Fluent oral reading is an essential literacy skill, and data suggest that it is a consistent and persistent problem for many elementary school children. Peer-mediated instruction in which students work together to support each other is an evidence-based practice for improving performance in a variety of academic areas. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of a peer-mediated fluency-building intervention for struggling readers in second grade. The intervention was provided to small groups of students referred to as difficult-to-remediate, treatment resisters, nonresponders, or lower responders in similar research. Oral reading fluency performance for students who received supplemental intervention (n = 17) was statistically significantly better than that for their peers who received only typical classroom instruction (n = 17). The effects of enhanced fluency instruction were evident across multiple benchmarks, and significant relationships were evident between oral reading fluency and comprehension. The authors discuss the findings in the context of similar peer-mediated interventions and the emerging development of targeted interventions to support response-to-intervention practices.
Allington, R.L. ( 2001). Kids need to learn to read fluently. In R. L. Allington (Ed.), What really matters for struggling readers (pp. 70-86). New York: Addison Wesley.
6.
Ardoin, S.P., Eckert, T.L., & Cole, C.A.S. ( 2008). Promoting generalization of reading: A comparison of two fluency-based interventions for improving general education student’s oral reading rate. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 237-252.
7.
Ardoin, S.P., McCall, M., & Klubnik, C. ( 2007). Promoting generalization of oral reading fluency: Providing drill versus practice opportunities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 55-70.
8.
Buck, J., & Torgesen, J. ( 2003). The relationship between performance on a measure of oral reading fluency and performance on the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (Tech. Rep. No. 1). Tallahassee: Florida Center for Reading Research. Available at http://www.fcrr.org/technicalreports/Technical-Report1.pdf
9.
Chard, D.J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B.J. ( 2002) A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386-406.
10.
Cunningham, P. ( 2005). Struggling readers: "If they don’t read much, how they ever gonna get good?" Reading Teacher, 59, 88-90.
11.
Daane, M.C., Campbell, J.R., Grigg, W.S., Goodman, M.J., & Oranje, A. ( 2005). Fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading (NCES 2006-469). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Dudley, A.M., & Mather, N. ( 2005). Getting up to speed on reading fluency. New England Reading Association Journal, 41(1), 22-27.
15.
Dynamic Measurement Group. (2008). DIBELS research references. Retrieved August 18, 2008, from http://dibels.uoregon.edu/techreports/DIBELS_References.pdf
16.
Eiseman, J.W., Fleming, D.S., & Roody, D.S. ( 1990). The school improvement leader: Four perspectives on change in schools. Andover, MA: Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvement.
17.
Foorman, B., Francis, D., Fletcher, J., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. ( 1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37-55.
18.
Fountas, I.C., & Pinnell, G.S. ( 1996). Guided Reading: Good first teaching for all children . Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
19.
Fuchs, D., & Deshler, D.D. ( 2007). What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention (and shouldn’t be afraid to ask). Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 129-136.
20.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. ( 2005). Responsiveness-to-interventions: A blueprint for practitioners, policy makers, and parents. Teaching Exceptional Children , 38, 57-59.
21.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., & Burish, P. ( 2000). Peer-assisted learning strategies: An evidence-based practice to promote reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(2), 85-91.
22.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Thompson, A., Svenson, E., Yen, L., Al Otaiba, S., Yang, N. . . . Saenz, L. ( 2001). Peer-assisted learning strategies in reading: Extensions for kindergarten, first grade, and high school. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 15-21.
23.
Fuchs, D., Mock, M., Morgan, P.L., & Young, C.L. ( 2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157-161.
24.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Hosp, M.K. ( 2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies in Reading, 5, 239-256.
25.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. ( 1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures . Remedial and Special Education, 9, 20-28.
26.
Good, R.H., & Kaminski, R.A. (2002a). Development and readability of DIBELS oral reading fluency passages for first through third grades (Technical Report No. 10). Eugene: University of Oregon.
27.
Good, R.H., & Kaminski, R.A. (2002b). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available from http://dibels.uoregon.edu/
28.
Greenwood, C.R., Arreaga-Mayer, C., Utley, C.A., Gavin, K.M., & Terry, B.J. ( 2001). Classwide Peer Tutoring learning management system: Applications with elementary-level English language learners. Remedial and Special Education, 2234-47.
29.
Hasbrouck, J.E., & Tindal, G. ( 1992). Curriculum-based oral reading fluency norms for students in grades 2 through 5. Teaching Exceptional Children, 24(3), 41-44.
Jenkins, J.R., Fuchs, L.S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S.L. ( 2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 719-729.
32.
