Uniqlo has recently been challenging the paradigm behind the phenomenal success of Zara: while Zara has been all about fashion, Uniqlo claims to be all about functionality. Here I examine this corporate narrative within the context of a new paradigm in cultural sociology that brings to the fore the material and functional aspects of clothing consumption (as opposed to its fashion and identity-related aspects). This case study shows that we might be able to understand the contemporary consumer better, if we study the corporate narratives of our most popular retailers of fashion. After all, their survival depends upon a correct understanding of how exactly today’s consumers behave.
ArnouldEJThompsonCJ (2005) Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research31: 868–882.
2.
ArulpragasamJFGoleetTMAtincV, et al. (2004) Trade in sectors important to the poor: Rice in Cambodia and Vietnam and cashmere in Mongolia. In: KrummKLKharasHJ (eds) East Asia Integrates: A Trade Policy Agenda for Shared Growth, Washington D.C: World Bank and Oxford University Press, pp. 149–170.
3.
BaumanZ (1995) Life in Fragments: Essays in Postmodern Morality, Oxford: Blackwell.
Chu J (2012) Cheap, chic, and made for all: How Uniqlo plans to take over casual fashion. Available at: www.fastcompany.com.
7.
CraneD (2000) Fashion and Its Social Agendas: Class, Gender, and Identity in Clothing, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
DijksterhuisASmithPKvan BaarenRB, et al. (2005) The unconscious consumer: Effects of environment on consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology15(3): 193–202.
9.
Ferdows K (2003) New world manufacturing order. Industrial Engineer, February, 35(2): 28–33.
HalkierBKatz-GerroTMartensL (2011) Applying practice theory to the study of consumption: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Journal of Consumer Culture11(1): 3–13.
14.
HoltDB (2002) Why do brands cause trouble? A dialectical theory of consumer culture and branding. Journal of Consumer Research29: 70–90.
TokatliN (2008) Global sourcing: Insights from the global clothing industry – The case of Zara, a fast fashion retailer. Journal of Economic Geography8: 21–38.
24.
TokatliN (2015) Single-firm case studies in economic geography: Some methodological reflections on the case of Zara. Journal of Economic Geography15: 631–647.
25.
TungateM (2005) Fashion Brands: Branding Styles from Armani to Zara, London; Sterling, VA: Kogan Page.
van der LaanEVelthuisO (2016) Inconspicuous dressing: A critique of the constriction-through-consumption paradigm in the sociology of clothing. Journal of Consumer Culture16(1): 22–42.
28.
WardeA (1994) Consumption, identity-formation and uncertainty. Sociology28(4): 877–898.
29.
WardeA (2005) Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture5(2): 131–153.
30.
WilskaT-A (2002) Me – A consumer? Consumption, identities and lifestyles in today’s Finland. Acta Sociologica45(3): 195–210.
