Research suggests a negative relationship between frequent use of communication technologies, such as text messaging and social network sites, and academic performance, but the nature of the relationship needs to be explored in greater detail. This study explored the relationship between use of communication technologies and self-reported study skills. A total of 74 first-year university students completed the online Learning and Study Strategies Inventory and reported on how frequently they used text messaging, instant messaging, and online social networks such as Facebook. Correlation analysis indicated a negative relationship between frequency of communications technology use and the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory measure of Concentration. While the study does not prove a causal relationship, it provides more detail on the specific study skills challenges students may be facing when they interrupt their studying with frequent online social communication. This increased understanding can help educators tailor study skills interventions and support more directly to students’ needs.
AllowayTPAllowayRG (2012) The impact of engagement with social networking sites (SNSs) on cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior28(5): 1748–54.
2.
BauerleinM (2008) The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future. New York: Penguin Group.
3.
BishopJLVerlegerM (2013) The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In: ASEE national conference proceedings, Atlanta, GA, 23–26 June.
4.
BowmanLLLevineLEWaiteBMet al. (2010) Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading. Computers & Education54(4): 927–31.
5.
BradleyCWeissMDaviesCet al. (2010) A little less conversation, a little more texting please—A blended learning model of using mobiles in the classroom. In: Proceedings of the fifth international blended learning conference: Developing blended learning communities, 16–17 June. Hatfield, UK: University of Hertfordshire, pp. 1–11.
6.
CarrN (2010) The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
7.
CredéMKuncelNR (2008) Study Habits, skills, and attitudes: The third pillar supporting collegiate academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science3(6): 425–53.
8.
DeschryverMMishraPKoehlerMet al. (2009) Moodle vs. Facebook: Does using Facebook for discussions in an online course enhance perceived social presence and student interaction? In: Society for information technology and teacher education international conference2–6 March, AACE, pp. 329–36.
9.
DurkinKMainA (2002) Discipline-based study skills support for first-year undergraduate students. Active Learning in Higher Education3(1): 24–39.
10.
EllisYDanielsBJaureguiA (2010) The effect of multitasking on the grade performance of business students. Research in Higher Education Journal8(1): 1–10.
Fernández-CastilloACaurcelMJ (2015) State test-anxiety, selective attention and concentration in university students. International Journal of Psychology50(4): 265–21.
13.
FieldA (2005) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: SAGE.
14.
FrancoCMañasICangasAet al. (2010) The applications of mindfulness with students of secondary school: Results on the academic performance, self-concept and anxiety. In: LytrasMCOrdonezdePablosPZidermanAet al. (eds) Knowledge Management, Information Systems, E-learning, and Sustainability Research. Proceedings of the Third World Summit on the Knowledge Society (WSKS)22–24 September. Berlin: Springer, pp. 83–97.
15.
FriedCB (2008) In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education50(3): 906–14.
16.
FroeseADCarpenterCNInmanDAet al. (2012) Effects of classroom cell phone use on expected and actual learning. College Student Journal46(2): 323–32.
17.
GengG (2013) Investigating the use of text messages in mobile learning. Active Learning in Higher Education14(1): 77–87.
18.
GeorgeS (2015) The cure for the distracted mind: Why law schools should teach mindfulness. Duquesne University Law Review53(1): 14–23.
19.
HallowellEM (2005) Overloaded circuits: Why smart people underperform. Harvard Business Review83(1): 54–62.
20.
HargittaiEHsiehY-lP (2010) Predictors and Consequences of Differentiated Practices on Social Network Sites. Information, Communication & Society13(4): 515–36.
21.
HattieJBiggsJPurdieN (1996) Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research66(2): 99–136.
22.
HembrookeHGayG (2003) The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education15(1): 46–64.
23.
IvanicREdwardsRSatchwellCet al. (2007) Possibilities for pedagogy in further education: Harnessing the abundance of literacy. British Educational Research Journal33(5): 703–21.
24.
JuncoR (2012) Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior28(1): 187–98.
JuncoRCottenSR (2012) No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Computers & Education59(2): 505–14.
27.
Kassens-NoorE (2012) Twitter as a teaching practice to enhance active and informal learning in higher education: The case of sustainable tweets. Active Learning in Higher Education13(1): 9–21.
28.
KirschnerPAKarpinskiAC (2010) Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior26(6): 1237–45.
29.
KraushaarJMNovakDC (2010) Examining the affects of student multitasking with laptops during the lecture. Journal of Information Systems Education21(2): 241–51.
30.
KubeyRWLavinMJBarrowsJR (2001) Internet use and collegiate academic performance decrements: Early findings. Journal of Communication51(2): 366–82.
31.
KuznekoffJHTitsworthS (2013) The Impact of mobile phone usage on student learning. Communication Education62(3): 233–52.
32.
LichyJ (2012) Towards an international culture: Gen Y students and SNS?Active Learning in Higher Education13(2): 101–16.
33.
McLaughlinJERothMTGlattDMet al. (2014) The flipped classroom: A course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Academic Medicine89(2): 236–43.
34.
MasonGSShumanTRCookKE (2013) Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education56(4): 430–5.
35.
OphirENassCWagnerADet al. (2009) Cognitive control in media multitasking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America10637(37): 15583–7.
PrestridgeS (2014) A focus on students’ use of Twitter—Their interactions with each other, content and interface. Active Learning in Higher Education15(2): 101–15.
39.
PrevattF (2006) The revised learning and study strategies inventory: An evaluation of competing models. Educational and Psychological Measurement66(3): 448–58.
40.
RamsburgJTYoumansRJ (2014) Meditation in the higher-education classroom: Meditation training improves student knowledge retention during lectures. Mindfulness5(4): 431–41.
41.
RykerRVioscaCLawrenceSet al. (2011) Texting and the efficacy of mnemonics: Is too much texting detrimental?Information Systems Education Journal9(2): 27–33.
42.
SempleRJ (2010) Does mindfulness meditation enhance attention? A Randomized Controlled Trial. Mindfulness1(2): 121–130.
43.
ShapiroSLBrownKWAstinJ (2011) Toward the integration of meditation into higher education: A review of research evidence. Teachers College Record113(3): 493–528.
ThompsonP (2013) The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers & Education65(1): 12–33.
46.
WangQWooHLQuekCLet al. (2012) Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology43(3): 428–38.
47.
WeinsteinCEPalmerDR (2002) LASSI User’s Manual for Those Administering the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory, 2nd edn.Clearwater, FL: H&H Publishing Company, pp. 1–28.
48.
WentworthDKMiddletonJH (2014) Technology use and academic performance. Computers & Education78(1): 306–311.
49.
WingateU (2006) Doing away with ‘study skills’. Teaching in Higher Education11(4): 457–69.
50.
WoodEZivcakovaLGentilePet al. (2012) Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning. Computers & Education58(1): 365–74.
51.
XuJ (2015) Investigating factors that influence conventional distraction and tech-related distraction in math homework. Computers & Education81(1): 304–14.
