This paper explores the role of heritage work in extractive zones, focusing on how different stakeholders—industries, communities, and governments—leverage heritage to assert claims and achieve visibility. This paper is based on a multiyear research project examining the now-canceled Jordan Cove Energy Project and Pacific Connector Pipeline in Oregon. The focus here centers on defining heritage work and its use by various actors to navigate claims of legitimacy and access. I argue that in extractive contexts, heritage work is more than legal work or documentation; it is also a tool that communities use to refuse the erasure of connections to land and culture and to affirm connections. By defining heritage work and extractive zones in the same frame, this paper directs attention to how heritage is taken up, dismissed, legitimized, or valorized.
AbdullahARahmanS (2021) Social impacts of a mega-dam project as perceived by local, resettled and displaced communities: a case study of Merowe Dam, Sudan. Economies9(4): 140–172.
2.
BairdMF (2017) Critical Theory and the Anthropology of Heritage Landscapes. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.
3.
BairdM (2022) Waste sits in places: post-extractive landscapes as heritage. In: PettenatiG (ed) Landscapes as Heritage. Chicago, IL: Routledge, 204–215.
4.
BakerJMWestmanCN (2018) Extracting knowledge: social science, environmental impact assessment, and indigenous consultation in the oil sands of Alberta, Canada. The Extractive Industries and Society5(1): 144–153.
5.
BejanRMurvaiPMihăilăI, et al. (2015) Transnational responses to global capitalism: the case study of the Roşia Montană campaign. Transnational Social Review5(2): 199–207.
6.
BregliaL (2013) Living with Oil: Promises, Peaks, and Declines on Mexico’s Gulf Coast. Austin: University of Texas Press.
7.
BsheerR (2017) Heritage as war. International Journal of Middle East Studies49(4): 729–734.
8.
BsheerR (2020) Archive Wars: The Politics of History in Saudi Arabia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
CarmanJ (2005) Against Cultural Property: Archaeology, Heritage and Ownership. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.
10.
CarringtonKPereiraM (2011) Assessing the social impacts of the resources boom on rural communities. Rural Society21(1): 2–20.
11.
CoombeRJBairdM (2016) The limits of heritage: corporate interests and cultural rights on resource frontiers. In: LoganWNic CraithMKockelU (eds). A Companion to Heritage Studies. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 337–354.
12.
CoumansC (2011) Whose development? Mining, local resistance, and development agendas. In: SagebienJLindsayNM (eds). Governance Ecosystems. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 114–132.
13.
DoelleB (2017) Bears Ears archaeological experts gathering: assessing and looking ahead. Report, Archaeology Southwest and Friends of Cedar Mesa, Arizona. Available at:https://www.archaeologysouthwest.org/pdf/Bears_Ears_Report.pdf(accessed 9 February 2024).
EngelsB (2017) Not all glitter is gold: mining conflicts in Burkina Faso. In: EngelsBDietzK (eds). Contested Extractivism, Society and the State: Struggles over Mining and Land. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 149–169.
16.
ErlandsonJMMossML (1999) The systematic use of radiocarbon dating in archaeological surveys in coastal and other erosional environments. American Antiquity64(3): 431–443.
17.
EstesN (2019) Our History Is the Future: Standing Rock Versus the Dakota Access Pipeline and the Long Tradition of Indigenous Resistance. New York: Verso Books.
18.
EstesNDhillonJ (eds) (2009) Standing with Standing Rock: Voices from the #NoDAPL Movement. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2019) Notice of availability of the final environmental impact statement for the proposed Jordan Cove Energy Project. Federal Register84(225): 64315–64317.
20.
FergusonJ (2005) Seeing like an oil company: space, security, and global capital in neoliberal Africa. American Anthropologist107(3): 377–382.
21.
GentryDMarrisE (2018) The next Standing Rock? A pipeline battle looms in Oregon. The New York Times,8 March.
22.
GligorATamasC (2009) Roşia Montană cultural heritage in the context of a new mining development. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai: Geologia54(1): 49–54.
23.
Gómez-BarrisM (2017) The Extractive Zone. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
24.
HabouchaRJofréD (2021) Safeguarding indigenous heritage in the Chilean Atacama Desert: negotiating identity claims and community perceptions of long-term climate change. Heritage and Society14(2–3): 216–241.
25.
