This article responds to Pauwels’ assertion that visual research is no longer the (nearly) exclusive domain of camera-based visual materials and methods. The authors argue that, in certain contexts, objects can provide appropriate and valid visual research materials in their own right. The article begins by examining the institutionalized parameters for visual research established by this journal (Visual Communication), Visual Studies and the International Visual Sociology Association. Next, a careful review of the contemporary literature reveals that objects are already recognized as legitimate visual research materials, albeit discreetly. After describing an exploratory research process that integrated participatory mapping and 3D model-building activities, the authors discuss the potential of purpose-made objects as a distinctive type of visual material. The article concludes by encouraging the acceptance of visual research that looks beyond images.
BessetteG. (2004) Involving the Community: A Guide to Participatory Development Communication. Penang, Malaysia, and Ottawa, Canada: Southbound and the International Development Research Centre.
5.
BuckinghamD. (2009) ‘Creative’ visual methods in media research: Possibilities, problems and proposals. Media, Culture & Society31: 633–652.
6.
BürgiP.T.JacobsC.D.RoosJ. (2005) From metaphor to practice. Journal of Management Inquiry14(1): 78–94.
7.
ClarkA. (2011) Multimodal map making with young children: Exploring ethnographic and participatory methods. Qualitative Research11(3): 311–330.
8.
CollierJ.CollierM. (1986) Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
9.
EdwardsE. (2002) Material beings: Objecthood and ethnographic photographs. Visual Studies17(1): 67–75.
EmmisonM.SmithP. (2000) Researching the Visual: Images, Objects, Contexts and Interactions in Social and Cultural Enquiry. London: Sage.
12.
EmmisonM.SmithP.MayallM. (2012) Researching the Visual, 2nd edn.London: Sage.
13.
GaillardJ.C.PangilinanM.L.C.J.D. (2010) Participatory mapping for raising disaster risk awareness among the youth. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management18(3): 175–179.
14.
GantL.M.. (2009) Effects of photovoice: Civic engagement among older youth in urban communities. Journal of Community Practice17: 358–376.
15.
GauntlettD. (2007) Creative Explorations: New Approaches to Identities and Audiences. Abingdon: Routledge.
16.
GauntlettD. (2010) Creativity, participation and connectedness: An interview with David Gauntlett. In: Sonvilla-WeissS. (ed.) Mashup Cultures. Heidelberg: Springer, 65–78.
17.
GauntlettDHolzwarthP. (2006) Creative and visual methods for exploring identities. Visual Studies21(1): 82–91.
18.
GoldS.J. (2007) Using photography in studies of immigrant communities: Reflecting across projects and populations. In: StanczaG.C. (ed.) Visual Research Methods: Image, Society, and Representation, London: Sage, 141–166.
19.
HarperD. (2002) Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies17(1): 13–26.
20.
HinthorneL.L. (2012) A picture is worth a thousand words: Using the visual interpretation narrative exercise to elicit non-elite perceptions of democracy. Field Methods24(3): 348–364.
21.
HinthorneL.L. (2014) Using digital and instant film photography for research documentation: A research note. Qualitative Research14(4): 508–519.
22.
HinthorneL.LSchneiderK. (2012) Playing with purpose: Using serious play to enhance participatory development communication in research. International Journal of Communication6: 2801–2824.
23.
HollidayG.StatlerMFlandersM. (2007) Developing practically wise leaders through serious play. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research59(2): 126–134.
24.
HurdleyR. (2007) Focal points: Framing material culture and visual data. Qualitative Research7(3): 355–374.
KaliboH.MedleyK. (2007) Participatory resource mapping for adaptive collaborative management at Mt. Kasigau, Kenya. Landscape and Urban Planning82: 145–158.
27.
KnowlesCSweetmanP. (2004) Picturing the Social Landscape: Visual Methods and the Sociological Imagination. London: Routledge.
LiebenbergL. (2009) The visual image as discussion point: Increasing validity in boundary crossing research. Qualitative Research9(4): 441–467.
30.
MacedaE.A.. (2009) Experimental use of participatory 3-dimensional models in island community-based disaster risk management. Shima: The International Journal of Research into Island Cultures3(1): 72–84.
31.
MamanS. (2009) Using participatory mapping to inform a community-randomized trial of HIV counseling and testing. Field Methods21(4): 368–387.
32.
MargolisE.PauwelsL. (2011) The Sage Handbook of Visual Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
MillerD. (2008) The Comfort of Things. Cambridge: Polity Press.
MutonyiH.KendrickM. (2011) Cartoon drawing as a means of accessing what students know about HIV/AIDS: An alternative method. Visual Communication10(2): 231–249.
36.
PahlKRowsellJ. (2010) Artifactual Literacies: Every Object Tells a Story. New York: Teachers College Press.
37.
PainH. (2012) A literature review to evaluate the choice and use of visual methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods11(4): 303–319.
38.
PauwelsL. (2010) Visual sociology reframed: An analytical synthesis and discussion of visual methods in social and cultural research. Sociological Methods and Research38(4): 545–581.
39.
PauwelsL. (2012) Contemplating the state of visual research: An assessment of obstacles and opportunities. In: PinkS (ed.) Advances in Visual Methodology. London: Sage, 248–264.
ProsserJ. (1998) The status of image-based research. In: ProsserJ. (ed.) Image-Based Research: A Sourcebook for Qualitative Researchers. London: Falmer Press, 97–112.
45.
QuarryW.RamírezR. (2009). Communication for Another Development. London: Zed Books.
46.
RambaldiG.Callosa-TarrJ. (2002) Participatory 3-Dimensional Modelling: Guiding Principles and Applications. Los Baños, Philippines: ASEAN Regional Centre for Biodiversity Conservation.
47.
RileyA. (2008) On the role of images in the construction of narratives about the crash of United Airlines Flight 93. Visual Studies23(1): 4–19.
48.
RoosJ.VictorB.StatlerM. (2004) Playing seriously with strategy. Long Range Planning37: 549–568.
49.
RoseG. (2007) Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Methods, 2nd edn.London: Sage.
50.
RowsellJ. (2011) Carrying my family with me: Artefacts as emic perspectives. Qualitative Research11(3): 331–246.
51.
SligoF.X.TilleyE. (2011) When words fail us: Using visual composites in research reporting. Visual Communication10(1): 63–85.
52.
TufteT.MefalopulosP. (2009) Participatory communication: A practical guide. World Bank Working Paper No. 170. Washington, DC: World Bank.
53.
TurkleS. (2007) Evocative Objects. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
54.
VaughnLRojas-GuylerL. (2008) ‘Picturing’ health: A photovoice pilot of Latina girls’ perceptions of health. Family & Community Health31(4): 305–316.
WagnerJ. (2006) The visible substance of social research. In: HamiltonP. (ed.) Visual Research Methods, Vol. 3. London: Sage, 401–424.
58.
WangC.BurrisM.A. (1997) Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education Behaviour24(3): 369–387.
59.
Woodley-BakerR. (2011) Private and public experience captured: Young women capture their everyday lives and dreams through photo-narratives. Visual Studies24(1): 19–35.
60.
YatesL. (2011) The story they want to tell, and the visual story as evidence: Young people, research authority and research purposes in the education and health domains. Visual Studies25(3): 280–291.
