Visual metaphors have been the focus of experimental and corpus studies aiming to determine whether metaphors are conceptual or purely linguistic. However, in visual metaphor research, experimental and corpus approaches have each been directed at a distinct set of visual metaphors. Psychological experiments have focused on primary metaphors, whereas corpus studies have concentrated on non-primary metaphors. The current study suggests that when non-primary metaphors are examined experimentally, cognitive effects appear only when the metaphor is contextually relevant. intelligence is brightness, for example, is not relevant when the potential source of intelligence is inaccessible. In this study, images of open books with bright backgrounds are rated as more likely to represent works of genius than open books with darker backgrounds. When books are closed, their ‘genius’ is inaccessible and intelligence is brightness has no effect.
BoroditskyL. (2000) Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition75(1): 1–28.
2.
BounegruLForcevilleC. (2011) Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication10(2): 209–229.
3.
CaivanoJ.L. (1998) Color and semiotics: A two-way street. COLOR Research & Application23(6): 390–401.
4.
CasasantoD. (2008) Similarity and proximity: When does close in space mean close in mind?Memory & Cognition36(6): 1047–1056.
5.
CasasantoD.LozanoS. (2008) The cognitive function of metaphorical gestures. In: CienkiAMüllerC. (eds) Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6.
CasasantoD.. (2005) How deep are the effects of language on thought? Time estimation in speakers of English, Indonesian, Greek, and Spanish. In: ForbusK. (eds) Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 575–580.
7.
DéribéréM. (1964) La Couleur dans les activités humaines (El Color en las actividades humanas). Madrid: Tecnos.
8.
El RefaieE. (2003) Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication2(1): 75–95.
9.
ForcevilleC. (1994) Pictorial metaphor in advertisements. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity9(1): 1–29.
10.
FrankM.G.GilovichT. (1988) The dark side of self- and social perception: Black uniforms and aggression in professional sports. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology54(1): 74–85.
11.
GibbsR.WJrO’BrienJ. (1990) Idioms and mental imagery: The metaphorical motivation for idiomatic meaning. Cognition36: 35–68.
12.
GibbsR.WJr. (1997) Metaphor in idiom comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language37: 141–154.
13.
GradyJ.E. (1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
14.
GradyJJohnsonC. (1998) Converging evidence for the notions of subscene and primary scene. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA, 123–136.
15.
LakensDSeminG.R.ForoniF. (2012) But for the bad, there would not be good: Grounding valence in brightness through shared relational structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General141(3): 584–594.
16.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1999) Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
17.
LakoffG.NúñezR.E. (2000) Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.
18.
LakoffGTurnerM. (1989) More Than Cool Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
MeierB.P.RobinsonM.D. (2004) Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science15(2): 243–247.
20.
MeierB.P.RobinsonM.CloreG. (2004) Why good guys wear white: Automatic inferences about stimulus valence based on brightness. Psychological Science15(2): 82–87.
21.
NickelsE. (2007) Good guys wear black: Uniform color and citizen impressions of police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management31(1): 77–92.
22.
PeñaJ.HancockJ.T.MerolaN.A. (2009) The priming effects of avatars in virtual settings. Communication Research36(6): 838–856.
23.
PopeA. (1949) The Language of Drawing and Painting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
SchubertT.W. (2005) Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89(1): 1–21.
25.
SchubertT.WWaldzusS.GiessnerS.R. (2009) Control over the association of power and size. Social Cognition27(1): 1–19.
26.
SullivanK. (2006) Frame-based constraints on lexical choice in metaphor. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA.
27.
SullivanK. (2013a) Frames and Constructions in Metaphoric Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
28.
SullivanK. (2013b) A tangled knot of target domains: Assessing intelligence is brightness and goodness is brightness in an image rating task. Metaphorik.de23: 7–18.
29.
ValenzuelaJSorianoC (2007) Reading anger stories: A lexical decision task as a test for the existence of metaphorical representation. In: Language, Mind and the Lexicon. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 281–303.
30.
ValenzuelaJ.SorianoC. (2008) Is ‘friendship’ more important than ‘money’: A psycholinguistic exploration of the important is big metaphor. VI AELCO Conference, Castellón, Spain.
31.
ValenzuelaJSorianoC. (2009) Is Control really up? A psycholinguistic exploration of a primary metaphor. In: ValenzuelaJ. (eds) Trends in Cognitive Linguistics: Theoretical and Applied Models. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 31–50.
32.
WaughL.R.. (2007) Multiple empirical approaches to a complex analysis of discourse. In: Gonzalez-MarquezM. (eds) Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
33.
WilliamsJ.EMorlandJ.K. (1976) Race, Color, and the Young Child. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
34.
ZhongC.B.LeonardelliG.J. (2008) Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold?Psychological Science19(9): 838–842.
35.
ZhongC.BLiljenquistK. (2006) Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science313: 1451–1452.