HardingJ (2020) The arrestables. The London Review of Books,16 April.
HarrisonR (2018) On heritage ontologies: rethinking the material worlds of heritage. Anthropological Quarterly91(4): 1365–1383.
28.
HarveyDC (2001) Heritage pasts and heritage presents: temporality, meaning and the scope of heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies7(4): 319–338.
29.
HassanFA (2007) The Aswan High Dam and the international rescue Nubia campaign. African Archaeological Review24: 73–94.
30.
Holley-KlineS (2020) Nationalist archaeology and foreign oil exploration in El Tajín, Mexico, 1935–1940. Archaeological Dialogues27(1): 79–93.
31.
HoogeveenD (2018) Sovereign intentions: gold mining law and mineral staking in British Columbia. BC Studies: The British Columbian Quarterly198: 81–101.
32.
Horne (2015) Pacific Northwest LNG Implications: Analysis of Environmental Impacts and the Project Development Agreement. Toronto, ON: Pembina Institute. 10 July. Available athttps://www.pembina.org/pub/pacific-northwest-lng-backgrounder (accessed 20 May 2024).
33.
HorowitzLS (2021) “Conflicts of interests” within and between elite assemblages in the legal production of space: Indigenous cultural heritage preservation and the Dakota Access Pipeline. The Geographical Journal188(1): 91–108.
34.
HowlettCLawrenceR (2019) Accumulating minerals and dispossessing Indigenous Australians: native title recognition as settler‐colonialism. Antipode51(3): 818–837.
35.
JaroszK (2015) Roşia Montană in Romania: Roman gold mines and the power of protests. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage2(1): 57–71.
36.
KeelerJ (ed) (2017) Edge of Morning: Native Voices Speak for the Bears Ears. Salt Lake City, UT: Torrey House Press.
37.
KingTF (2013) Cultural Resource Laws and Practice. Washington, DC: Rowman & Littlefield.
38.
KirschS (2007) Indigenous movements and the risks of counterglobalization: tracking the campaign against Papua New Guinea’s Ok Tedi mine. American Ethnologist34(2): 303–321.
39.
KirschS (2014) Mining Capitalism: The Relationship between Corporations and Their Critics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
40.
KleinitzCNäserC (2011) The loss of innocence: political and ethical dimensions of the Merowe Dam archaeological salvage project at the Fourth Nile Cataract (Sudan). Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites13(2–3): 253–280.
41.
KoesterTKBryanJ (2021) The cartographic dispossession of Bears Ears: confronting settler colonialism in contemporary struggles over “public land”. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space5(4): 2332–2355.
42.
KuyekJ (2019) Unearthing Justice: How to Protect Your Community from the Mining Industry. Toronto: Between the Lines.
43.
LeMenagerS (2014) Living Oil: Petroleum Culture in the American Century. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
LiptonEFriedmanL (2018) Oil was central in decision to shrink Bears Ears Monument, emails show. The New York Times, 18 March.
46.
LoganW (2013) Learning to engage with human rights in heritage. In: AlbertMTBerneckerRRudolffB (eds). Understanding Heritage: Perspectives in Heritage Studies. Berlin and Boston, MA: de Gruyter, 1–35.
47.
LukeC (2019) A Pearl in Peril: Heritage and Diplomacy in Turkey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
MartinJAltmanD (2009) Power, Culture, Economy: Indigenous Australians and Mining. Canberra: ANU Press.
49.
MascoJ (2004) Mutant ecologies: radioactive life in post–cold war New Mexico. Cultural Anthropology19(4): 517–550.
50.
McCormackPA (2016) Environmental reviews and case studies: doing credible cultural assessment: applied social science. Environmental Practice18(3): 148–165.
51.
McInnisJ (2019) Black women’s geographies and the afterlives of the sugar plantation. American Literary History31(4): 741–774.
52.
McKittrickK (2006) Demonic Grounds: Black Women and the Cartographies of Struggle. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
53.
MeskellL (2002) Negative heritage and past mastering in archaeology. Anthropological Quarterly75(3): 557–574.
54.
MobleyCM (1990) The 1989 Exxon Valdez Cultural Resource Program. Anchorage, AK: Exxon Shipping Company and Exxon Company.
55.
NicholasG (2021) Protecting Indigenous heritage objects, places, and values: challenges, responses, and responsibilities. International Journal of Heritage Studies28(3): 400–422.
