Consumer research has conventionally considered people displaying class via readymade products and experiences acquired in the market. By contrast, this study focuses on a route to express class that counterposes the reliance on readymade market offerings as status markers. In this alternative route, termed “conspicuous prosumption,” individuals leisurely engage in slow-paced manual labor to make aesthetically appealing objects and display their creations. The conceptualization of conspicuous prosumption is based on a multi-year ethnography of fiber crafts, a leisure domain where many people combine skilled labor, numerous supplies, and discerning tastes to create material goods. The findings reveal that individuals engaged in conspicuous prosumption: 1) cast their materially productive leisure as both pleasurable and morally superior to pastimes tied to mass consumption, and 2) devise various practices to showcase their handmade creations in domestic and public settings, seeking recognition for their creativity while promoting a broader critique to consumerism. This study provides new insights into expressions of class, the cultural reevaluation of manual labor, and the interplay between leisure and morality in consumer society.
AdamsonG (2010) The Craft Reader. Oxford: Bloomsbury Academic.
2.
AndrewsDRitzerG (2018) Sport and prosumption. Journal of Consumer Culture18(2): 356–373.
3.
ArselZThompsonC (2011) Demythologizing consumption practices: how consumers protect their field-dependent identity investments from devaluing marketplace myths. Journal of Consumer Research37(5): 791–806.
4.
AyUKayganH (2021) Autonomy or loyalty? Community-within-Community interactions of a local football fandom group. Journal of Consumer Culture22(2): 437–455.
5.
BeckerH (1978) Arts and crafts. American Journal of Sociology83(4): 862–889.
6.
BeckerH (1998) Tricks of the Trade. Chicago: University of Chicago.
7.
BellezzaS (2022) Distance and alternative signals of status: a unifying framework. Journal of Consumer Research50(2): 322–342.
8.
BernthalMCrockettDRoseR (2005) Credit cards as lifestyle facilitators. Journal of Consumer Research32(1): 130–145.
BourdieuP (1990) Photography: A Middle-Brow Art. Stanford: Stanford University.
11.
BourdieuP (2005) The Social Structures of the Economy. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
12.
CampbellC (1987) The Romantic Ethic and the Spirit of Modern Consumerism. Blackwell: Great Britain.
13.
CampbellC (1995) Conspicuous confusion? A critique of Veblen’s theory of conspicuous consumption. Sociological Theory13(1): 37–47.
14.
CampbellC (2005) The craft consumer: culture, craft and consumption in a postmodern society. Journal of Consumer Culture5(1): 23–42.
15.
CarfagnaLDuboisEFitzmauriceC, et al. (2014) An emerging eco-habitus: the reconfiguration of high cultural capital practices among ethical consumers. Journal of Consumer Culture14(2): 158–178.
16.
CrockettD (2017) Paths to respectability: consumption and stigma management in the contemporary black middle class. Journal of Consumer Research44(3): 554–581.
17.
Currid-HalkettE (2017) The Sum of Small Things: A Theory of the Aspirational Class. Princeton: Princeton University.
18.
Dolbec, Pierre-Yann, and Andre F. Maciel. “In or Out? How Consumer Performances Lead to the Emergence of New Tastes.” InTaste, Consumption and Markets, pp. 95–114.
19.
EmersonR (2011) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago.
20.
FeatherstoneM (2007) Consumer Culture and Postmodernism. Los Angeles: Sage.
21.
FieldsC (2014) Not your Grandma’s knitting: the role of identity processes in the transformation of cultural practices. Social Psychology Quarterly77(2): 150–165.
22.
FrankeNSchreierMKaiserU (2010) The “I designed it myself” effect in mass customization. Management Science56: 125–140.
23.
GeertzC (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books.
24.
GelberS (1999) Hobbies. New York: Columbia University.
25.
GrantAHandelmanJ (2023) Dysplacement and the professionalization of the home. Journal of Consumer Research49(5): 882–903.
26.
HatchM (2017) The Maker Revolution. John Wiley & Sons.
