In this article, we provide an example of what we consider to be a productive archaeological collaboration between a State Agency and a Native American tribe that we believe has both theoretical and methodological implications. Our work implements and extends Hodder’s reflexive method (1999) through the use of inclusivity, reciprocity and mutual respect. We describe how coupling our mutual regard for knowledge of the past with our respect for the spiritual significance of the Kashaya landscape necessarily led to the breaking down of boundaries between the scientific, the sacred and the personal. A 1997 excavation provides a case study of our collaborative process. We conclude by suggesting that the space between the usual oppositions of secular and sacred, science and religion, explanation and understanding, holds promise for Native Americans and archaeologists to participate with each other in non-dichotomous and mutually beneficial ways.
Anyon, R.
, T.J. Ferguson, L. Jackson and L. Lane (2000) ‘Native American Oral Traditions and Archaeology’, in K.E. Dongoske, M. Aldenderfer and K. Doehner (eds) Working Together: Native Americans and Archaeologists. Washington DC: Society for American Archaeology.
2.
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
(2001) Protection of Historic Properties 36 CFR, Part 800. Washington DC.
3.
Barrett, S.A.
(1952) ‘Material Aspects of Pomo Culture’, Bulletin of the Public Museum of the City of Milwaukee20(1-2).
4.
Bean, L.J.
(1968) ‘Fieldnotes on the Southwestern Pomo’. Manuscript in possession of L.J. Bean.
5.
Bean, L.J.
and D. Theadoratus (1978) ‘Western Pomo and Northeastern Pomo’, in R.F. Heizer (ed.) Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California, pp. 289-305. Washington DC: Smithsonian.
6.
Bean, L.J.
and S.B. Vane (1978) ‘Cults and Their Transformations’, in R.F. Heizer (ed.) Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California, pp. 662-672. Washington DC: Smithsonian.
7.
Blackburn, T.C.
and L.J. Bean (1978) ‘Kitanemuk’, in R.F. Heizer (ed.) Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California, pp. 564-569. Washington DC: Smithsonian.
8.
Bramlette, A.G.
(1990) ‘A Cultural Resource Study for a Burn Management Plan at Salt Point State Park, Sonoma, California’. Submitted to the California Department of Parks and Recreation, Regional Office, Sonoma, California. On file at the Northwest Information Center of the California Historic Resource Information System, Rohnert Park, California.
9.
Bright, W.
(1978) ‘Karok’, in R.F. Heizer (ed.) Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California, pp. 180-189. Washington DC: Smithsonian.
10.
Buckley, T.
(1982) ‘Menstruation and the Power of Yurok Women: Methods in Cultural Reconstruction’, American Ethnologist9(1): 47-60.
11.
Caltrans Environmental Handbook, Vol. 2 (1991) Sacramento, CA: California Department of Transportation.
12.
Cohen, J.
and N. Swidler (2000) ‘Painting a “New” Face on CRM: Integrating Traditional Culture and Archaeology’, in K.E. Dongoske, M. Aldenderfer and K. Doehner (eds) Working Together: Native Americans and Archaeologists, pp. 37-43. Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology.
13.
Dongoske, K.E.
, M. Aldenderfer and K. Doehner, eds. (2000) Working Together: Native Americans and Archaeologists. Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology.
14.
Dowdall, K.M.
(1988) ‘An Archaeological Collections Analysis of Excavated Materials from CA-SON-473’. Submitted to the California Department of Parks and Recreation, Regional Office, Sonoma, California. On file at the Northwest Information Center of the California Historic Resource Information System, Rohnert Park, California.
15.
Dowdall, K.M.
(1993) ‘Archaeological Survey Report for Proposed Turnout Locations on State Highway 1, Sonoma County, California, 04-SON-1 PM 2.28/57.42 EA 173500’. Submitted to Caltrans District 4, Oakland, California. On file at the Northwest Information Center of the California Historic Resource Information System, Rohnert Park, California.
16.
Dowdall, K.M. (1995) Temporal Contrasts in Archaeological Site Usage on the Northern Sonoma Coast, Master’s Thesis, Sonoma State University: Coyote Press.
17.
Dowdall, K.M.
(1997) ‘Treatment Plan for an Archaeological Investigation at CA SON-1661 on the Sonoma Coast’. Route 4-SON-1, PM 40.74, EA 210201. Submitted to Caltrans District 4, Oakland, California. On file at the Northwest Information Center of the California Historic Resource Information System, Rohnert Park, California.
