Narrativization of human population genetics: Two cases in Iceland and Russia

Abstract

Using the two cases of the Icelandic Health Sector Database and Russian initiatives in biobanking, the article criticizes the view of narratives and imaginaries as a sufficient and unproblematic means of shaping public understanding of genetics and justifying population-wide projects. Narrative representations of national biobanking engage particular imaginaries that are not bound by the universal normative framework of human rights, promote affective thinking, distract the public from recognizing and discussing tangible ethical and socioeconomic issues, and harm trust in science and technology. In the Icelandic case, the presentation of the project in association with national imaginaries concealed its market identity and could lead to the commodification of biodata. In the Russian case, framing in terms of “genetic sovereignty” and “civilizational code” offers pretexts for state securitization. Adherence to normative framework of human rights and public discussion of genetics in an argumentative and factual mode can counter these trends.

Keywords

attitudes on genetics biotechnology and culture commodification ethics imaginaries media representations narratives rhetoric of science and technology securitization social representations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

(2013) “Culling the herd”: Eugenics and the conservation movement in the United States, 1900–1940. Journal of the History of Biology 46(1): 31–72.

Andersen

Arnason

Sigurðsson

(1999) Kafkaesque ethics for post-modern Vikings? BMJ : British Medical Journal 319(7220): 441.

Appadurai

(ed.) (1988) The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Arnason

Simpson

(2003) Refractions through culture: The new genomics in Iceland. Ethnos 68(4): 533–553.

Árnason

(2011) Database research: Public and private interests. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20(4): 563–571.

Árnason

(2017) Biological or democratic citizenship. In: Kakuk

(ed.) Bioethics and Biopolitics: Theories, Applications and Connections (Advancing Global Bioethics). Cham: Springer, pp. 31–45.

Balzacq

(2010) Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. Abingdon: Routledge.

Barker

(2021) Global genetic fictions. Medical Humanities 47(2): 129–134.

Benjamin

(2009) A lab of their own: Genomic sovereignty as postcolonial science policy. Policy and Society 28(4): 341–355.

10.

BMJ (1999) Ethics and narrative. BMJ 318(7175): 318.

11.

Boukes

LaMarre

(2021) Narrative persuasion by corporate CSR messages: The impact of narrative richness on attitudes and behavioral intentions via character identification, transportation, and message credibility. Public Relations Review 47(5): 102107.

12.

Bruner

(1986) Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

13.

Bryzgalina

Alasania

Varkhotov

Gavrilenko

Shkomova

(2017) The social dimension of biobanking: Objectives and challenges. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13: 15.

14.

Bubela

Caulfield

(2005) Media representations of genetic research. In: Einsiedel

Timmermans

(eds) Crossing Over: Genomics in the Public Arena. Calgary, AB, Canada: University of Calgary Press, pp. 117–130.

15.

Busby

Martin

(2006) Biobanks, national identity and imagined communities: The case of UK biobank. Science as Culture 15(3): 237–251.

16.

Byock

(2013) The Icelandic Althing: Dawn of Parliamentary Democracy. In: Fladmark

(ed.) Heritage and Identity: Shaping the Nations of the North, 1st edn. Shaftesbury: Routledge, pp. 1–18.

17.

Chadwick

(1999) The Icelandic database—do modern times need modern sagas? BMJ : British Medical Journal 319(7207): 441–444.

18.

Chadwick

Berg

(2001) Solidarity and equity: New ethical frameworks for genetic databases. Nature Reviews Genetics 2(4): 318–321.

19.

Choksey

(2021) Narrative in the Age of the Genome: Genetic Worlds. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

20.

Clark

Green

Simons

JJP

(2019) Narrative warmth and quantitative competence: Message type affects impressions of a speaker. PLoS ONE 14(12): e0226713.

21.

Dahlstrom

(2012) The persuasive influence of narrative causality: Psychological mechanism, strength in overcoming resistance, and persistence over time. Media Psychology 15(3): 303–326.

22.

Dahlstrom

(2014) Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(Suppl. 4): 13614–13620.

23.

Dahlstrom

(2021) The narrative truth about scientific misinformation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(15): e1914085117.

24.

Dahlstrom

(2012) Ethical considerations of using narrative to communicate science. Science Communication 34(5): 592–617.

25.

Davies

Halpern

Horst

Kirby

Lewenstein

(2019) Science stories as culture: Experience, identity, narrative and emotion in public communication of science. Journal of Science Communication 18(5): A01.

26.

deCODE Genetics (2000a) deCODE prospectus. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Available at: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1022974/000095012300006624/0000950123-00-006624-index.htm (accessed 27 January 2021).

