Interactive 3-dimensional worlds and computer modeling can be used to excite interest in archaeology among indigenous groups such as the Inuit of the North American Arctic and Greenland. Using two case studies – a recently completed exhibition for the Virtual Museum of Canada on Thule Inuit whalebone houses and an interactive virtual world structured around the Siglit-Inuvialuit sod house – we explore how digital replicas might be used in the repatriation of traditional knowledge. This idea is examined through theexperiences of nine Inuit Elders who explored our digital reconstructions of Thule and Siglit-Inuvialuit dwellings in 3D. Discussions with the Elders suggest that the generic sense of ‘presence’ generated by 3D viewing enhanced their feelings of connectedness to their past. This would imply that virtual reality and 3D technology might be useful in establishing new discourses in archaeological interpretation, as well as assisting in the exploration, construction, and maintenance of cultural identities through knowledge repatriation.
Antoniou A and Lepouras G (2009) Meeting visitors’ expectations – the perceived degree of museumness. Csedu 2009: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Vol. 2. Setubal: INSTICC Press, 187–192.
2.
Arnold C, Levy RM, Dawson PC, Lyons N and Oetelaar G (2010) The Inuvialuit House. Available at: http://www.inuvialuitsodhouse.ca.
3.
BairstowJ (2000) Visit Science Museum in Florence, or take a virtual tour from home. Laser Focus World36(10): 172–173.
4.
BangertJBangertC (1995) Pictures on the net – the virtual museum. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications15(3): 22–23.
5.
BellE (2008) Theories of Performance. Los Angeles: SAGE.
6.
BowenJ (2000) The virtual museum. Museum International52(1): 4–7.
7.
BrownD (2007) Te Ahua Hiko: Digital cultural heritage and indigenous objects, people, and environments. In: CameronFKenderdineS (eds) Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage: A Critical Discourse. New York: MIT Press, 77–91.
8.
BrownD (2008) ‘Ko to Ringa Ki Nga Raku a Te Pakeha’ – virtual Yaonga Maori and museums. Visual Resources24(1): 59–75.
9.
CameronF (2007) Beyond the cult of the replicant: Museums and historical digital objects – traditional concerns, new discourses. In: CameronFKenderdineS (eds) Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage: A Critical Discourse. New York: MIT Press, 49–76.
10.
Cao XY, Makino M, Shirai H and Shinoda S (2005) An interactively stereoscopic visual simulation on the CAVE for reliability and security of mobile communications systems. System Simulation and Scientific Computing Vols 1 and 2, Proceedings, 461–465.
11.
Chakrabarty D (2002) Museums in late democracies. Humanities Research IX(1): 5–12.
12.
ChampionEBharatD (2007) Dialing up the past. In: CameronFKenderdineS (eds) Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage: A Critical Discourse. New York: MIT Press, 333–334.
13.
ChimJLauRWHLeongHVSiA (2003) Cyberwalk: A web-based distributed virtual walkthrough environment. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia5(4): 503–515.
14.
DawsonPCLevyRM (2005) Constructing a 3D model of a Thule whalebone house using laser scanning technology. Journal of Field Archaeology30: 443–455.
DawsonPCLevyRMGardnerDWallsM (2007) Simulating the behavior of light inside Arctic dwellings: Implications for assessing the role of vision in task performance. World Archaeology39(1): 17–55.
17.
Dawson PC, Levy RM, Oetelaar G, Arnold C, Lacroix D, Mackay G (2009) Documenting Mackenzie Inuit Architecture Using 3D Laser Scanning. Alaska Journal of Anthropology 7(2): 29–44.
18.
DeshpandeSGeberKTimpsonC (2007) Engaged dialogism in vitual space: An exploration of research strategies for virtual museums. In: CameronFKenderdineS (eds) Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage: A Critical Discourse. New York: MIT Press, 261–277.
19.
EarleG (2006) At the edges of the lens: Photography, graphical constructions and cinematography. In: EvansTLDaleyP (eds) Digital Archaeology: Bridging Method and Theory. London: Routlege, 191–210.
20.
Flynn B (2007a) Digital knowledge as archaeological spatial praxis. Paper presented at the13th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia, Brisbane, Australia.
21.
FlynnB (2007b) The morphology of space in virtual heritage. In: CameronFKenderdineS (eds) Theorizing Digital Heritage: A Critical Discourse. New York: MIT Press, 349–369.
22.
GeroJRootD (1996) Public presentations and private converns: Archaeology in the pages of National Geographic. In: PreucelRHodderI (eds) Contemporary Archaeology in Theory: A Reader. Blackwell: Oxford, 531–548.
23.
Hooper-GreenhillE (2000a) Changing values in the art museum: Rethinking communication and learning. International Journal of Heritage Studies6(1): 9–31.
24.
Hooper-GreenhillE (2000b) Museums and the Interpretation of Visual Culture. London: Routledge.
25.