56.
OsterlundPB (2019) Destroying Istanbul to “restore it.” The Atlantic, 21March.
57.
OwleyJ (2018) Taking the public out of public lands: shifts in coal-extraction policies in the Trump administration. FIU Law Review13(1): 35–63.
58.
O’FaircheallaighC (2010) Public participation and environmental impact assessment: purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environmental Impact Assessment Review30(1): 19–27.
59.
PletsG (2016) Heritage statecraft: when archaeological heritage meets neoliberalism in Gazprom’s resource colonies, Russia. Journal of Field Archaeology41(3): 368–383.
60.
PrestonJ (2017) Racial extractivism and white settler colonialism: an examination of the Canadian tar sands mega-projects. Cultural Studies31(2–3): 353–375.
61.
PriceDH (2016) Cold War Anthropology: The CIA, the Pentagon, and the Growth of Dual Use Anthropology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
62.
Reeder-MyersLA (2015) Cultural heritage at risk in the twenty-first century: a vulnerability assessment of coastal archaeological sites in the United States. Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology10(3): 436–445.
63.
RegerDMcMahanJDHolmesCE (1992) Effect of crude oil contamination on some archaeological sites in the Gulf of Alaska, 1991 investigations, Archaeology study number 1, Exxon Valdez oil spill state/federal natural resource damage assessment final report. Report for the Alaska Department of Natural Resources. Anchorage, AK: Alaska Department of Natural Resources.
64.
RogersD (2015) Oil and anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology44: 365–380.
65.
SalasLM (2016) Crude residues: the workings of failing oil infrastructure in Poza Rica, Veracruz, Mexico. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space48(4): 718–735.
66.
ScottDN (2013) The networked infrastructure of fossil capitalism: implications of the new pipeline debates for environmental justice in Canada. Comparative Research in Law & Political Economy43: 11–67.
67.
SimpsonA (2007) On ethnographic refusal: Indigeneity, “voice” and colonial citizenship. Junctures: The Journal for Thematic Dialogue9: 67–80.
68.
SimpsonM (2019) Resource desiring machines: the production of settler colonial space, violence, and the making of a resource in the Athabasca tar sands. Political Geography74: 102044–102056.
69.
SmithL (2004) Archaeological Theory and the Politics of Cultural Heritage. London: Routledge.
70.
SolnitR (2019) Hope in the Dark: Untold Histories, Wild Possibilities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
71.
StarrF (2013) Corporate Responsibility for Cultural Heritage: Conservation, Sustainable Development, and Corporate Reputation. London and New York: Routledge.
72.
StolerA (2002) Colonial archives and the arts of governance. Archival Science2(1–2): 87–109.
73.
ToddZ (2017) Fish, kin and hope: tending to water violations in Amiskwaciwâskahikan and Treaty Six Territory. Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry43(1): 102–107.
74.
TsingAL (2005) Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
WattsMJ (2021) Space, scale, and the global oil assemblage: commodity frontiers in resource peripheries. In: IrarrázavalFArias-LoyolaM (eds). Resource Peripheries in the Global Economy: Networks, Scales, and Places of Extraction. New York: Springer, 145–182.
77.
WeissLM (2007) Heritage-making and political identity. Journal of Social Archaeology7(3): 413–431.
78.
WeissLM (2017) Informal settlements and urban heritage landscapes in South Africa. In: ConnollyAJ (ed). Cultural Heritage Rights. London: Routledge, 137–160.
79.
WeizmanE (2007) Hollow Land: Israel’s Architecture of Occupation. New York: Verso Press.
80.
WeizmanESheikhF (2015) The Conflict Shoreline: Colonialism as Climate Change. Göttingen: Steidl Verlag.
81.
WhyteKP (2019) The Dakota Access Pipeline, environmental injustice, and US settler colonialism. Red Ink: An International Journal of Indigenous Literature, Arts, & Humanities19(1). Available at:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2925513(accessed 9 February 2024).
82.
WillowAJ (2013) Doing sovereignty in native North America: Anishinaabe counter-mapping and the struggle for land-based self-determination. Human Ecology41: 871–884.
83.
ZalikA (2009) Zones of exclusion: offshore extraction, the contestation of space and physical displacement in the Nigerian Delta and the Mexican Gulf. Antipode41(3): 557–582.
