It is through working in groups that students develop cooperative learning skills and experience. However, group work activity often leads students into a difficult experience, especially for first-year students who are not familiar with group work activities at university. This study explores obstacles faced by first-year students during their group work activities. It investigates whether a group of students with a similar learning style (homogeneous group) experience different obstacles compared to a group of students with a diverse learning style (heterogeneous group). In addition, to identify the difference, if any, between a group formed by a tutor and one where the students form the group themselves, tutor and self-allocated group allocations are explored. This study focuses on obstacles experienced by these students during group work activities. Using a sample of more than 200 students over a period of 3 years, the types and the changes of obstacles in different stages of group life are explored. The findings show that students experience obstacles which can be classified into personal and social, leadership and management, and task-related obstacles. Those obstacles were not static but increased over time. The study also investigates the impact of different methods of forming groups and whether this impacted on obstacles experienced. Overall, different interventions prompted different patterns of obstacle development.
AggarwalPO’BrienCL (2008) Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education30(3): 255–64.
2.
BarthMGodemannJRieckmannM. (2007) Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education8(4): 416–30.
3.
BonwellCCEisonJA (1991) Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC higher education reports, ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.
4.
BraxtonJMMilemJFSullivanAS (2000) The influence of active learning on the college student departure process: Toward a revision of Tinto’s theory. Journal of Higher Education71(5): 569–90.
5.
BrockbankAMcGillI (2007) Facilitating Reflective Learning in Higher Education. London: McGraw-Hill.
6.
BurdettJHastieB (2009) Predicting Satisfaction with Group Work Assignments. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice6(1): 61–71.
7.
ChengWYLamSFChanCY (2008) When high achievers and low achievers work in the same group: The roles of group heterogeneity and processes in project-based learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology78(2): 205–21.
8.
CohenEG (1994) Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research64(1): 1–35.
9.
ColbeckCLCampbellSEBjorklundSA (2000) Grouping in the dark: What college students learn from group projects. Journal of Higher Education71(1): 60–83.
10.
CollierKG (1980) Peer-group learning in higher education: The development of higher order skills. Studies in Higher Education5(1): 55–62.
11.
DijkstraPKuyperHvan der WerfG. (2008) Social comparison in the classroom: A review. Review of Educational Research78(4): 828–79.
12.
DommeyerCJ (2007) Using the diary method to deal with social loafers on the group project: Its effects on peer evaluations, group behavior, and attitudes. Journal of Marketing Education29(2): 175–88.
13.
DweckCS (1986) Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist41(10): 1040–48.
14.
FelderRMSilvermanLK (1988) Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education78(7): 674–81.
15.
FelderRMSpurlinJ (2005) Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. International Journal of Engineering Education21(1): 103–112.
16.
FrenchKAKottkeJL (2013) Teamwork satisfaction: Exploring the multilevel interaction of teamwork interest and group extraversion. Active Learning in Higher Education46(5): 536–75.
17.
GregoryRThorleyL (eds) (2013) Using Group-Based Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
18.
HallDBuzwellS (2012) The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education14(1): 37–49.
19.
HendryGDHeinrichPLyonPM. (2005) Helping students understand their learning styles: Effects on study self-efficacy, preference for group work, and group climate. Educational Psychology25(4): 395–407.
20.
HillyardCGillespieDLittigP (2010) University students’ attitudes about learning in small groups after frequent participation. Active Learning in Higher Education11(1): 9–20.
21.
HuxhamMLandR (2000) Assigning students in group work projects. Can we do better than random?Innovations in Education and Teaching International37(1): 17–22.
22.
JehnKAMannixEA (2001) The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal44(2): 238–51.
23.
JohnsonRTJohnsonDW (1986) Cooperative learning in the science classroom. Science and Children24: 31–32.
24.
JohnsonDWJohnsonRT (1999) Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice38(2): 67–73.
25.
JohnsonDWJohnsonRT (2002) Learning together and alone: Overview and meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education22(1): 95–105.
26.
LiMCampbellJ (2008) Asian students’ perceptions of group work and group assignments in a New Zealand tertiary institution. Intercultural Education19(3): 203–16.
LockheedMEHarrisAMNemceffWP (1983) Sex and social influence: Does sex function as a status characteristic in mixed-sex groups of children?Journal of Educational Psychology75(6): 877–88.
29.
McCorkleDEReardonJAlexanderJF (1999) Undergraduate marketing students, group projects, and teamwork: The good, the bad, and the ugly?Journal of Marketing Education21(2): 106–17.
30.
MicariMDraneD (2011) Intimidation in small learning groups: The roles of social-comparison concern, comfort, and individual characteristics in student academic outcomes. Active Learning in Higher Education12(3): 175–87.
31.
MicariMPazosP (2014) Worrying about what others think: A social-comparison concern intervention in small learning groups. Active Learning in Higher Education15(3): 249–62.
32.
MonteilJMHuguetP (1993) The influence of social comparison situations on individual task performance: Experimental illustrations. International Journal of Psychology28(5): 627–43.
33.
MugnyGButeraFFalomir PichastorJM (2001) Social influence and threat in social comparison between self and source’s competence: Relational factors affecting the transmission of knowledge. In: ButeraFMugnyG (eds) Social Influence in Social Reality. Promoting Individual and Social Change. Seattle: Hogrefe and Huber, pp. 225–47.
34.
OnwuegbuzieAJCollinsKMJiaoQG (2009) Performance of cooperative learning groups in a postgraduate education research methodology course: The role of social interdependence. Active Learning in Higher Education10(3): 265–77.
35.
PetersonSEMillerJA (2004) Comparing the quality of students’ experiences during cooperative learning and large-group instruction. The Journal of Educational Research97(3): 123–34.
36.
Scott-LaddBChanCC (2008) Using action research to teach students to manage team learning and improve teamwork satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education9(3): 231–48.
37.
SharanY (2010) Cooperative learning for academic and social gains: Valued pedagogy, problematic practice. European Journal of Education45(2): 300–13.
38.
SlavinRE (1983) When does cooperative learning increase student achievement?Psychological Bulletin94(3): 429.
SobralDT (1997) Improving learning skills: A self-help group approach. Higher Education33(1): 39–50.
41.
StevensRJSlavinRE (1995) The cooperative elementary school: Effects on students’ achievement, attitudes, and social relations. American Educational Research Journal32(2): 321–51.
42.
TottenSSillsTDigbyA. (1991) Cooperative Learning: A Guide to Research. New York: Garland.
43.
TuckmanBW (1965) Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin63(6): 384.
44.
TuckmanBWJensenMAC (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group & Organization Studies2(4): 419–27.
45.
WangY (2012) Mainland Chinese students’ group work adaptation in a UK business school. Teaching in Higher Education17(5): 523–35.
46.
WebbNMTroperJDFallR (1995) Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology87(3): 406–23.
47.
WebbNM (1982) Student interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational Research52(3): 421–45.
48.
WheelanSAHochbergerJM (1996) Validation studies of the group development questionnaire. Small Group Research27(1): 143–70.
49.
WheelanSALiskAR (2000) Cohort group effectiveness and the educational achievement of adult undergraduate students. Small Group Research31(6): 724–38.
50.
WilkinsonIAFungIY (2002) Small-group composition and peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research37(5): 425–47.
51.
YaziciHJ (2005) A study of collaborative learning style and team learning performance. Education + Training47(3): 216–29.