18.
Dowdall, K.M.
and O. Parrish (2001) ‘A Collaborative Approach to Archaeology on the Sonoma Coast’, paper presented at the 66th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans, Louisiana. Ian Hodder and Monika Bolino, Chairpersons. Manuscript in possession of authors.
19.
Dowdall, K.M.
, V. Parrish Chappell, V. Parrish Wilder and N.B. Thompson (in press) ‘Archaeology and Kashaya Pomo History of Salt Point State Park. Fort Ross Global Village Project, Department of Parks and Recreation, California’. Manuscript in possession of authors.
20.
Downer, A.S.
(1997) ‘Archaeologists-Native American Relations’, in N. Swidler, K.E. Dongoske, R. Anyon and A. S. Downer (eds) Native Americans and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground, pp. 23-34. Walnut Creek: Altimira Press.
21.
Elsasser, A.B.
(1978) ‘Mattole, Nongatl, Sinkyone, Lasik and Wailaki’, in R.F. Heizer (ed.) Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California, pp. 190-204. Washington DC: Smithsonian.
22.
Ferguson, T.J.
, K.E. Dongoske, M. Yeatts and L.J. Kuwanwisiwma (2000) ‘Hopi Oral History and Archaeology’, in K.E. Dongoske, M. Aldenderfer and K. Doehner (eds) Working Together: Native Americans and Archaeologists, pp. 45-60. Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology.
23.
Goldschmidt, W.
(1978) ‘Nomlaki’, in R.F. Heizer (ed.) Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California, pp. 341-349. Washington DC: Smithsonian.
24.
Goodrich, J.L.
(1974) A Kashaya Pomo Folk Taxonomy, Kashaya Pomo Language in Culture Project, Working Paper Number 5. Ethnographic Laboratory, Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, California.
25.
Goodrich, J.
, C. Lawson and V. Parrish Lawson (1980) Kashaya Pomo Plants. American Indian Monograph Series Number 2. Originally published by the University of California at Los Angeles. Reprinted Berkeley, CA: Heyday Books.
26.
Hodder, I.
(1999) The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
27.
Hodder, I.
(2000) Towards a Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Catalhoyuk. Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs.
28.
Hodder, I. (2002) An Interview with Ian Hodder, by E. Breck Parkman and C. Kristina Roper, for Society for California Archaeology: www.scanet.org/hodder.html.
29.
Hylkema, M.G. (2002) Interview by K.M. Dowdall. Manuscript in possession of K.M. Dowdall.
30.
Johnson, J.J.
(1978) ‘Yana’, in R.F. Heizer (ed.) Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California, pp. 361-369. Washington DC: Smithsonian.
31.
Kelly, I.T.
(1978) ‘Coast Miwok’, in R.F. Heizer (ed.) Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California, pp. 414-425. Washington DC: Smithsonian.
32.
Kelly, I.T.
(1991) ‘Interviews with Tom Smith and Maria Copa’, in M.E.T. Collier and S.B. Thalman (eds) Mapom Occasional Papers Number 6, p. 497. Miwok Archaeological Preserve of Marin.
33.
Kelly, R.
(2000) ‘Native Americans and Archaeology: A Vital Partnership’, in K.E. Dongoske, M. Aldenderfer and K. Doehner (eds) Working Together: Native Americans and Archaeologists, pp. 97-101. Washington DC: Society for American Archaeology.
34.
Kennedy, M.J. (1955) ‘Culture Contact and Acculturation of the Southwestern Pomo’, PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
35.
Kluth, R.
and K. Munnell (1997) ‘The Integration of Tradition and Scientific Knowledge’, in N. Swidler, K.E. Dongoske, R. Anyon and A.S. Downer (eds) Native Americans and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground, pp. 112-119. Walnut Creek: Altimira Press.
36.
Kniffen, F.
(1939) ‘Pomo Geography’, University of California Publication in American Archaeology and Ethnology36(6): 353-400.
37.
Lapena, F.R.
(1978) ‘Wintu’, in R.F. Heizer (ed.) Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California, pp. 398-413, pp. 324-340. Washington DC: Smithsonian.
38.
Lawson, C.
and V. Parrish Lawson (1976) ‘Kashaya Pomo Ethnological Project’, Journal of California Anthropology3(1): 132-135.