King-Sears, M.E. ( 2001). Institutionalizing peer-mediated instruction and intervention in schools: Beyond ‘‘train and hope.’’ Remedial and Special Education, 22, 89-101.
33.
Klauda, S.L., & Guthrie, J.T. ( 2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology , 100, 310-321.
34.
Kuhn, M.R., & Stahl, S.A. ( 2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices . Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3-21.
35.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S.J. ( 1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
36.
Maheady, L., Harper, G.F., & Sacca, M.K. ( 1993). Classwide Student Tutoring Teams: A teachers manual and video. Fredonia: School of Education, SUNY College-Fredonia.
37.
Maheady, L., Harper, G.F., Sacca, M.K., & Mallette, B. ( 1991). Classwide Student Tutoring Teams (CSTT): Instructor’s manual and video package. Fredonia: School of Education, SUNY College-Fredonia.
38.
Maheady, L., Mallette, B., & Harper, G.F. ( 2001). Peer-mediated instruction and interventions and students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 4-14.
39.
Maheady, L., Mallette, B., & Harper, G.F. ( 2006). Four Classwide Peer Tutoring models: Similarities, differences, and implications for research and practice. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22, 65-89.
40.
Martens, B.K., Eckert, T.L., Begeny, J.C., Lewandowski, L.J., DiGennaro, F.D., Montarello, S.A., Arbolino, L.A., & Reed, D.D. ( 2007). Effects of fluency-building program on the reading performance of low-achieving second and third grade students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 39-54.
41.
McMaster, K., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. ( 2007). Promises and limitation of peer-assisted learning strategies in reading. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal , 2, 97-112.
42.
Nathan, R.G., & Stanovich, K.E. (1991). The causes and consequences of difference in reading fluency. Theory Into Practice, 30, 76-84.
43.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
44.
Pinnell, G.S., Pikulski, J.J., Wixson, K.K., Campbell, J.R., Gough, P.B., & Beatty, A.S. ( 1995). Listening to children read aloud: Data from NAEP’s Integrated Reading Performance Record (IRPR) at grade 4 (NCES 95-726). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics .
45.
Rasinski, T. ( 2000). Speed does matter in reading. The Reading Teacher, 54, 146-151.
46.
Rasinski, T. ( 2003). The fluent reader: Oral reading strategies for building word recognition, fluency and comprehension. New York: Scholastic Professional Books.
Rasinski, T.V., Padak, N.D., McKeon, C.A., Wilfong, L.G., Friedauer, J.A., & Heim, P. ( 2005). Is reading fluency a key to successful high school reading ? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49, 22-27.
49.
Reutzel, D.R., Hollingsworth, P.M., & Eldredge, J.L. (1994). Oral reading instruction: The impact on student reading development. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 40-62.
50.
Roehrig, A.D., Petscher, Y., Nettles, S.M., Hudson, R.F., & Torgesen, J.K. (2008). Accuracy of the DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency measure for predicting third grade reading comprehension outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 343-366.
51.
Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J.E., & Bolt, S. ( 2009) Assessment in special and inclusive education (11th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
52.
Samuels, S.J. ( 1979). The method of repeated reading. The Reading Teacher, 32, 403-408.
53.
Schilling, S.G., Carlisle, J.F., Scott, S.E., & Zeng, J. ( 2007). Are fluency measures accurate predictors of reading achievement ? Elementary School Journal, 107, 429-448.
54.
Schwanenflugel, P.J., Meisinger, E.B., Wisenbaker, J.M., Kuhn, M.R., Strauss, G.P., & Morris, R.D. ( 2006). Becoming a fluent and automatic reader in the early elementary school years. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 496-522.
55.
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
56.
Snyder, T.D., Tan, A.G., & Hoffman, C.M. ( 2006). Digest of education statistics 2005 (NCES 2006-30). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, Institute for Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
57.
Therrien, W.J. ( 2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 252-261.
58.
Thompson, B. ( 2006). Foundations of behavioral statistics. New York: Guilford.
59.
U.S. Department of Education. (2007). 27th annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 2005 (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Author.
60.
Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L.S. ( 2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137-146.
61.
Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Murray, C.S., Sammacca, N., Linan-Thompson, S., & Woodruff, A.L. (2009). Response to early reading intervention: Examining higher and lower responders. Exceptional Children, 75, 165-183.
62.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Sipay, E.R., Small, S.G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., Denckla, M.B. ( 1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.
63.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Small, S., & Fanuele, D.P. ( 2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first grade interventions, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 157-169.
64.
Yovanoff, P., Duesbery, L., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. ( 2005). Grade-level invariance of a theoretical causal structure predicting reading comprehension with vocabulary and oral reading fluency . Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24, 4-12.