27.

deCODE Genetics (2000b) deCODEs genetics homepage. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20001109150900/http://www.decode.com/company/ (accessed 27 January 2021).

28.

Dibben

(2009) Nature and nation: National identity and environmentalism in Icelandic popular music video and music documentary. Ethnomusicology Forum 18(1): 131–151.

29.

Dillon

Lobo-Guerrero

(2008) Biopolitics of security in the 21st century: An introduction. Review of International Studies 34(2): 265–292.

30.

Dillon

Craig

(2021) Storylistening: Narrative Evidence and Public Reasoning. Abingdon: Routledge.

31.

Einsiedel

(2005) Telling technological tales: The media and the evolution of biotechnology. In: Einsiedel

Timmermans

(eds) Crossing Over: Genomics in the Public Arena. Calgary, AB, Canada: University of Calgary Press, pp. 143–156.

32.

Enserink

(1998) Opponents criticize Iceland’s database. Science 282(5390): 859–859.

33.

Fortun

(2001) Mediated speculations in the genomics futures markets. New Genetics and Society 20(2): 139–156.

34.

Fortun

(2008) Promising Genomics: Iceland and deCODE Genetics in a World of Speculation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

35.

Friðriksson

(2009) Language Change vs. Stability in Conservative Language Communities: A Case Study of Icelandic. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.

36.

Gill

(2020) Biofictions: Race, Genetics and the Contemporary Novel. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

37.

Greely

(2000) Iceland’s plan for genomics research: Facts and implications. Jurimetrics 40(2): 153–191.

38.

Gremaud

A-S

(2010) The Vikings are coming! A modern Icelandic self-image in the light of the economic crisis. NORDEUROPAforum 20(1): 87–106.

39.

Gulcher

Stefánsson

(2000) The Icelandic healthcare database and informed consent. The New England Journal of Medicine 342(24): 1827–1830.

40.

Hafstein

(2000) The Elves’ point of view cultural identity in contemporary Icelandic Elf-tradition. Journal of Folktale Studies 41(1–2): 87–104.

41.

Halink

(2014) The Icelandic mythscape: Sagas, landscapes and national identity. National Identities 16(3): 209–223.

42.

Hall

(2020) Útrásarvíkingar: The Literature of the Icelandic Financial Crisis. Santa Barbara, CA: Punctum Books.

43.

Hannesdóttir

(1993) Books and reading in Iceland in a historical perspective. Libraries & Culture 28(1): 13–21.

44.

Hanson

(2020) Genetics and the Literary Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

45.

Hilmarsson-Dunn

Kristinsson

(2010) The language situation in Iceland. Current Issues in Language Planning 11(3): 207–276.

46.

Hilmarsson-Dunn

(2006) Protectionist language policies in the face of the forces of English. The case of Iceland. Language Policy 5(3): 295–314.

47.

Hjörleifsson

Árnason

Schei

(2008) Decoding the genetics debate: Hype and hope in Icelandic news media in 2000 and 2004. New Genetics and Society 27(4): 377–394.

48.

Hoeyer

(2007) Person, patent and property: A critique of the commodification hypothesis. BioSocieties 2(3): 327–348.

49.

Howell

(2014) The global politics of medicine: Beyond global health, against securitisation theory. Review of International Studies 40(5): 961–987.

50.

Interfax (2022) Pentagon admits working with biolabs in Ukraine. Interfax.ru, 9 June. Available at: https://www.interfax.ru/world/845652 (accessed 7 September 2022).

51.

Jenkins

(2010) Commodity/ commodification and cultural studies. In: Ryan

(ed.) The Encyclopedia of Literary and Cultural Theory. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, pp. 965–68. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781444337839.wbelctv3c007 (accessed 25 January 2021).

52.

Jóhannesson

(2015) Exploiting Icelandic history: 2000–2008. In: Durrenberger

Palsson

(eds) Gambling Debt (Iceland’s Rise and Fall in the Global Economy). Denver, CO: University Press of Colorado, pp. 15–22. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt169wdcd.7 (accessed 14 March 2021).

53.

Kjartansdóttir

(2011) The new Viking wave. Cultural heritage and capitalism. In: Isleifsson

Chartier

(eds) Iceland and Images of the North. Québec City, QC, Canada: Presses de l’Université du Québec, pp. 461–480. Available at: https://archipel.uqam.ca/10476/ (accessed 14 March 2021).

54.

Kovalchuk

Naraikin

Yatsishina

(2019) Nature-like technologies: New opportunities and new challenges. Вестник Российской академии наук 89(5): 455–465.

55.

