Burial ritual is an area of human behavior that at first seems particularly resistant to the identification of purposeful and intentional action in the archaeological past, at least when viewed from the perspective of the deceased individual. In the context of the European Iron Age this is partly because burial ritual falls so clearly into an area of group expression that is explicitly public and apparently conservative, but also because the actual focus of the activity generally is not in a position to influence the form of their own disposal. In fact, of course, it is possible to speak of agency in burial ritual from the perspective of both the deceased and the survivors involved in the mortuary performance itself. The question is to what extent and under what conditions individual action will be expressed in an archaeologically recognizable way.
Arnold, B. (1988) ‘Slavery in Late Prehistoric Europe: Recovering the Evidence for Social Structure in Iron Age Society’, in M.N. Geselowitz and D.B. Gibson (eds) Tribe and Polity in Late Prehistoric Europe: Demography, Production and Exchange in the Evolution of Complex Social Systems, pp. 179-192. New York: Plenum.
2.
Arnold, B. (1991a) ‘The Material Culture of Social Structure: Rank and Status in Early Iron Age Europe’. PhD dissertation, Harvard University, MA.
3.
Arnold, B. (1991b) ‘The Deposed Princess of Vix: The Need for an Engendered European Prehistory’, in D. Walde and N. Willows (eds) The Archaeology of Gender. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Chacmool Conference, pp. 366-374. Calgary: Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary.
4.
Arnold, B. (1996) ‘Honorary Males or Women of Substance? Gender, Rank and Status in Early Iron Age Europe’, Journal of European Archaeology3(2): 153-168.
5.
Arnold, B. (1999) ‘Drinking the Feast: Alcohol and the Legitimation of Power in Celtic Europe’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal9(1): 71-93.
6.
Arnold, B. (forthcoming) ‘A Landscape of Ancestors: The Space and Place of Death in Iron Age West-central Europe’, in H. Silverman and D. Small (eds) The Space and Place of Death, Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.
7.
Berger, J. (1991) ‘The Linguistification of the Sacred and the Delinguistification of the Economy’, in A. Honneth and H. Joas (eds) Communicative Action: Essays on Jürgen Habermas’ The Theory of Communicative Action, pp. 165-180. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8.
Berggren, K. (2000) ‘The Knowledge-able Agent? On the Paradoxes of Power’, in C. Holtorf and H. Karlsson (eds) Philosophy and Archaeological Practice: Perspectives for the 21st Century, pp. 39-52. Lindome: Bricoleur Press.
9.
Biel, J. (1982) ‘Der Hohenasperg und seine Gräber’, in F. Fischer (ed.) Frühkeltische Fürstengräber in Mitteleuropa, Antike Welt: Zeitschrift für Archäologie und Kulturgeschichte, 13: 38-43. Feldmeilen: Raggi-Verlag.
10.
Bloch, M. and J. Parry (1982) Death and the Regeneration of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
13.
Bradley, R. (1990) The Passage of Arms: An Archaeological Analysis of Prehistoric Hoards and Votive Deposits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Brun, P. and B. Chaume (1997) ‘Introduction: une approche multiscalaire’, in P. Brun and B. Chaume (eds) Vix et les éphémères principautés celtiques: les Vie-Ve siècles avant J.-C. en Europe centre-occidentale, pp. 9-12. Paris: Éditions Errance.
15.
Burmeister, S. (2000) Geschlecht, Alter und Herrschaft in der Späthallstattzeit Württembergs. Tübinger Schriften zur Urund Frühgeschichtlichen Archäologie Vol. 4. Münster: Waxmann.
16.
Cannon, A. (1989) ‘The Historical Dimension in Mortuary Expressions of Status and Sentiment’, Current Anthropology30: 437-458.
17.
Chapman, J. (2000) ‘Tension at Funerals: Social Practices and the Subversion of Community Structure in Later Hungarian Prehistory’, in M.-A. Dobres and J. Robb (eds) Agency in Archaeology, pp. 169-195. London: Routledge.
18.
Dietler, M. (1989) ‘Greeks, Etruscans and Thirsty Barbarians: Early Iron Age Interaction in the Rhône Basin of France’, in T. Champion (ed.) Centre and Periphery: Comparative Studies in Archaeology, pp. 127-141. London: Unwin Hyman.
19.
Dietler, M. (1990) ‘Driven by Drink: The Role of Drinking in the Political Economy and the Case of Early Iron Age France’, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology9(4): 352-406.
20.
Douglas, M. (1966) Purity and Danger. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
21.
Dux, G. (1991) ‘Communicative Reason and Interest: On the Reconstruction of the Normative Order in Societies Structured by Egalitarianism or Domination’, in A. Honneth and H. Joas (eds) Communicative Action: Essays on Jürgen Habermas’ The Theory of Communicative Action, pp. 74-96. Oxford: Blackwell.
