This paper explores how replicated erotic art decorating terracotta lamps constructed sexual ideology in Roman provinces. Lamp imagery, through semantic combination of elements, generated sexual discourse in which certain bodies and actions visually articulated boundaries of ideal and non-ideal sexualities and associated practices. Mould-made replication helped sexual disc-reliefs communicate consistent ideas about sexuality, aiding cultural cohesion throughout the globalising empire. Lamp portability helped these ideas reach large audiences across vast geographies. Provincial communities, through selection of these objects, however, redefined Roman sexual discourse locally. The greatest difference is discernible between the Latin and Greek locales. In the Latin sites disc-reliefs generate meaning through idealised and dwarf symplegmata, whereas in the Greek East they do so through portrayals of idealised symplegma, mythological rapes, and bestiality. The paper demonstrates the plurality of provincial sexualities, the regional bases for their formation, and their implication in broader Roman colonial discourses.
BaileyDM (1985) Excavations at Sidi Khrebish, Benghazi, Volume III, Part 2: The Lamps. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
2.
BaileyDM (1987) The Roman terracotta lamp industry—Another view about exports. In: OziolTRebuffatR (eds) Les Lampes de terre cuite en Méditerranée. Des origines à Justinien. Table ronde du CNRS, tenue à Lyon du 7 au 11 décembre 1981. Lyon: Maison de l'Orient et de la Méditerranée Jean Pouilloux, pp. 59–63.
3.
BaileyDM (1988) A Catalogue of Lamps in the British Museum, Vol. 3: Roman Provincial Lamps. London: British Museum Press.
4.
BaradK (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. London: Duke University Press.
5.
BarrowRJ (2018) Gender, Identity and the Body in Greek and Roman Sculpture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BielfeldtR (2014) The lure and lore of light: Roman lamps in the Harvard art museums. In: EbbinghausS (ed) Ancient Bronzes Through a Modern Lens: Introductory Essays on the Study of Ancient Mediterranean and Near Eastern Bronzes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 171–205.
7.
BielfeldtR (2018) Candelabrus and Trimalchio: Embodied histories of Roman lampstands and their slaves. Art History41(3): 420–443.
8.
BlondellROrmandK (eds) (2015) Ancient Sex: New Essays. Classical Memories/Modern Identities. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
9.
BookidisNPembertonEG (2015) Corinth XVIII: The Sanctuary of Demeter and Kore: The Greek Lamps and Offering Trays. Princeton, NJ: ASCSA.
10.
BordoS (2004) Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture and the Body. Oakland: University of California Press.
11.
BöttgerB (2002) Die Kaiserzeitlichen Lampen Vom Kerameikos. München: Hirmer Verlag GmbH.
12.
BradleyK (2000) Animalizing the slave: The truth of fiction. Journal of Roman Studies90: 110–125.
13.
BraidottiR (2013) The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
BrendelO (1970) The Scope and Temperament of Erotic Art in the Greco-Roman World. New York: Basic Books.
BruneauP (1965) Illustrations antiques du Coq et de l'Ane de Lucien. Bulletin de Correspondance Hellenique89(2): 349–357.
17.
ButlerJ (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
18.
ButlerJ (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. New York: Routledge.
19.
ClarkeJR (1998) Looking at Lovemaking: Constructions of Sexuality in Roman Art 100BC–AD250. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
ClarkeJR (2007) Looking at Laughter: Humor, Power and Transgression in Roman Visual Culture 100BC–AD250. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
ConnorPJ (1984) The dead hero and the sleeping giant by the Nikosthenes Painter at the beginnings of a motif. Archäologischer Anzeiger99: 387–394.
22.
DavidsonJ (2007) The Greeks and Greek Love: A Radical Reappraisal of Homosexuality in Ancient Greece. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
23.
DeneauveJ (1969) Lampes de Carthage. Paris: CNRS.
24.
EckardtH (2002) Illuminating Roman Britain. Montagnac: Editions Monique Mergoil.
25.
ElsnerJ (1995) Art and the Roman Viewer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
ElsnerJ (2007) Roman Eyes: Visuality and Subjectivity in Art and Text. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
27.