HoptmanGH (1992) The virtual museum and related epistemological concerns. In: BarrettE (ed.) Sociomedia, Multi Media, Hypermedia and the Social Construction of Knowledge. New York: MIT Press, 141–159.
26.
Hoptman GH, Latimer JP and Weiner M (2000) Virtual objects and real education: AProlegomenon version.1. In: Museums and the Web 2000, Selected Papers from an International Conference. Pittsburgh: Archives and Museum Informatics, 97–102.
27.
Kwon YM, Kim IJ, Ahn SC, Ko H and Kim HG (2001) Virtual heritage system: Modeling, database and presentation. VSMM 2001: Seventh International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia, Proceedings, 137–146.
28.
LevyRMDawsonPC (2009) Using finite element methods to analyze ancient architecture: An example from the North American Arctic. Journal of Archaeological Science36(2): 298–307.
29.
Liu SY and Jia JL (2009) Design and implementation of virtual culture museum. ICCSSE 2009: Proceedings of 2009 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Education, 686–689.
30.
Lombard M and Ditton T (1997) At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer–Mediated Communication 3(2).
31.
LowensteinT (1993) Ancient Land, Sacred Whale. The Inuit Hunt and Its Rituals. London: Bloomsbury.
32.
McCartneyA (1979) A processual consideration of Thule whale bone houses. In: McCartneyA (ed.) Thule Eskimo Culture: An Anthropological Retrospective. Ottawa: National Museum of Man Mercury Series, 301–324.
33.
McCartneyA (1980) The nature of Thule Eskimo whale use. Arctic33(5): 17–41.
34.
ManiaKRobinsonA (2005) An experimental exploration of the relationship between subjective impressions of ilumination and physical fidelity. Computers and Graphics29(1): 49–56.
35.
MathiassenT (1927) Archaeology of the Central Eskimos. Cophenhagen: Glydendalske Boghandel.
36.
MaxwellM (1985) Prehistory of the Eastern Arctic. New York: Academic Press.
37.
MerrimanN (2004) Introduction: Diversity and dissonance in public archaeology. In: MerrimanN (ed.) Public Archaeology. London: Routledge, 1–19.
38.
Mithen S (1991) A cybernetic wasteland? Rationality, emotion and Mesolithic foraging. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 57(2): 9–14.
39.
PanZGChenWZZhangMMLiuJFWuGS (2009) Virtual reality in the digital Olympic museum. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications29(5): 91–95.
40.
PearceSM (1992) Museums, Objects and Collections: A Cultural Study. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
41.
Piquette K (2008) Ancient symbols, archaeological theory, modern media: The potential for qualitative analysis of written evidence with new technologies. Theoretical Archaeology Group 30 Conference, Southhampton.
42.
SadowskiWStanleyK (2002) Presence in virtual environments. In: StanneyKM (ed.) Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 791–806.
43.
ShortJWilliamsEChristieB (1976) The Social Psychology of Telecomunications. London: Wiley.
44.
SlaterM (1999a) A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence-Teleoperators and Virtual Environments6: 603–616.
45.
SlaterM (1999b) Measuring presence: A response to the Witmer and Singer presence questionaire. Presence8(5): 560–565.
46.
Slater M, Perez-Marcos D, Ehrsson HH and Sanchez-Vives MV (2008) Towards a digital body: The virtual arm illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2(6).
47.
Slater M, Spanlang B, Sanchez-Vives MV and Blanke O (2010) First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PloS ONE 5(5): e105674.
48.
Slater M, Steed A, McCarthy J, Maringelli F (1998) The influence of body movement on subjective presence in virtual environments. Human Factors 40(3): 469–477.
49.
SpectorJ (1993) What This Awl Means: Feminist Archaeology at the Wahpeton Dakota Village. Minnesota: Minnesota Historical Society Press.
50.
StanneyKMMourantRRKennedyRS (1998) Human factors issues in virtual environments: A review of the literature. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments7(4): 327–351.
51.
SylaiouSManiaKKaroulisAWhiteM (2009) Exploring the relationship between presence and enjoyment in a virtual museum. International Journal of Computer Studies68: 243–253.
52.
TarlowS (2000) Emotion in archaeology. Current Anthropology41(5): 713–746.
53.
ThomasJ (1993) The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape. In: BenderB (ed.) Landscape: Politics and Perspectives. Oxford: Berg, 15–20.
54.
TilleyC (1994) A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths, and Monuments. Oxford: Berg.
55.
Tuhiwai SmithL (2005) On tricky ground: Researching the native in the age of uncertainty. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
WhitridgeP (2004) Landscapes, houses, bodies, things: ‘Place’ and the archaeology of Inuit imaginaries. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory11(2): 213–250.
58.
WitcombA (2007) The materiality of virtual technologies: A new approach to thinking about the impact of multimedia museums. In: CameronFKenderdineS (eds) Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage: A Critical Discourse. New York: MIT Press, 35–48.