39.
Levy, R.
(1978) ‘Costanoan’, in R.F. Heizer (ed.) Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California. Washington DC: Smithsonian.
40.
Lightfoot, K.G.
, O. Parrish, R. Jewett, et al. (2001) ‘The Mé•ti?ni Village Project: Collaborative Research in the Fort Ross State Historic Park’, Society for California Archaeology Newsletter35(2). Fresno: Society for California Archaeology.
41.
Loeb, E.
(1926) ‘Pomo Folkways’, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology19(2): 149-404. Berkeley: University of California Press.
42.
Loyd, J.
(1997) ‘Prefield conversation’. Transcript of conversation in possession of K.M. Dowdall.
43.
McBride, K.C. (1997) ‘Interview by K.M. Dowdall’. Manuscript in possession of K.M. Dowdall.
44.
McIntosh, R.
, S. Keech McIntosh and T. Togola (1996) ‘People Without History’, in K.D. Vitelli (ed.) Archaeological Ethics, pp. 185-197. Walnut Creek: Altimira Press.
45.
Meighan, C.W.
(1996) ‘Burying American Archaeology’, in K.D. Vitelli (ed.) Archaeological Ethics, pp. 209-213. Walnut Creek: Altimira Press.
46.
National Historic Preservation Act (as amended) (1966) Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. Washington DC.
47.
National Register of Historic Places (1971) On file at the Northwest Information Center of the California Archaeological Inventory, Rohnert Park, California.
48.
Oswalt, R.L.
(1957) ‘Russian Loanwords in Southwestern Pomo’, International Journal of American Linguistics23: 245-247.
49.
Oswalt, R.L.
(1964) ‘Kashaya Texts’, University of California Publications in Linguistics36.
50.
Oswalt, R.L.
(1975) ‘Kahsa.ya Cahno Kalikakh’, Kashaya Pomo Language in Culture Project, Working Paper Number 32. Ethnographic Laboratory, Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, California.
51.
Pauketat, T.
(2000) ‘The Tragedy of the Commoners’, in M.A. Dobres and J. Robb (eds) Agency in Archaeology, pp. 113-129. London: Routledge.
52.
Parrish, E.
(1970) ‘Interview with William E. Pritchard’, in Eugene E. Morris (ed.) Salt Point State Park Project Report. Cooperative Planning for Educational Use of Salt Point State Park, Piner-Olivet Union School District, Howard R. Lloyd, Superintendent.
53.
Parrish, O.
(1976) ‘Khela: A Father’s View’, Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology312: 75-78. Morango Indian Reservation, Banning, California: Malki Museum, Inc.
54.
Parrish, O.
(1996) ‘Kashaya Pomo Cultural Properties’. On file at Caltrans District 4, Oakland, California.
55.
Parrish, O.
(1997) ‘Rituals: A Case in Resource Management’, paper presented in University of California at Berkeley graduate seminar. Manuscript in possession of author.
56.
Parrish, O.
, D. Murley, R. Jewett and K. Lightfoot (2000) ‘The Science of Archaeology and the Response from within Native California: The Archaeology and Ethnohistory of Mé•ti?ni Village in the Fort Ross State Historic Park’, Society for California Archaeology Proceedings13: 84-87. Fresno: Society for California Archaeology.
57.
Parrish Chappell, V. (1997) ‘Interview by K.M. Dowdall’. Manuscript in possession of K.M. Dowdall.
58.
Parrish Chappell, V. (2000) ‘Interview by K.M. Dowdall’. Manuscript in possession of K.M. Dowdall.
59.
Parrish Chappell, V.
(2001) From an interview with Julia Marufo, circa 1965. Manuscript in possession of V. Parrish Chappell.
60.
Peri, D.W.
(1987) ‘On Justice’. A Personal Reminiscence as told by Essie Pinola Parrish. Ridge ReviewVI(3): 52-54.
61.
Peri, D.W., R. Wharton, D. Stern and L. Bean (1964) Unpublished research notes about the history of the Northwest Sonoma Coast. Manuscript in possession of the estate of David W. Peri.
62.
Pritchard, W.E.
(1970) ‘Archaeology of Salt Point’, in Eugene Morris (Project Director) Cooperative Planning for Educational Use of Salt Point State Park, pp. 22-33. Piner-Olivet School District, Santa Rosa, California.