ElsnerJ (ed) (2020) Figurines: Figuration and the Sense of Scale. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
FrecerR (2015) Gerulata: The Lamps. Roman Lamps in a Provincial Context. Prague: Univerzita Karlova v Praze.
29.
GellA (1998) Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
30.
Goethert-PolaschekK (1985) Katalog der römischen Lampen des Rheinischen Landes-museums Trier: bildlampen un Sonderformen. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.
31.
HamilakisY (2014) Archaeology and the Senses: Human Experience, Memory, and Affect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
HarawayD (1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies14(3): 575–599.
33.
HarrisWVV (1980) Roman terracotta lamps: The organization of an industry. The Journal of Roman Studies70: 126–145.
34.
HeimerlA (2001) Die römischen Lampen aus Pergamon Vom Beginn der Kaiserzeit bis zum Ende des 4. Jhs. n. Chr. Pergamenische Forschungen Bd. 13. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter & Co.
35.
HölscherT (1987) Römische Bildsprache als semantisches System. Heidelberg: Winter.
36.
HölscherT (2018) Visual Power in Ancient Greece and Rome: Between Art and Social Reality. Oakland: University of California Press.
37.
Huld-ZetscheI (2014) Die Lampen aus den römischen Töpfereien von Frankfurt am Main-Nied. Regensburg: Schnell et Steiner.
38.
IsaacB (2013) The Invention of Racism in Classical Antiquity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
IvlevaTCollinsR (eds) (2020) Un-Roman Sex: Gender, Sexuality, and Lovemaking in the Roman Provinces and Frontiers. London: Routledge.
40.
JoyceRA (2008) Ancient Bodies, Ancient Lives: Sex, Gender, and Archaeology. New York: Thames & Hudson.
41.
KamenDLevin-RichardsonS (2014) Revisiting Roman sexuality: Agency and the conceptualization of penetrated males. In: MastersonMSorkin RabinowitzNRobsonJ (eds) Sex in Antiquity: Exploring Gender and Sexuality in the Ancient World. London: Routledge, pp. 449–460.
42.
KamenDLevin-RichardsonS (2015) Lusty ladies in the Roman imaginary. In: BlondellROrmandK (eds) Ancient Sex: New Essays. Classical Memories/Modern Identities. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 231–252.
43.
KampenN (1997) Epilogue: Gender and desire. In: Koloski-OstrowAOLyonsCL (eds) Naked Truths: Women, Sexuality, and Gender in Classical Art and Archaeology. London: Routledge, pp. 267–277.
44.
KanellouM (2013) Lamp and erotic epigram: How an object sheds light on the lover’s emotions. In: SandersEThumigerCCareyC, et al. (eds) Erôs in Ancient Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 277–292.
45.
KotrositsM (2018) Penetration and its discontents: Greco-Roman sexuality, the Acts of Paul and Thecla, and theorizing eros without the wound. Journal of the History of Sexuality27(3): 343–366.
46.
KristevaJ (1982) Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.
47.
LeibundgutA (1977) Die römischen Lampen in der Schweiz: Eine kultur und handelsgeschichtliche Studie. Bern: Francke.
48.
Levin-RichardsonS (2013) Fututa sum hic: Female subjectivity and agency in Pompeian sexual graffiti. The Classical Journal108(3): 319–345.
49.
MeskellLMJoyceRA (2003) Embodied Lives: Figuring Ancient Maya and Egyptian Experience. London: Routledge.
50.
MeyboomPGPVersluysMJ (2007) The meaning of dwarfs in Nilotic scenes. In: BricaultLVersluysMJMeyboomPGP (eds) Nile into Tiber: Egypt in the Roman World. Leiden: Brill, 170–208.
51.
MilesMCNorwichJJ (1997) Love in the Ancient World. London: Seven Dials.
52.
MitchellAG (2009) Greek Vase-Painting and the Origins of Visual Humour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
MolE (2015) Egypt in material and mind: the use and perception of aegyptiaca in Roman domestic contexts of Pompeii. PhD Dissertation,Leiden University, The Netherlands.
54.
