Combining nudge theory with learning analytics, ‘nudge analytics’, is a relatively recent phenomenon in the educational context. Used, for example, to address such issues as concerns with student (dis)engagement, nudging students to take certain action or to change a behaviour towards active learning, can make a difference. However, knowing who to nudge, how to nudge or when to nudge can be a challenge. Providing students with strategic, sensitive nudges that help to move them forward is almost an art form. It requires not only technical skills to use appropriate software and interpret data, but careful consideration of what to say and how to say it. In this article a nudge protocol is presented that can be used in online courses to encourage student engagement with key course resources that are integral to supporting their learning.
BeerCClarkKJonesD (2010) Indicators of engagement. In: Proceedings ASCILITE 2010, Sydney, Australia, 5–8 December, pp.75–86. Sydney: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education.
2.
BlumensteinMLiuDYTRichardsD, et al. (2019) Data-informed nudges for student engagement and success. In: LodgeJMHorvathJCCorrinL (eds) Learning Analytics in the Classroom: Translating Learning Analytics Research for Teachers. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.185–207.
3.
BodilyRGrahamCRBushMD (2017) Online learner engagement: Opportunities and challenges with using data analytics. Educational Technology57(1): 10–8.
4.
BrownALawrenceJBassonM, et al. (2020) A conceptual framework to enhance student online learning and engagement in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development. Epub ahead of print 29 December 2020. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2020.1860912.
5.
BurtonLJSummersJLawrenceJ, et al. (2015) Digital literacy in higher education: The rhetoric and the reality. In: HarmesMKHuijserHDanaherPA (eds) Myths in Education, Learning and Teaching: Policies, Practices and Principles. Hampshire; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.151–72.
6.
CarlessD (2020) From teacher transmission of information to student feedback literacy: Activating the learner role in feedback processes. Active Learning in Higher Education. Epub ahead of print 28 July 2020. DOI: 10.1177/146978742094584
7.
ChakaCNkhoboT (2019) Online module login data as a proxy measure of student engagement: The case of myUnisa, MoyaMA, Flipgrid, and Gephi at an ODeL institution in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education16(1): 1–22.
8.
ChakrabortyMMuyia NafukhoF (2014) Strengthening student engagement: What do students want in online courses?European Journal of Training and Development38(9): 782–802.
9.
CorriganOSmeatonAFGlynnM, et al. (2015) Using educational analytics to improve test performance. In: Design for teaching and learning in a networked world. 10th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2015 (eds ConoleGklobučarTrensingC, et al.), Toledo, Spain, 15–18 September, pp.42–55. Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
10.
CzerkawskiBCLymanEW (2016) An instructional design framework for fostering student engagement in online learning environments. TechTrends60(6): 532–9.
11.
DamgaardMTNielsenHS (2020) Behavioral economics and nudging in education: Evidence from the field. In: BradleySGreenC (eds) The Economics of Education. A Comprehensive Overview, 2nd edn.London and Oxford; San Diego, CA; Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; Elsevier, pp.21–35.
12.
DawsonPCarlessDLeePPW (2021) Authentic feedback: Supporting learners to engage in disciplinary feedback practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education46(2): 286–96.
13.
Department of Education and Training (2017) Completion Rates of Higher Education Students: Cohort Analysis, 2005-2014. Canberra: Department of Education and Training, Australian Government.
14.
DesouzaKSmithK (2016) Predictive analytics: Nudging, shoving, and smacking behaviors in higher education. EDUCASE Review51(5): 10–9.
15.
FeildJ (2015) Improving student performance using nudge analytics. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on educational data mining (eds SantosOCBoticarioJGRomeroC, et al.), Madrid, Spain, 26–29 June, pp.464–7. Madrid: International Educational Data Mining Society.
16.
FlynnD (2014) Baccalaureate attainment of college students at 4-year institutions as a function of student engagement behaviors: Social and academic student engagement behaviors matter. Research in Higher Education55(5): 467–93.
FritzJ (2013) Using Analytics at UMBC: Encouraging Student Responsibility and Identifying Effective Course Designs. Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.
HenrieCRBodilyRLarsenR, et al. (2018) Exploring the potential of LMS log data as a proxy measure of student engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education30(2): 344–62.
21.
JayaprakashSMMoodyEWLauríaEJM, et al. (2014) Early alert of academically at-risk students: An open source analytics initiative. Journal of Learning Analytics1(1): 6–47.
22.
KahuER (2013) Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education38(5): 758–73.
23.
KizilcecRFPiechCSchneiderE (2013) Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In: LAK ‘13: Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, Leuven, Belgium, 8–13 April, pp.170–9. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
24.
KuhGDCruceTMShoupR, et al. (2008) Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education79(5): 540–63.
25.
LawrenceJBrownARedmondP, et al. (2019) Engaging the disengaged: Exploring the use of course-specific learning analytics and nudging to enhance online student engagement. Student Success10: 47–58.
26.
LeeJ-S (2014) The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: Is it a myth or reality?Educational Research eJournal107: 177–85.
27.
MacfadyenLPDawsonS (2010) Mining LMS data to develop an ‘early warning system’ for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & Education54(2): 588–99.
28.
MeyerKA (2014) Student engagement in online learning: What works and why. ASHE Higher Education Report40(6): 1–114.
29.
MolloyEBoudDHendersonM (2020) Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education45(4): 527–40.
30.
NobleCBillettSArmitL, et al. (2020) It’s yours to take’: Generating learner feedback literacy in the workplace. Advances in Health Sciences Education25(1): 55–74.
31.
RedmondPHeffernanAAbawiL, et al. (2018) An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning22(1): 183–204.
32.
SelingerEWhyteK (2011) Is there a right way to nudge? The practice and ethics of choice architecture. Sociology Compass5(10): 923–35.
33.
ThalerRHSunsteinCR (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New York, NY: Penguin.
34.
TualauleleiEBurkeKFanshaweM, et al. (2021) Mapping pedagogical touchpoints: Exploring online student engagement and course design. Active Learning in Higher Education. Epub ahead of print 1 February December 2021. DOI: 10.1177/1469787421990847.
35.
WannerT (2014) Parallel universes: Student and teacher expectations and interactions in online vs face-to-face teaching and learning environments. Ergo3(3): 37–45.
36.
WestDHuijserHLizzioA, et al. (2015) Learning Analytics: Assisting Universities with Student Retention. Final Report (Part 1) Prepared for the Australian Government. Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching.
37.
WinterR (1998) Managers, spectators and citizens: Where does ‘theory’ come from in action research?Educational Action Research6(3): 361–76.
