This article reports a synthesis and meta-analysis of intervention studies investigating the effects of team-based learning on content knowledge outcomes. Team-based learning is a particular set of instructional components most often used in higher education classrooms. Authors of team-based learning reviews report that team-based learning improves students’ end of course grades, test performance, and classroom engagement. Students report that team-based learning is interesting, allows for deeper understanding of content, and prepares them more effectively for assessment and course performance. A total of 30 studies were located and synthesized. In total, 17 studies met criteria for a meta-analysis, yielding a mean effect size estimate of 0.55, p < 0.001 across all measures. Moderator analysis indicated that group size moderated the magnitude of effect to a statistically significant degree, with smaller group sizes contributing to additional effects. The meta-analysis is followed by a confirmatory synthesis of the remaining 13 studies. Implications for instruction incorporating the use of team-based learning are described.
AllenRECopelandJFranksASet al. (2013) Team-based learning in US colleges and schools of pharmacy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education77(6): 1–9.
2.
AltintasLAltintasOCaglarY (2014) Modified use of team-based learning in the ophthalmology course for fifth-year medical students. Advances in Physiology Education38(1): 46–8.
3.
AronsonEBlaneyNStephanCet al. (1978) The Jigsaw Classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
4.
BorensteinMHedgesLVHigginsJPTet al. (2009) Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
BruffeeKA (1999) Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7.
BurgessAWMcGregorDMMellisCM (2014) Applying established guidelines to team-based learning programs in medical schools: A systematic review. Academic Medicine89(4): 678–88.
8.
CardN (2012) Applied Meta-Analysis for Social Science Research. New York: Guilford Press.
9.
CarmichaelJ (2009) Team-based learning enhances performance in introductory biology. Journal of College Science Teaching38(4): 54.
10.
CheungMWL (2008) A model for integrating fixed-, random-, and mixed-effects meta-analyses in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods13(3): 182–202.
11.
ConwaySEJohnsonJLRipleyTL (2010) Integration of team-based learning strategies into a cardiovascular module. American journal of pharmaceutical education74(2): 35.
12.
EspeyM (2008) Does space matter? Classroom design and team-based learning. Review of Agricultural Economics30(4): 764–75.
13.
FatmiMHartlingLHillierTet al. (2013) The effectiveness of team-based learning on learning outcomes in health professions education: BEME guide no. 30. Medical Teacher35(12): e1608–24.
14.
FuchsLSDenoSLMirkinPK (1984) The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal21(2): 449–60.
15.
GillespieDRoosJSlaughterC (2006a) Undergraduates’ ambivalence about leadership in small groups. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching17(3): 33–49.
16.
GillespieDRosamondSThomasE (2006b) Grouped out? Default strategies for participating in multiple small groups. Journal of General Education55(2): 81–102.
17.
HaidetPKubitzKMcCormackWT (2014) Analysis of the team-based learning literature: TBL comes of age. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching25(3–4): 303–33.
18.
HakeRR (1998) Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics66(1): 1–26.
19.
HedgesL (1981) Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Education Statistics6(2): 107–28.
20.
HerrmannKJ (2013) The impact of cooperative learning on student engagement: Results from an intervention. Active Learning in Higher Education14(3): 175–87.
21.
HillyardCGillespieDLittigP (2010) University students’ attitudes about learning in small groups after frequent participation. Active Learning in Higher Education11(1): 9–20.
HrynchakPBattyH (2012) The educational theory basis of team-based learning. Medical Teacher34(10): 796–801.
24.
InuwaIMAl-RawahyMRoychoudhryS (2012) Implementing a modified team-based learning strategy in the first phase of an outcome-based curriculum–Challenges and prospects. Medical Teacher34(7): e492–99.
25.
JacksonJMWilliamsKD (1985) Social loafing on difficult tasks: Working collectively can improve performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology49(4): 937.
26.
JusticeCRiceJWarryWet al. (2007) Inquiry in higher education: Reflections and directions on course design and teaching methods. Innovative Higher Education31(4): 201–14.
27.
KaganS (1994) Cooperative Learning, vol. 2. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Kagan Cooperative Learning.
28.
KyndtERaesELismontBet al. (2013) A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings?Educational Research Review10: 133–49.