Lazić

Žeželj

(2021) A systematic review of narrative interventions: Lessons for countering anti-vaccination conspiracy theories and misinformation. Public Understanding of Science 30(6): 644–670.

56.

Lewontin

(1999) Opinion—People are not commodities. The New York Times, 23 January. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/1999/01/23/opinion/people-are-not-commodities.html (accessed 16 November 2019).

57.

Loftsdóttir

Jensen

(2016) Belonging and the Icelandic others: Situating Icelandic identity in a postcolonial context. In: Loftsdóttir

(ed.) Whiteness and Postcolonialism in the Nordic Region: Exceptionalism, Migrant Others and National Identities. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 57–71.

58.

Mau

Drobyshevskaya

(2012) Modernization and the Russian economy: Three hundred years of catching up. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2135459, 1 June. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2135459 (accessed 19 July 2020).

59.

McInnis

(1999) The assent of a nation: Genethics and Iceland. Clinical Genetics 55(4): 234–239.

60.

Mehta

Aaron

(2017) How a Pentagon research project convinced Vladimir Putin of a coming biowar. Available at: https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2017/11/02/how-a-pentagon-research-project-convinced-vladimir-putin-of-a-coming-biowar/ (accessed 27 June 2020).

61.

Meyer

(2004) Comparative law. Genetic privacy. Icelandic Supreme Court holds that inclusion of an individual’s genetic information in a national database infringes on the privacy interests of his child. Guðmundsdóttir v. Iceland, no. 151/2003 (Nov. 27, 2003) (Ice.). Harvard Law Review 118(2): 810–817.

62.

Morgunblaðið Pálmadóttir

(1996) Read the genetic material. Available at: https://www.mbl.is/frettir/innlent/1996/11/24/lesid_i_erfdaefnid/ (accessed 13 March 2021).

63.

NASBIO (2021a) NASBIO—About association. Available at: http://nasbio.ru/en/about-us/about-association.html (accessed 3 August 2020).

64.

NASBIO (2021b) NASBIO—Members. Available at: http://nasbio.ru/en/membership/members (accessed 3 August 2020).

65.

NRCKI (2021) NRCKI—History. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20220303023943/http://eng.nrcki.ru/pages/eng/history/index.shtml (accessed 4 October 2023).

66.

Oslund

(2002) Imagining Iceland: Narratives of nature and history in the North Atlantic. The British Journal for the History of Science 35(3): 313–334.

67.

Oslund

(2011) Iceland Imagined: Nature, Culture, and Storytelling in the North Atlantic. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.

68.

Pálsson

(1995) The Textual Life of Savants: Ethnography, Iceland, and the Linguistic Turn, 1st edn. Abingdon: Routledge.

69.

Pálsson

(2007) Anthropology and the New Genetics, Illustrated edn. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

70.

Pálsson

Harðardottir

(2002) For whom the cell tolls: Debates about biomedicine. Current Anthropology 43(2): 271–301.

71.

Petty

Cacioppo

(1986) Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York, NY: Springer.

72.

Pipes

(1974) Russia Under the Old Regime. New York, NY: Scribner.

73.

Rose

(2001) The Commodification of Bioinformation : The Icelandic Health Sector Database. London: The Wellcome Trust. Available at: https://wellcomecollection.org/works/kxenq2ue (accessed 22 June 2020).

74.

Rosneft (2021) Rosneft at a glance. Available at: https://www.rosneft.com/about/Rosneft_today/ (accessed 23 February 2020).

75.

Scott

(1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

76.

Sigurðsson

(2000) The dome of the world: Iceland, Doomsday technologies, and the cold war. In: Sigurðsson

Skaptason

(eds) Aspects of Arctic and Sub-Arctic History. Reykjavík: University of Iceland Press, pp. 475–485.

77.

Sigurðsson

(2001) Yin-Yang genetics, or the HSD deCODE controversy. New Genetics and Society 20(2): 103–117.

78.

Simpson

(2000) Imagined genetic communities: Ethnicity and essentialism in the twenty-first century. Anthropology Today 16(3): 3–6.

79.

Sleeboom-Faulkner

(2006) How to define a population: Cultural politics and population genetics in the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of China. BioSocieties 1(4): 399–419.

80.

Stefánsson

(2000) The Icelandic healthcare database: A tool to create knowledge, a social debate, and a bioethical privacy challenge. In: Nielsen L and Holm C (eds) “Who Owns Our Genes?” Proceedings of an International Conference, October 1999, Tallinn, Estonia. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, pp. 23–32.

81.

