Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Clipart is the visual representation of commonsense categories and stereotypes of social representations, as defined by Moscovici. Indexed and displayed online for downloading on Microsoft's Design Gallery and Art Today's clipart.com, the clips exhibit strong threads of continuity with earlier popular illustration and rhetorical manuals of gesture. At the same time, they also register differences in the social representations of different eras, as well as divisions and complexities in the representation of controversial categories such as sexual harassment. Though it is questionable how and in what way the theories popular at a particular time can be critiqued by citing the clipart of the era, these large archives provide powerful new tools for seeing, displaying, and investigating social representations - more powerful and useful than directly accessing Google's hundreds of millions of online `images'.

Keywords

clich gesture rhetoric social representations stereotypes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armstrong, N. and Wagner, M. (2003) Field Guide to Gestures. Philadelphia: Quirk Books .

Austin, G. (1966[1806]) Chironomia, Or, A Treatise on Rhetorical Delivery, ed. M. Robb and L. Thomssen . Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press .

Billig, M. (1987) Arguing and Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

Bulwer, J. (1974[1644]) Chirologia: Or the Natural Language of the Hand and Chironomia: Or the Art of Manual Rhetoric, ed. J. Cleary . Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press .

Duveen, G. (2001) ‘The Power of Ideas’, Introduction to Serge Moscovici, Social Representations. New York: New York University Press .

Habermas, J. (1991[1962]) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

Heller, S. (2002) The Graphic Design Reader. New York: Allworth Press .

Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (1996) Reading Images. London: Routledge .

Lanham, R. (1993) The Electronic Word. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .

10.

Long, E. (1992) ‘Textual Interpretation as Collective Action’, in J. Boyarin (ed.) The Ethnography of Reading, pp. 180-211. Berkeley: University of California Press .

11.

Lupton, E. (1989) ‘Reading ISOTYPE’, in V. Margolin (ed.) Design Discourse, pp. 145-155. Chicago: Chicago University Press .

12.

Moscovici, S. (1988) ‘Notes Towards a Description of Social Representations’ , European Journal of Social Psychology 18: 211-250 .

13.

Moscovici, S. (2001) Social Representations. New York: New York University Press .

14.

Rosch, E. (1977) ‘Human Categorization’, in N. Warren (ed.) Studies in Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 3-49. London: Academic Press .

15.

Runquist, P. R. (ed.) (2002) Pictographs of People. New York: Dover Publications .

16.

Schank, R. and Abelson, R. (1977) Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .

17.

Sless, D. (1986) In Search of Semiotics. London: Croom Helm .

18.

Taylor, C. (2000) posting to InfoDesign café, April, 2000.

19.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1998) Ideology. London: Sage .

20.

Wysocki, A. and Johnson-Eilola, J. (1999) ‘Blinded by the Letter: Why Are We Using Literacy as a Metaphor for Everything Else?’, in G. Hawisher and C. Selfe (eds) Passions, Pedagogies, and 21st Century Technologies, pp. 349-368. Logan: Utah State University Press .

Clipart images as commonsense categories

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References