29.
LeaMRStreetBV (1998) Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education232(2): 157–72.
30.
LeaMRStreetBV (2006) The “academic literacies” model: Theory and applications. Theory into Practice45(4): 368–77.
31.
LetassyNAFugateSEMedinaMSet al. (2008) Using team-based learning in an endocrine module taught across two campuses. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education72(5): 103.
32.
LidenRCNagaoDHParsoCK (1985) Student and faculty attitudes concerning the use of group projects. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review10(4): 32–8.
33.
LillisTScottM (2007) Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics4(1): 5–32.
34.
LizzioAWilsonK (2005) Self-managed learning groups in higher education: Students’ perceptions of process and outcomes. British Journal of Educational Psychology75(3): 373–90.
35.
MachemerPLCrawfordP (2007) Student perceptions of active learning in a large cross-disciplinary classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education8(1): 9–30.
MicariMPazosP (2014) Worrying about what others think: A social-comparison concern intervention in small learning groups. Active Learning in Higher Education15(3): 249–62.
38.
MichaelsenLKSweetM (2008) The essential elements of team-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning116: 7–28.
39.
MichaelsenLKSweetM (2011) Team-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning2011(128): 41–51.
40.
MichaelsenLKKnightABFinkLD (2004) Team-Based Learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups in College Teaching. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
41.
NiederGLParmeleeDXStolfiAet al. (2005) Team-based learning in a medical gross anatomy and embryology course. Clinical Anatomy18(1): 56–63.
42.
NyindoMKitauJLisasiEet al. (2014) Introduction of team-based learning (TBL) at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College: Experience with the ectoparasites module. Medical Teacher36(4): 308–13.
43.
NystrandMGamoranA (1991) Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English25(3): 261–90.
44.
PhelpsRP (2012) The effect of testing on student achievement, 1910–2010. International Journal of Testing12(1): 21–43.
45.
PoggeE (2013) A team-based learning course on nutrition and lifestyle modification. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education77(5): 103.
46.
RaoYKShenoyGK (2013) Introducing team based learning in undergraduate pharmacology. Indian Journal of Pharmacology45(1): 102.
47.
RobinsonLHarrisABurtonR (2015) Saving face: Managing rapport in a problem based learning group. Active Learning in Higher Education16(1): 11–24.
48.
RogersC (1983) Freedom to Learn: A View of What Education Might Become. Columbus, OH: Charles E Merrill.
49.
ShanahanTShanahanC (2012) What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter?Topics in Language Disorders32(1): 7–18.
50.
SharanS (ed.) (1990) Cooperative Learning: Theory and Research. New York: Praeger.
51.
ShulmanLS (2005) Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus134(3): 52–9.
52.
SiskRJ (2011) Team-based learning: Systematic research review. Journal of Nursing Education50(12): 665–9.
53.
SpringerLStanneMEDonovanSS (1999) Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research69(1): 21–51.
54.
SwansonEWanzekJHaringCet al. (2013) Intervention fidelity in special and general education research journals. The Journal of Special Education47(1): 3–13.
55.
SwansonHL (1999) Reading research for students with LD: A meta-analysis of intervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities32(6): 504–32.
56.
SweetMMichaelsenLK (2012) Critical thinking and engagement: Creating cognitive apprenticeships with team-based learning. In: SweetMMichaelsenLK (eds) Team-Based Learning in the Social Sciences and Humanities: Group Work That Works to Generate Critical Thinking and Engagement. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, pp. 5–32. Available at: https://styluspub.presswarehouse.com/Books/Features.aspx
57.
ThompsonRAZamboangaBL (2004) Academic aptitude and prior knowledge as predictors of student achievement in introduction to psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology96(4): 778–84.
58.
U.S. Department of Education (2014) What Works Clearinghouse Standard Handbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
59.
VasanNSDeFouwDOHollandBK (2008) Modified use of team-based learning for effective delivery of medical gross anatomy and embryology. Anatomical Sciences Education1(1): 3–9.
60.
ZgheibNKSimaanJASabraR (2010) Using team-based learning to teach pharmacology to second year medical students improves student performance. Medical Teacher32(2): 130–135.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
