Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
3.
ArsenyanJMirowskaA (2021) Almost human? A comparative case study on the social media presence of virtual influencers. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies155. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102694.
4.
BakhtinM (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
5.
BelkR (1988) Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research15(2): 139–168. DOI: 10.1086/209154.
6.
BelkR (2013) Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research40(3): 477–500. DOI: 10.1086/671052.
7.
BelkR (2018) Ownership: The extended self and the extended object. In: PeckJShuSB (eds) Psychological Ownership and Consumer Behavior. London: Routledge, 53–67.
8.
BelkR (2022) Extended Self in a Digital World. London: Routledge.
9.
BelkR (2024) Apples, oranges, and self. Journal of Marketing Management40(7/8): 569–578. DOI: 10.1080/0267257x.2024.2346016.
10.
BjerringJCBuschJ (2024) Artificial intelligence and identity: The rise of the statistical individual. AI & Society. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01877-4.
11.
BlackledgeACreeseA (2017) Heteroglossia as Practice and Pedagogy. New York, NY: Springer.
12.
BlockELovegroveR (2021) Discordant storytelling, ‘honest fakery’, identity peddling: How uncanny CGI characters are jamming public relations and influencer practices. Public Relations Inquiry10(3): 265–293. DOI: 10.1177/2046147x211026936.
13.
BlommaertJ (2010) The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
BlommaertJDe FinaA (2017) Chronotopes, Discourse, and Meaning: A Theoretical Framework. London: Routledge.
15.
BlommaertJDongJ (2010) Ethnographic Fieldwork: A Beginner’s Guide. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
16.
ByunKJAhnSJ (2023) A systematic review of virtual influencers: Similarities and differences between human and virtual influencers in interactive advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising23(2). DOI: 10.1080/15252019.2023.2236102.
17.
CanagarajahS (2015) Translingual Practice: Global Englishes and Cosmopolitan Relations. London: Routledge.
18.
DanesiM (2016) The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
19.
Da Silva OliveiraABChimentiP (2021) ‘Humanized robots’: A proposition of categories to understand virtual influencers. Australasian Journal of Information Systems25. DOI: 10.3127/ajis.v25i0.3223.
20.
DovchinS (2019) Translingual practices in social media: An exploration of the role of emojis in identity performance. Language & Communication68: 11–21.
21.
EkaraAN (2024) A virtual character, a robot, or a human being? A study of the (self-)representations of Lil Miquela. Cairo Studies in English1: 130–149. DOI: 10.21608/cse.2024.286506.1161.
22.
ElyamanyN (2023) A chronotopic approach to identity performance in musical numbers: A choreo-musical case study of ‘Rewrite the Stars’ and ‘This Is Me’. Visual Communication22(2): 278–296. DOI: 10.1177/1470357220974069.
23.
ElyamanyN (2025) Virtual identity construction in translanguaging spaces: Unveiling the semiotic power of emojis in Lil Miquela’s Instagram posts. Visual Studies. DOI: 10.1080/1472586X.2025.2463516.
24.
ElyamanyNAbbasN (2025) Femvertising, Post-Feminism, and Virtual Influencers at Play: A Linguistic Analysis of Lil Miquela’s Instagram Posts (2016–2023). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
ElyamanyNYoussefYOEl-KarefN (2025) From a pixelated avatar to an authentic spatialized iSelf: A multimodal study of Lil Miquela’s virtual identity performance in Instagram. AI & Society: Knowledge, Culture and Communication 12(1): 189–95.
26.
FaddoulGChatterjeeS (2020) A quantitative measurement model for persuasive technologies using storytelling via a virtual narrator. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction36(17): 1585–1604. DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2020.1768670.
27.
FernandesC, et al (2022) Digital entrepreneurship platforms: Mapping the field and looking towards a holistic approach. Technology in Society70: 101979. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101979.
28.
FisherE (2022) Algorithms and Subjectivity: The Subversion of Critical Knowledge. London: Routledge.
29.
GeSHerringSC (2018) Emoji sequences as speech acts: A study of Weibo comments. Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. DOI: 10.1145/3173574.3174126.
30.
Guinez-CabreraNAquevequeC (2022) Entrepreneurial influencers and influential entrepreneurs: Two sides of the same coin. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research28(1): 231–254. DOI: 10.1108/ijebr-08-2020-0563.
31.
HafnerCA (2021) Discourse and computer-mediated communication. In: HylandK, et al (eds) The Bloomsbury Handbook of Discourse Analysis2: 281–294.
32.
Haikel-ElsabehM (2023) Virtual influencers versus real influencers advertising in the metaverse: Understanding the perceptions and interactions with users. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising44(3): 252–273. DOI: 10.1080/10641734.2023.2218420.
33.