22.
Eggert, M. (1989) ‘Die “Fürstensitze” der Späthallstattzeit: Bemerkungen zu einem archäologischen Konstrukt’, Hammaburg NF 9: 53-66.
23.
Giddens, A. (1976) New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Hutchinson & Co.
24.
Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action, trans. T. McCarthy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
25.
Helms, M. (1993) Craft and the Kingly Ideal: Art, Trade and Power. Austin: University of Texas Press.
26.
James, S. (1999) The Atlantic Celts: Ancient People or Modern Invention?Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
27.
Lemonnier, P. (1993) ‘Introduction’, in P. Lemonnier (ed.) Technological Choices: Transformation in Material Cultures since the Neolithic, pp. 1-35. London: Routledge.
28.
Margolis, J. (1996) ‘Intentionality, Institutions and Human Nature’, The Monist69: 546-567.
29.
Miller, D. (1982) ‘Structures and Strategies: An Aspect of the Relationship between Social Hierarchy and Cultural Change’, in I. Hodder (ed.) Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, pp. 89-98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Mizoguchi, K. (1993) ‘Time in the Reproduction of Mortuary Practices’, World Archaeology25(2): 223-235.
31.
Morris, I. (1987) Burial and Ancient Society: The Rise of the Greek City-State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Morris, I. (1992) Death, Ritual and Social Structure in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Oeftiger, C. (1984) Mehrfachbestattungen im Westhallstattkreis: Zum Problem der Totenfolge. Antiquitas 3(26). Bonn: Rudolf Habelt Verlag.
34.
Olivier, L. (1999) ‘The Hochdorf “Princely” Grave and the Question of the Nature of Archaeological Funerary Assemblages’, in T. Murray (ed.) Time and Archaeology, pp. 109-138. London: Routledge.
35.
Pader, E.J. (1982) Symbolism, Social Relations and the Interpretation of Mortuary Remains. British Archaeological Reports British Series Vol. 82. Oxford: BAR.
36.
Pare, C. (1991) ‘Fürstensitze, Celts and the Mediterranean World: Developments in the West Hallstatt Culture in the 6th and 5th Centuries BC’, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 57: 183-202.
37.
Pare, C. (1992) Wagons and Wagon-Graves of the Early Iron Age in Central Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology, Monograph 35.
38.
Parker Pearson, M. (1982) ‘Mortuary Practices, Society and Ideology: An Ethnoarchaeological Study’, in I. Hodder (ed.) Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, pp. 99-113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Parker Pearson, M. (2000) The Archaeology of Death and Burial. Texas A&M Anthropology Series No. 3. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
40.
Pauketat, T. (2000) ‘The Tragedy of the Commoners’, in M.-A. Dobres and J. Robb (eds) Agency in Archaeology, pp. 113-29. London: Routledge.
41.
Pauli, L. (1985) Keltischer Volksglaube: Amulette und Sonderbestattungen am Dürrnberg bei Hallein und im eisenzeitlichen Mitteleuropa. München: C.H. Beck.
42.
Reim, H. (1988) ‘Das keltische Gräberfeld bei Rottenburg am Neckar: Grabungen 1984-1987’, Archäologische Informationen aus Baden-Württemberg 3. Stuttgart: Landesamt für Denkmalpflege.
43.
Reim, H. (1989) ‘Die keltische Nekropole im “Lindele” bei Rottenburg a.N., Kreis Tübingen’, Archäologische Ausgrabungen in Baden-Württemberg 1989, 109-12.
44.
Reim, H. (1995) ‘Zum Abschluss der archäologischen Ausgrabungen in der keltischen Nekropole im “Lindele” in Rottenburg a. N., Kreis Tübingen’, Archäologische Ausgrabungen in Baden-Württemberg 1995, 90-6.
45.
Schutz, A. (1967) The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, WY: Northwestern University Press.
46.
Van Der Leeuw, S. (1993) ‘Giving the Potter a Choice: Conceptual Aspects of Pottery Techniques’, in P. Lemonnier (ed.) Technological Choices, pp. 238-288. London: Routledge.
47.
Veit, U. (1988) ‘Des Fürsten neue Schuhe - Überlegungen zum Befund von Hochdorf’, Germania 66: 162-69.
48.
Wells, P. (1980) Culture Contact and Culture Change: Early Iron Age Central Europe and the Mediterranean World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Williams, M. (1994) ‘Private States and Public Practices: Wittgenstein and Schutz on Intentionality’, International Philosophical QuarterlyXXXIV (1)/133: 89-110.
