In this study, the author draws upon a social semiotic framework, exploring the ways in which students can use visual semiotic resources while composing texts in literacy classroom contexts. His multi-case study involving three cases of students in primary-level classrooms focuses specifically on how several focal students created, accessed, and assembled sets of visual semiotic resources that they used while engaged in the literacy processes at hand. This study defines and develops the concept of a visual composing resource, and qualifies the range, scope, and type of visual resources that were available to the students while they engaged in literacy processes in various classroom settings. The author also illustrates how the students brought these sets of visual composing resources into a complex interaction with the semiotic assemblages that they were producing in each context, revealing important aspects of early literacy processes that incorporate visuality.
BurnA.ParkerD. (2003) Tiger’s big plan: Multimodality and the moving image. In: JewittC.KressG. (eds) Multimodal Literacy. New York: Peter Lang, 56–72.
4.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research, 3rd edn. London: Sage.
5.
DysonA.H. (1997) Writing Superheroes: Contemporary Childhood, Popular Culture, and Classroom Literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.
6.
DysonA.H. (2003) The Brothers and Sisters Learn to Write: Popular Literacies in Childhood and School Cultures. New York: Teachers College Press.
7.
DysonA.H.GenishiC. (2005) On the Case: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research. New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
FirestoneW.A.HerriottR. (1984) Multisite qualitative policy research: Some design and implementation issues. In: FettermanD.M., (ed.) Ethnography in Educational Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 63–88.
9.
GenishiC.StiresS.Yung-ChanD. (2001) Writing in an integrated curriculum: Prekindergarten English language learners as symbol makers. The Elementary School Journal101(4): 399–416.
10.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. London: AldineTransaction.
11.
GlesneC. (1999) Becoming Qualitative Researchers. New York: Longman.
12.
HallidayM.A.K. (1978) Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. New York: Edward Arnold.
13.
HarsteJ.. (1984) Language Stories and Literacy Lessons. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
14.
HeathS.B.WolfS. (2005) Focus on creative learning: Drawing on art for language development. Literacy39(1): 38–45.
15.
HopperstadM. (2008) How children make meaning through drawing and play. Visual Communication7(1): 77–96.
16.
HullG.NelsonM. (2005) Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication22(2): 224–261.
17.
JewittC.OyamaR. (2001) Visual meaning: A social semiotic approach. In: Van LeeuwenT.JewittC., (eds) Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: Sage, 134–156.
18.
KennerC.KressG. (2003) The multisemiotic resources of biliterate children. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy3(2): 179–202.
19.
KressG. (2003) Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.
20.
KressG. (2001) Text as the punctuation of semiosis: Pulling at some of the threads. In: MeinhofU.SmithJ., (eds) Intertextuality and the Media: From Genre to Everyday Life. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
21.
KressG. (2010) Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.
22.
LabboL. (1996) A semiotic analysis of children’s symbol making in a classroom computer center. Reading Research Quarterly31(4): 356–385.
23.
ListerM.. (2003) New Media: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.
24.
MahiriJ. (2006) Digital DJ-ing: Rhythms of learning in an urban school. Language Arts84(1): 55–63.
25.
Marvel Comics (2005) ‘The Abomination!’, Marvel Age Hulk 4. New York: Marvel Entertainment.
26.
MaversD. (2007) Semiotic resourcefulness: A young child’s email exchange as design. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy7(2): 155–176.
27.
MaversD. (2009) Student text-making as semiotic work. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy9(2): 141–155.
MerriamS. (1998) Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30.
MurrayD. (1980) Writing as process: How writing finds its own meaning, In DonovanT.McClellandB. (eds) Eight Approaches to Teaching Composition. Urbana, IL: NCTE. 3–20.
31.
New London Group (2000) A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In: CopeB.KalantzisM. (eds) Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. New York: Routledge, 9–37.
32.
PahlK. (2003) Children’s text-making at home: Transforming meaning across modes, In: JewittC.KressG. (eds) Multimodal Literacy. New York: Peter Lang, 139–154.
33.
PahlK. (2009) Interactions, intersections and improvisations: Studying the multimodal texts and classroom talk of six- to seven-year-olds. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy9(2): 188–210.
34.
RankerJ. (2007) Designing meaning with multiple media sources: A case study of an eight-year-old student’s writing processes. Research in the Teaching of English41(4): 402–434.
35.
RankerJ. (2008) Composing across multiple media: A case study of digital video production in a fifth grade classroom. Written Communication25(2): 196–234.
36.
RankerJ. (2009) Redesigning and transforming: The role of semiotic import in young students’ uses of composing resources while learning to write in English as an additional language. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy9(3): 319–347.
37.
SiegelM. (1995) More than words: The generative power of transmediation for learning. Canadian Journal of Education20(4): 455–475.
38.
SiegelM. (2006) Rereading the signs: Multimodal transformations in the field of literacy education. Language Arts84(1): 65–77.
39.
SmagorinskyP. (ed.) (2006) Research on Composition: Multiple Perspectives on Two Decades of Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
40.
SquireJ. (1983) Composing and comprehending: Two sides of the same basic process. Language Arts60(5): 581–589.
41.
StakeR. (2006) Multiple Case Study Analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
42.
Van LeeuwenT. (2000) It was just like magic: A multimodal analysis of children’s writing. Linguistics and Education10(3): 273–305.
43.
Van LeeuwenT. (2004) Introducing Social Semiotics. New York: Routledge.
44.
WalshC. (2007) Creativity as capital in the literacy classroom: Youth as multimodal designers. Literacy41(2): 79–85.
45.
YinR. (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 6th edn. Los Angeles: Sage.