MoonD (2008) Culture and the sociology of sexuality: It's only natural?The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science619: 183–205.
55.
MorelliA (2009) Roman Britain and Classical Deities: Gender and Sexuality in Roman Art. Oxford: Archaeopress.
56.
OswaldF (1936–7) Index of Figure-Types on Terra Sigillata: Annals of Archaeology and Anthology Supplement. Liverpool: University of Liverpool.
57.
OziolT (1977) Salamine de Chypre VII. Les lampes du Musée de Chypre. Paris: de Boccard.
58.
PerlzweigJ (1961) Athenian Agora VII: Lamps of the Roman Period: First to Seventh Century after Christ. Princeton, NJ: ASCSA.
59.
RichlinA (1992) The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60.
RobsonJE (1997) Bestiality and bestial rape in Greek myth. In: DeacySPierceKF (eds) Rape in Antiquity: Sexual Violence in the Greek and Roman Worlds. London: Duckworth, pp. 65–96.
61.
SchmidtRAVossBL (eds) (2000) Archaeologies of Sexuality. London: Routledge.
62.
SichtermannH (1992) Die mythologischen Sarkophage. Apollon, Ares, Bellerophon, Daidalos, Endymion,Ganymed, Giganten, Grazien. XII: 2. Die antiken Sarkophagreliefs. Berlin: Gebr. Mann.
63.
SlaneKW (1990) Corinth XVIII: The Sanctuary of Demeter and Kore: The Roman Pottery and Lamps. Princeton, NJ: ASCSA.
64.
SquireM (2011) The Art of the Body: Antiquity and its Legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65.
SquireM (2016) Introductory reflections: Making sense of ancient sight. In: SquireM (ed) Sight and the Ancient Senses. London: Routledge, pp. 1–35.
66.
StewartP (2003) Statues in Roman Society: Representation and Response. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
67.
SurteesADyerJ (eds) (2020) Exploring Gender Diversity in the Ancient World. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
68.
TannerJ (2010) Introduction to the new edition: Race and representation in ancient art: Black Athena and after. In: BindmanDGatesHLJ (eds) The Image of the Black in Western Art: Volume I: From the Pharaohs to the Fall of the Roman Empire. New edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 1–39.
69.
ToscanoMM (2013) The eyes have it: Female desire on Attic Greek vases. Arethusa46: 1–40.
70.
TrentinL (2011) Deformity in the Roman imperial court. Greece & Rome58(2): 195–208.
71.
TrentinL (2016) The ‘other’ Romans: Deformed bodies in the visual arts of Rome. In: LaesC (ed) Disability in Antiquity. London: Routledge, pp. 233–247.
72.
VersluysMJ (2002) Aegyptiaca Romana: Nilotic Scenes and the Roman Views of Egypt. Leiden: Brill.
73.
VersluysMJ (2014) Understanding objects in motion: An archaeological dialogue on Romanization. Archaeological Dialogues21(1): 1–20.
74.
VossBL (2015) The Archaeology of Ethnogenesis: Race and Sexuality in Colonial San Francisco. Berkeley: University of California Press.
75.
VossBLCasellaEC (2012) The Archaeology of Colonialism: Intimate Encounters and Sexual Effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76.
VoutC (2013) Sex on Show: Seeing the Erotic in Greece and Rome. London: The British Museum Press.
77.
VuceticS (2014) Roman sexuality or Roman sexualities? Looking at sexual imagery on Roman terracotta mould-made lamps. In: PlattsHBarronCLundockJ, et al. (eds) TRAC 2013: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference. King’s College London 4–6 April 2013. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 140–158.
78.
WestermannWL (1924) The castanet dancers of Arsinoe. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology10(2): 134–144.
79.
WilliamsCA (2010) Roman Homosexuality: Ideologies of Masculinity in Classical Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
80.
WorthingtonI (2021) Athens After Empire: A History from Alexander the Great to the Emperor Hadrian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
81.
ZankerP (1990) The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Shapiro A (Trans). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
82.
ZankerP (2012) Reading images without texts on Roman sarcophagi. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics61/62: 167–177.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