63.
Preucel, R.W.
(1998) The Kotyiti Research Project: Report of the 1996 Fieldseason. Report submitted to the Pueblo de Cochiti and the USDA Forest Service, Southwestern District, Santa Fe.
64.
Preucel, R.W.
(2000) ‘Living on the Mesa: Hanat Kotyiti, a Post-revolt Cochiti Community in the Northern Rio Grande’, Expedition42: 8-17.
65.
Pritchard, W.E.
(1969) ‘National Register Nomination for the Salt Point Archaeological District’. On file at the Northwest Information Center of the California Archaeological Inventory, Rohnert Park, California.
66.
Sawyer, J.O.
(1978) ‘Wappo’, in R.F. Heizer (ed.) Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California, pp. 256-273. Washington DC: Smithsonian.
67.
Shackel, P.
(2000) ‘Craft to Wage Labor: Agency and Resistance in American Historical Archaeology’, in M.A. Dobres and J. Robb (eds) Agency in Archaeology, pp. 232-246. London: Routledge.
68.
Shanks, M.
and C. Tilley (1987) Re-constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69.
Silver, S.K.
(1978) ‘Chimariko’, in R.F. Heizer (ed.) Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California, pp. 205-210. Washington DC: Smithsonian.
70.
Snead, J.E.
and R.W. Preucel (1999) ‘The Ideology of Settlement: Ancestral Keres Landscapes in the Northern Rio Grande’, in W. Ashmore and A.B. Knapp (eds) Archaeologies of Landscape, Contemporary Perspectives, pp. 169-197. Oxford: Blackwell.
71.
Spier, R.F.G.
(1978) ‘Monache’, in R.F. Heizer (ed.) Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California, pp. 426-436. Washington DC: Smithsonian.
72.
Swidler, N.
, K.E. Dongoske, R. Anyon and A.S. Downer, eds (1997) Native Americans and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground. Walnut Creek: Altimira Press.
73.
Thomas, D.H.
(2000) Skull Wars: Kennewick Man, Archaeology and the Battle for Native American Identity. New York: Basic Books.
74.
Thomas, J.
(2001) ‘Archaeologies of Place and Landscape’, in I. Hodder (ed.) Archaeological Theory Today, pp. 165-186. Cambridge: Polity Press.
75.
Wallace, E.
(1978) ‘Sexual Status and Role Differences’, in R.F. Heizer (ed.) Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California, pp. 683-689. Washington DC: Smithsonian.
76.
Wallace, W.J.
(1978) ‘Hupa, Chilula and Whilkut’, in R.F. Heizer (ed.) Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California, pp. 164-179. Washington DC: Smithsonian.
77.
Warburton, M.
and P. Duke (1995) ‘Projectile Points as Cultural Symbols: Ethnography and Archaeology’, in P. Duke and M.C. Wilson (eds) Beyond Subsistence and Dating: Plains Archaeology and the Postprocessual Critique, pp. 211-228. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
78.
Weigel, L. (1997) ‘Interview by K.M. Dowdall’. Manuscript in possession of K.M.Dowdall.
79.
White Deer, G.
(1997) ‘Return of the Sacred: Spirituality and the Scientific Imperative’, in N. Swidler, K.E. Dongoske, R. Anyon and A.S. Downer (eds) Native Americans and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground, pp. 37-43. Walnut Creek: Altimira Press.
80.
Wilson, N.L.
and A.H. Towne (1978) ‘Nisenan’, in R.F. Heizer (ed.) Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California, pp. 387-397. Washington DC: Smithsonian.
81.
Wylie, A.
(2000) ‘Foreword’, in K.E. Dongoske, M. Aldenderfer andK. Doehner (eds) Working Together: Native Americans and Archaeologists, pp. v-ix. Washington DC: Society for American Archaeology.
82.
Zimmerman, L.J.
(1996) ‘Sharing Control of the Past’, in K.D. Vitelli (ed.) Archaeological Ethics, pp. 214-220. Walnut Creek: Altimira Press.
83.
Zimmerman, L.J.
(1997) ‘Remythologizing the Relationship Between Indians and Archaeologists’, in N. Swidler, K.E. Dongoske, R. Anyon and A.S. Downer (eds) Native Americans and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground, pp. 44-56. Walnut Creek: Altimira Press.
