Despite increasing attention to the challenges of supervising international doctoral students, little research has been conducted to examine supervisory feedback practice with international students and its impact on the thesis writing process. This exploratory qualitative study seeks to fill the gap and contribute to understanding the feedback experiences of international students in doctoral research supervision. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews with a group of international doctoral students from non-English-speaking backgrounds. The interviewees reported a range of both positive and negative feedback experiences. The interview accounts reflected the culturally embedded impact of supervisory feedback and the pedagogical needs of international doctoral students in the thesis writing process. This study suggests that dialogic and culturally sensitive feedback approaches are essential for supervising international students. The students’ voices revealed through this study provide implications for enhancing doctoral research supervision with international students.
Adrian-Taylor RS, Noels KA and Tischler K. ( 2007) Conflict between international graduate students and faculty supervisors: Toward effective conflict prevention and management strategies . Journal of Studies in International Education11(1): 90-117.
2.
Cadman K. ( 1997) Thesis writing for international students: A question of identity? English for Specific Purposes16(1): 3-14.
3.
Cadman K. ( 2000) Voices in the air: Evaluation of the learning experiences of international postgraduates and their supervisors. Teaching in Higher Education5(4): 475-9.
4.
Caffarella RS and Barnett B. ( 2000) Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education25(1): 39-52.
5.
Chanock K. ( 2000) Comments on essays: Do students understand what tutors write? Teaching in Higher Education5(1): 95-105.
6.
Cortazzi M. and Jin L. ( 1997) Communication for learning across cultures. In: MacNamara D and Harris R (eds) Overseas Students in Higher Education. London: Routledge, pp. 79-90.
7.
Devenish R., Dyer S., Jefferson T., Lord L., Leeuwen S and Fazakerley V (2009) Peer to peer support: The disappearing work in the doctoral student experience. Higher Education Research and Development28(1): 59-70.
8.
Fiske DW ( 1992) Strategies for planning and revising research reports . In: Moxley JM (ed.) Writing and Publishing for Academic Authors. New York: University Press of America, pp. 221-33.
9.
Han J. and Zhao D. ( 2008) Mobilising ‘double knowing’: Pedagogical leadership for internationalising higher education. In: McConachie J (ed.) Changing University Learning and Teaching . Brisbane: PostEd Press, pp. 237-60.
10.
Harman G. ( 2003) International PhD students in Australian universities: Financial support, course experience and career plans. International Journal of Educational Development23: 339-51.
11.
Hofstede G. ( 2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE .
12.
Hounsell D., McCune V., Hounsell J. and Litjens J. ( 2008) The quality of guidance and feedback to students. Higher Education Research and Development27(1): 55-67.
13.
Hyland F. ( 2000) ESL Writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students . Language Teaching Research4(1): 33-54.
14.
Hyland F. and Hyland D. ( 2001) Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback . Journal of Second Language Writing10(3): 185-212.
15.
Hyatt DF ( 2005) ‘Yes, a very good point!’: A critical genre analysis of a corpus of feedback commentaries on master of education assignments . Teaching in Higher Education10(3): 339-53.
16.
Knowles S. ( 1999) Feedback on writing in postgraduate supervision: Echoes in response - context, continuity and resonance. In: Holbrook A and Johnson S (eds) Supervision of Postgraduate Research Education. Coldstream , Victoria: Australian Association for Research in Education, pp. 113-28.
17.
Krathwohl DR ( 1997) Methods of Educational and Social Science Research: An Integrated Approach, 2nd edn. White Plains, NY: Longman.
18.
Kumar V. and Stracke E. ( 2007) An analysis of written feedback on a PhD thesis. Teaching in Higher Education12(4): 461-70.
19.
McAlpine L. and Norton J. ( 2006) Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: An integrative framework for research and action. Higher Education Research and Development25(1): 3-17.
20.
Miles MG and Huberman AM ( 1994) Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE .
21.
Mutch A. ( 2003) Exploring the practice of feedback to students. Active Learning in Higher Education4(1): 24-38.
22.
Pitts S. E (2005) ‘Testing, testing’ . . . How do students use written feedback?Active Learning in Higher Education6(3): 218-29.
23.
Pokorny H. and Pickford P.(2010) Complexity, cues and relationships: Student perceptions of feedback . Active Learning in Higher Education11(1): 21-30.
24.
Race P. ( 2005) Making Learning Happen. A Guide for Post-Compulsory Education . London: SAGE.
25.
Rae AM and Cochrane DK ( 2008) Listening to students: How to make written assessment feedback useful. Active Learning in Higher Education9(3): 217-30.
26.
Rice KG, Choi C., Zhang Y., Villegas J., Ye HJ, Anderson D., Nesic A and Bigler M (2009) International student perspectives on graduate advising relationships. Journal of Counselling Psychology56(3): 376-91.
27.
Robinson-Pant A. ( 2009) Changing academies: Exploring international PhD students’ perspectives on ‘host’ and ‘home’ universities. Higher Education Research and Development28(4): 417-29.
28.
Ryan Y. and Zuber-Skerritt O. ( 1999) Supervising Postgraduates from Non-English Speaking Backgrounds . Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
29.
Ryan J. and Viete R.(2009) Respectful interactions: Learning with international students in the English-speaking academy. Teaching in Higher Education14(3): 303-14.
30.
Stracke E. and Kumar V.(2010) Feedback and self-regulated learning: Insights from supervisors’ and PhD examiners’ reports. Reflective Practice11(1): 19-32.
31.
Strang KD ( 2007) Improving supervision of cross-cultural postgraduate university students. International Journal of Learning and Change4(2): 181-202.
32.
Wang T. and Li YL ( 2008) Understanding international postgraduate research students’ challenges and pedagogical needs in thesis writing. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning4(3): 88-96.
33.
Wang T. ( 2008) Chinese Educational Leaders’ Conceptions of Learning and Leadership: An Interpretative Study in an International Education Context . Saarbrücken: VDM.
34.
Woodward-Kron R. ( 2007) Negotiating meanings and scaffolding learning: Writing support for non-English speaking background postgraduate students. Higher Education Research and Development26(3): 253-68.
35.
Young P. ( 2000) ‘I might as well give up’: Self esteem and mature students’ feelings about feedback on assignments. Journal of Further and Higher Education24(3): 409-18.