27.
HoltD (1998) Does cultural capital structure American consumption?Journal of Consumer Research25(1): 1–25.
28.
IhdeDMalafourisL (2019) Homo faber revisited: postphenomenology and material engagement theory. Philosophy & Technology32: 195–214.
29.
JärvinenMHoumanCLarsenA (2013) Drinking successfully: alcohol consumption, taste and social status. Journal of Consumer Culture14(3): 384–405.
30.
KhanS (2011) Privilege: The Making of an Adolescent Elite at St. Paul's School. Princeton: Princeton University.
31.
KozinetsR (2001) Utopian enterprise: articulating the meanings of star trek’s culture of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research28(1): 67–88.
32.
KozinetsR (2002a) Can consumers escape the market? Emancipatory illuminations from burning man. Journal of Consumer Research29(1): 20–38.
33.
KozinetsR (2002b) The field behind the screen: using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research39(1): 61–72.
34.
LamontM (1992) Money, Morals and Manners: The Culture of the French and American Upper-Middle Class. University of Chicago.
35.
LamontM (2000) The Dignity of Working Men. New York: Sage.
36.
LizardoO (2008) The question of culture consumption and stratification revisited. Sociologica2(2): 1.
37.
LizardoO (2016) Why “cultural matters” matter: culture talk as the mobilization of cultural capital in interaction. Poetics58: 1–17.
38.
LuryC (1996) Consumer Culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
39.
MacielAFWallendorfM. (2012) Leisure consumption as conspicuous work. NA-Advances in consumer research 40.
40.
MacielAFWallendorfM (2017) Taste engineering: an extended consumer model of cultural competence constitution. Journal of Consumer Research43(5): 726–746.
41.
MacielAFWallendorfM (2021) Space as a resource in the politics of consumer identity. Journal of Consumer Research48(2): 309–332.
42.
McCrackenG (1988) The Long Interview. Newbury Park: Sage.
43.
MoisioRArnouldEGentryJ (2013) Productive consumption in the class-mediated construction of domestic masculinity. Journal of Consumer Research40(2): 298–316.
44.
MorrisW (1888/2010) The revival of handicraft. In: AdamsonG (ed) The Craft Reader. New York: Berg, 146-155.
45.
OcejoR (2017) Masters of Craft. Princeton: Princeton University.
46.
PetersonRKernR (1996) Changing highbrow taste: from snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review61(5): 900–907.
47.
PomièsAArselZ (2023) Market work and the formation of the omnivorous consumer subject. Journal of Consumer Research50(1): 70–92.
48.
PrieurASavageM (2013) Emerging forms of cultural capital. European Societies15(2): 246–267.
49.
RadwayJ (1984) Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
50.
RamosV (2023) Food consumption, social class and taste in contemporary Portugal. Journal of Consumer Culture23(4): 903–925.
SaatciogluBOzanneJ (2013) Moral habitus and status negotiation in a marginalized working-class neighborhood. Journal of Consumer Research40(4): 692–710.
53.
SahlinsM (1976) Culture and Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago.
54.
SassatelliRDavolioF (2010) Consumption, pleasure and politics slow food and the politico-aesthetic problematization of food. Journal of Consumer Culture10(2): 202–232.
55.
SchauHGillyM (2003) We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space. Journal of Consumer Research30(3): 385–404.
56.
SchorJ (1992) The Overworked American. New York: Basic.
57.
SennettR (1997) The new capitalism. Social Research64(2): 161–180.
58.
SennettR (2008) The Craftsman. London: Yale University.
59.
SmallMCalarcoJ (2022) Qualitative Literacy. Oakland, CA: University of California.
60.
SoperKRyleMThomasL (2009) The Politics and Pleasures of Consuming Differently. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
61.
StebbinsR (2006) Serious Leisure. New Brunswick: Transaction.
62.
TimmermansSTavoryI (2022) Data Analysis in Qualitative Research. Chicago: University of Chicago.
