In this article, the authors propose a systematic method for analysing film that bridges the gap between analyses of narrative concerns, on the one hand, and the analysis of fine-grained technical details, on the other. They illustrate the approach on the basis of an analysis of Memento, a film particularly noted for its unusual narrative structure and show how their method maintains a tighter linkage with the filmic material presented while at the same time drawing out narratively significant generalizations.
BraniganE. (1984) Point of View in the Cinema: A Theory of Narration and Subjectivity in Classical Film (Approaches to Semiotics 66). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
10.
BucklandW. (2009) ‘Introduction: Puzzle Plots’, in BucklandW. (ed.) Puzzle Films: Complex Storytelling in Contemporary Cinema’, pp. 1–12. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
11.
CarrollN. (2009) ‘Memento and the Phenomenology of Comprehending Motion Picture Narration’, in KaniaA. (ed.) ‘Memento’, Philosophers on Film, pp. 127–46. London: Routledge.
12.
de SaussureF. (1959[1915]) Course in General Linguistics, ed. CharlesBallyAlbertSechehaye, in collaboration with Albert Riedlinger; trans. WadeBaskin.New York: McGraw-Hill and the Philosophical Library.
13.
GhislottiS. (2009) ‘Narrative Comprehension Made Difficult: Film Form and Mnemonic Devices in Memento’, in BucklandW. (ed.) Puzzle Films: Complex Storytelling in Contemporary Cinema’, pp. 87–106. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
14.
HallidayM.A.K.HasanR. (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
15.
HallidayM.A.K.MatthiessenC.M.I.M. (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn.London: Edward Arnold.
16.
HasanR. (1984) ‘Coherence and Cohesive Harmony’, in FloodJ. (ed.) Understanding Reading Comprehension: Cognition, Language, and the Structure of Prose, pp. 181–219. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
17.
HeathS. (1975) ‘Film and System: Terms of Analysis, Part I’, Screen16(1): 7–77.
18.
HjelmslevL. (1961[1943]) Prolegomena to a Theory of Language, trans. WhitfieldF.J.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
19.
JanneyR.W. (2010) ‘Film Discourse Cohesion’, in HoffmannC.R. (ed.) Narrative Revisited: Telling a Story in the Age of New Media (Pragmatics and Beyond Series 1999), pp. 245–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20.
KaniaA. (ed.) (2009) Memento, Philosophers on Film. London: Routledge.
KochC.H. (1970) ‘Understanding Film as Process of Change: A Metalanguage for the Study of Film Developed and Applied to Ingmar Bergman’s Persona and Alan J. Pakula’s The Sterile Cuckoo’, PhD thesis, University of Iowa, UMI Microform, Ann Arbor, MI.
23.
KressG.van LeeuwenT. (1996) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
24.
KressG.van LeeuwenT. (2001) Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
MartinJ.R. (1992) English Text: Systems and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
27.
MetzC. (1974a) Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema, trans. TaylorMichael. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
MetzC. (1974b) Language and Cinema (Approaches to Semiotics 26), trans. Umiker-SebeokDonna Jean. The Hague: Mouton
29.
PalmerR. (1989) ‘Bakhtinian Translinguistics and Film Criticism: The Dialogical Image?’, in PalmerR. (ed.) The Cinematic Text: Methods and Approaches’, pp. 303–41. New York: AMS Press.
30.
RothL. (1983) Film Semiotics, Metz, and Leone’s Trilogy. New York: Garland Publishing.
31.
RungeI. (2008) Zeit im Rückwärtsschritt. Über das Stilmittel der chronologischen Inversion in Memento, Irréversible und 5 x 2. Stuttgart: Ibidem.
32.
SharffS. (1982) The Elements of Cinema: Towards a Theory of Cinesthetic Impact. New York: Columbia University Press.
33.
SibielskiR. (2004) ‘Postmodern Narrative or Narrative of the Postmodern? History, Identity, and the Failure of Rationality as an Ordering Principle in Memento’, Literature & Psychology49(4): 82–100.
34.
TsengC. (2008) ‘Cohesive Harmony in Filmic Text’, in UnsworthL. (ed.) Multimodal Semiotics: Functional Analysis in Contexts of Education, pp. 87–104. London: Continuum.
35.
TsengC. (2009) ‘Cohesion in Film, and the Construction of Filmic Thematic Configurations: A Functional Perspective’, PhD thesis, Faculty of Linguistics and Literary Sciences, University of Bremen.
36.
TsengC.BatemanJ.A. (2010) ‘Chain and Choice in Filmic Narrative: An Analysis of Multimodal Narrative Construction in The Fountain’, in HoffmannC.R. (ed.) Narrative Revisited: Telling a Story in the Age of New Media’ (Pragmatics and Beyond 199), pp. 213–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
37.
van LeeuwenT. (1985) ‘Rhythmic Structure of the Film Text’, in van DijkT.A. (ed.) Discourse and Communication: New Approaches to the Analysis of Mass Media Discourse and Communication’, pp. 216–32. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
38.
van LeeuwenT. (1991) ‘Conjunctive Structure in Documentary Film and Television’, Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies5(1): 76–114.
39.
van LeeuwenT. (2005) Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
