The assessment of conceptual knowledge presents a challenge, particularly at the university level, at which large class size precludes individual assessment for assessment through multiple-choice examinations. This practitioner essay sets forth an alternative format: the use of cartoon illustration as a tool for the assessment of students’ conceptual knowledge. The context is an upper-division (third- and fourth-year students) psychology class at an American public research university. Student artwork is included, past research is discussed, and implications for the future are considered.
AzmanN., et al. (2016) Academic promotion in Malaysian public universities: A critical look at issues and challenges. Oxford Review of Education42(1): 71–88.
2.
ChuR. (2016) Altering testing styles in biology courses to emphasize the application of course content. Catalyst: Facets of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences1(1).
3.
DemblingB.P., et al. (2002) Effect of geographic migration on SMI prevalence estimates. Mental Health Services Research4(1): 7–12.
4.
FairburnC. (1981) A cognitive behavioural approach to the treatment of bulimia. Psychological Medicine11(4): 707–711.
5.
FairburnC.G. (1997) Eating disorders. In: ClarkD.MFairburnC.G. (eds) Science and Practice of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. New York: Oxford University Press, 209–243.
6.
FairburnC.G. (2008) Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders. New York: Guilford Press.
7.
FarisR.E.LDunhamH.W. (1939) Mental Disorders in Urban Areas: An Ecological Study of Schizophrenia and Other Psychoses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
GoubeaudK. (2010) How is science learning assessed at the postsecondary level? Assessment and grading practices in college biology, chemistry and physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology19(3): 237–245.
9.
HuntD.D. (2012) Technology and course management systems. In: HuntD.D. (ed.) The New Nurse Educator: Mastering Academe. New York: Springer, 109–120.
10.
IonG.Castro CeaceroD. (2017) Transitions in the manifestations of the research culture of Spanish universities. Higher Education Research & Development36(2): 311–324. doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1208153
11.
MartinezM.E. (1999) Cognition and the question of test item format. Educational Psychologist34: 207–218.
12.
McConnellD.A, et al. (2005) How students think: Implications for learning in introductory geoscience courses. Journal of Geoscience Education53(4): 462–470.
13.
MowrerO. (1947) On the dual nature of learning: A re-interpretation of conditioning and problem-solving. Harvard Educational Review17: 102–148.
MowrerO.H. (1956) Two-factor learning theory reconsidered, with special reference to secondary reinforcement and the concept of habit. Psychological Review63(2): 114.
16.
MutonyiH.KendrickM.E. (2011) Cartoon drawing as a means of accessing what students know about HIV/AIDS: An alternative method. Visual Communication10(2): 231–249.
17.
O’MearaK.RiceE.R. (2005) Faculty Priorities Reconsidered: Rewarding Multiple Forms of Scholarship. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
ReissM.BoulterCTunnicliffeS.D. (2007) Seeing the natural world: A tension between pupils’ diverse conceptions as revealed by their visual representations and monolithic science lessons. Visual Communication6(1): 99–114.
19.
Rowley-JolivetE. (2004) Different visions, different visuals: A social semiotic analysis of field-specific visual composition in scientific conference presentations. Visual Communication3(2): 145–175.
20.
SariaslanA, et al. (2016) Schizophrenia and subsequent neighborhood deprivation: Revisiting the social drift hypothesis using population, twin and molecular genetic data. Translational Psychiatry6(5): e796.
21.
SiddleD.ABondN.W. (1988) Avoidance learning, Pavlovian conditioning, and the development of phobias. Biological Psychology27(2): 167–183.
22.
SligoF.X.TilleyE. (2011) When words fail us: Using visual composites in research reporting. Visual Communication10(1): 63–85.
23.
Stanger-HallK.F. (2012) Multiple-choice exams: An obstacle for higher-level thinking in introductory science classes. CBE-Life Sciences Education11(3): 294–306.
24.
WolpeJ. (1968). Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Conditional Reflex: A Pavlovian Journal of Research & Therapy3(4): 234–240.