Tarkkala

(2019) Reorganizing Biomedical Research: Biobanks as Conditions of Possibility for Personalized Medicine. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto. Available at: https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/300602 (accessed 18 August 2021).

82.

TASS (2022) Putin: US biolabs in Ukraine were essentially developing biological weapons. Available at: https://tass.ru/politika/14636173?utm_source=google.com&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=google.com&utm_referrer=google.com (accessed 7 September 2022).

83.

Taylor

(2003) Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham; London: Duke University Press.

84.

Troianovski

(2021) “We know how to defend our interests”: Putin’s emerging hard line. The New York Times, 20 April. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/20/world/europe/putin-biden-ukraine-navalny.html (accessed 16 August 2021).

85.

Tsai

Y-Y

Lee

W-J

(2021) An imagined future community: Taiwan Biobank, Taiwanese genome, and nation-building. BioSocieties 16(1): 88–115.

86.

Tupasela

(2016) Genetic romanticism—Constructing the corpus in Finnish folklore and rare diseases. Configurations 24(2): 121–143.

87.

Tutton

(2014) Genomics and the Reimagining of Personalized Medicine. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.

88.

U.S. Department of Defense (2022) Fact Sheet on WMD Threat Reduction Efforts with Ukraine, Russia and Other Former Soviet Union Countries. Available at: https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3057517/fact-sheet-on-wmd-threat-reduction-efforts-with-ukraine-russia-and-other-former/ (accessed 7 September 2022).

89.

Winickoff

(2015) A bold experiment: Iceland’s genomic venture. In: Mascalzoni

(ed.) Ethics, Law and Governance of Biobanking: National, European and International Approaches (The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology). Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 187–209. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9573-9_13 (accessed 7 September 2021).

90.

Winickoff

(2006) Genome and nation: Iceland’s health sector database and its legacy. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 1(2): 80–105.

91.

WIRED Staff (2000) Genetics scandal inflames Iceland. WIRED, 20 March. Available at: https://www.wired.com/2000/03/genetics-scandal-inflames-iceland/ (accessed 16 November 2019).

92.

Ведомости (2022) Genetics – a global challenge. Vedomosti, 3 December. Available at: https://www.vedomosti.ru/press_releases/2022/12/03/genetika–globalnii-vizov (accessed 24 April 2023).

93.

Галимова Н (2017) Putin tells young people about technology ‘scarier than a nuclear bomb’. Available at: https://www.rbc.ru/politics/21/10/2017/59eb5a199a7947b94cc9323b (accessed 28 June 2020).

94.

Ковальчук МВ (2015) Head of Kurchatov Institute M. Kovalchuk spoke at the SF meeting within the framework of “Expert Time”. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20220330122440/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgBq7oOI8Hk (accessed 4 October 2023).

95.

Ковальчук МВ (2018) Mikhail Kovalchuk, President of the Kurchatov Institute, on breakthrough directions of modern genetics development. Available at: https://www.atomic-energy.ru/interviews/2018/10/26/89981 (accessed 28 June 2020).

96.

Макушева М (2020) Distrust, or what turns the anti-vaccination myth into an information virus. Vedomosti, 13 May. Available at: https://www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/articles/2020/05/13/830189-antiprivivochnii-mif (accessed 12 January 2021).

97.

Мац АН and Чепрасова ЕВ (2014) Anti-vaccination skepticism as a socio-psychological phenomenon. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention 5(78): 111–115.

98.

Путин ВВ (2020a) List of instructions following the meeting on the development of genetic technologies (May 14, 2020) with the President of Russia. Available at: http://kremlin.ru/acts/assignments/orders/63461 (accessed 15 June 2020).

99.

Путин ВВ (2020b) Meeting on the development of genetic technologies in Russia. Available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/63350 (accessed 15 June 2020).

100.

РФ (2018) Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 28.11.2018 No. 680.

101.

РФ (2019a) Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation of 22.04.2019 No 479.

102.

РФ (2019b) Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 11.03.2019 No. 97.

103.

РФ (2022) Federal Law of the Russian Federation of 29.12.2022 No. 643-ФЗ.

104.

Соколов И (2017) “We are an object of very great interest”: Putin spoke about the targeted collection of biomaterial of Russians. Available at: https://russian.rt.com/russia/article/444609-putin-biomaterial-rossiyane (accessed 27 June 2020).

105.

Соловьев СМ (2013) History of Russia from the Earliest Times, vol. 13. Moscow: Prospekt.

106.

ТАСС-Наука (2020) Scientist says full-genome sequencing center to be put into operation in 2020. Available at: https://nauka.tass.ru/nauka/8476765 (accessed 28 June 2020).