HeJ (2023) Sharing emotions or/and making allies: The emoji’s interpersonal function in Chinese social media news comments. Social Semiotics33(5): 1131–1146.
JinSVViswanathanV (2024) “Threatened and empty selves following AI-based virtual influencers”: Comparison between followers and non-followers of virtual influencers in AI-driven digital marketing. AI & Society40, 117–131.
36.
KarimzadF (2021) Chronotopes, normativity, and identity: An ethnographic perspective. Journal of Cultural Studies23(4): 201–220.
37.
KimMKimJ (2023) How an online gaming community advertises brands to members: The roles of relational bonds and trust transfer. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising44(3): 274–294. DOI: 10.1080/10641734.2023.2191117.
38.
KonradAMcCullochGThompsonL (2020) Emoji as paralinguistic tools: Enhancing digital communication. Social Media + Society6(2). DOI: 10.1177/2056305120913590.
KozinetsRVGambettiR (2021) Netnography Unlimited: Understanding Technoculture Using Qualitative Social Media Research. London: Routledge.
41.
KrugerJ, et al (2005) Egocentric perceptions of bias in others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology88(3): 377–396. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.377.
42.
LiW (2018) Translanguaging Spaces: Language, Bilingualism, and Education. London: Routledge.
43.
LogiLZappavignaM (2021) A social semiotic perspective on emoji: How emoji and language interact to make meaning in digital messages. New Media & Society. DOI: 10.1177/14614448211032965.
44.
LouC, et al (2023) Authentically fake? How consumers respond to the influence of virtual influencers. Journal of Advertising52(4): 540–557. DOI: 10.1080/00913367.2022.2149641.
MoustakasE, et al (2020) Blurring lines between fiction and reality: Perspectives of experts on marketing effectiveness of virtual influencers. In: 2020 International Conference on Cyber Security and Protection of Digital Services (Cyber Security). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/CyberSecurity49315.2020.9138861.
47.
MrádMRamadanZNasrLI (2022) Computer-generated influencers: The rise of digital personalities. Marketing Intelligence & Planning40(5): 589–603. DOI: 10.1108/mip-12-2021-0423.
48.
OhCSBailensonJNWelchGF (2018) A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI5:114. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00114.
49.
ParkwellC (2019) Emoji as social semiotic resources for meaning-making in discourse: Mapping the functions of the toilet emoji in Cher’s tweets about Donald Trump. Discourse, Context & Media30. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100307: 100307.
50.
RiedlR, et al (2014) Trusting humans and avatars: A brain imaging study based on evolution theory. Journal of Management Information Systems30(4): 83–113. DOI: 10.2753/mis0742-1222300404.
51.
SandsS, et al (2022a) False idols: Unpacking the opportunities and challenges of falsity in the context of virtual influencers. Business Horizons65(6): 777–788. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2022.08.002.
52.
SandsS, et al (2022b) Unreal influence: Leveraging AI in influencer marketing. European Journal of Marketing56(6): 1721–1747. DOI: 10.1108/ejm-12-2019-0949.
53.
SöffnerJ (2024) Virtualism: How AI replaces reality. AI & Society. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01999-9.
54.
ThomasVLFowlerK (2021) Close encounters of the AI kind: Use of AI influencers as brand endorsers. Journal of Advertising50(1): 11–25. DOI: 10.1080/00913367.2020.1810595.
UmN (2023) Predictors affecting effects of virtual influencer advertising among college students. Sustainability15: 6388. DOI: 10.3390/su15086388.
57.
WangPXKimSKimM (2023) Robot anthropomorphism and job insecurity: The role of social comparison. Journal of Business Research164. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114003.
58.
WattanasuwanK (2005) The self and symbolic consumption. Journal of American Academy of Business6(1): 179–184.
59.
YanXMoTZhouX (2024) The influence of cultural differences between China and the West on moral responsibility judgment of virtual humans. Acta Psychologica Sinica56(2): 161–178. DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1041.2024.00161.
60.
YuJ, et al (2024) Artificial intelligence-generated virtual influencer: Examining the effects of emotional display on user engagement. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103560.
61.
ZhangDVoorveldHBoermanSC (2023) Privacy concerns matter, knowledge does not: Investigating effects of online behavioral advertising among Chinese and Dutch adults. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising44(3): 392–410. DOI: 10.1080/10641734.2023.2199812.
62.
ZhangWRodgersS (2023) Linking ethnicity targeting with artificial intelligence and data collection: Perceptions and behavioral responses of Black consumers. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising44(3): 373–391. DOI: 10.1080/10641734.2023.2212022.
63.
ZhaoSFlewittR (2020) Young Chinese immigrant children’s language and literacy practices on social media: A translanguaging perspective. Language and Education34(3): 267–285.
