Food consumption has become the subject of many prescriptions that aim to improve consumers’ health and protect the environment. This study examined recent changes in food practices that occurred in response to prescriptions. Based on practice theories, we assume that links that connect practices with prescriptions result from evolving social interactions. Consistent with the life-course perspective, we focus on distinctions between public prescriptions and standards that individuals consider relevant to their lives. We rely on quantitative data and the results of qualitative fieldwork conducted in France. Our results suggest that consumers may change food practices when they reach turning points in their lives. They may reconsider resources, skills and standards. Middle- and upper-class individuals are more likely to adopt standards consistent with public prescriptions. Possible explanations are that they trust expert knowledge sources, their social networks are less stable and smaller gaps exist between their standards and prescriptions.
BisogniCAJastranMShenL (2005) A biographical study of food choice capacity: Standards, circumstances, and food management skills. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior37(6): 284–291.
2.
BoltanskiL (1971) Les usages sociaux du corps. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales26(1): 205–233.
3.
BoltanskiLThévenotL (1991) De la Justification: Les Economies de la Grandeur, Paris: Gallimard.
4.
BourdieuP (1972) Esquisse d'une Théorie de la Pratique. Précédé de Trois Etudes d'Ethnologie Kabyle, Paris: Droz.
5.
BourdieuP (1979) La Distinction: Critique Sociale du Jugement, Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
6.
BoveCFSobalJ (2006) Foodwork in newly married couples. Food, Culture & Society9(1): 69–89.
7.
BuggeABAlmasR (2006) Domestic dinner: Representations and practices of a proper meal among young suburban mothers. Journal of Consumer Culture6(2): 203–228.
8.
CardonPGojardS (2009) Les personnes âgées face à la dépendance culinaire: Entre délégation et remplacement. Retraite et Société. (56169–193.
9.
ChenuAHerpinN (2002) Une pause dans la marche vers la civilisation des loisirs?Économie et Statistique. (352–35315–37.
10.
De Saint Pol T (2008) La consommation alimentaire des hommes et femmes vivant seuls. INSEE Première (1194): 1–4.
11.
DevineCMConnorsMBisogniCA (1998) Life-course influences on fruit and vegetable trajectories: Qualitative analysis of food choices. Journal of Nutrition Education30(6): 361–370.
12.
DonkinAJMJohnsonAELilleyJM (1998) Gender and living alone as determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among the elderly living at home in urban Nottingham. Appetite30(1): 39–51.
13.
DouglasM (1972) Deciphering a meal. Daedalus101(1): 61–81.
14.
Dubuisson-QuellierS (2013a) From qualities to value. Demand shaping and market control in mass market. In: BeckertJMusselinC (eds) Constructing Quality: The Classification of Goods in the Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 247–267.
15.
Dubuisson-QuellierS (2013b) A market mediation strategy: How social movements seek to change firms' practices by promoting new principles of product valuation. Organization Studies34(5–6): 683–703.
16.
EvansDSouthertonDMcMeekinA (2012) Sustainable consumption, behaviour change policies and theories of practice. In: WardeASouthertonD (eds) The Habits of Consumption, Helsinki: Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, pp. 113–129.
GojardS (2000) L'alimentation dans la prime enfance Diffusion et réception des normes de puériculture. Revue Française de Sociologie41(3): 475–512.
19.
GuillouAGuilbertP (1989) Le froid domestiqué: L’usage du congélateur. Terrain. (127–14.
20.
HalbwachsM (1913) La Classe Ouvrière et les Niveaux de Vie: Recherches sur la Hiérarchie des Besoins dans les Sociétés Industrielles Contemporaines, Paris: Alcan.
21.
Halkier B (2009a) A practice theoretical perspective on everyday dealings with environmental challenges of food consumption. Anthropology of Food [Online] (S5 ‘Can consumers save the world?').
22.
HalkierB (2009b) Suitable cooking? Performances and positionings in cooking practices among Danish women. Food, Culture and Society12(3): 357–377.
23.
HalkierBKatz-GerroTMartensL (2011) Applying practice theory to the study of consumption: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Journal of Consumer Culture11(1): 3–13.
24.
HughnerRSMcDonaghPProtheroA (2007) Who are organic food consumers? A compilation and review of why people purchase organic food. Journal of Consumer Behaviour6(2–3): 94–110.
25.
LamineC (2008) Les Intermittents du Bio: Pour une Sociologie Pragmatique des Choix Alimentaires Émergents, Paris: Maison des sciences de l'homme.
26.
MarshallDWAndersonAS (2002) Proper meals in transition: Young married couples on the nature of eating together. Appetite39(3): 193–206.
27.
MonceauCBlanche-BarbatEÉchampeJ (2002) La consommation alimentaire depuis quarante ans. De plus en plus de produits élaborés. INSEE Première. (8461–4.
28.
Perret C (2007) Quitter sa région pour entrer à l’université: quels sont les facteurs explicatifs de la mobilité géographique des bacheliers? L'orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle [Online] 36(3).
29.
PichlerFWallaceC (2009) Social capital and social class in Europe: The role of social networks in social stratification. European Sociological Review25(3): 319–332.
30.
Plessz M and Gojard S (2013) Do processed vegetables reduce the socio-economic differences in vegetable purchases? A study in France. The European Journal of Public Health 23(5): 747–752.
31.
Plessz M and Gojard S (2015) Fresh is best? Social position, cooking, and vegetable consumption in France. Sociology 49(1): 172–190.
32.
ReckwitzA (2002) Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory5(2): 243–263.
33.
RégnierFMasulloA (2009) Obésité, goûts et consommation. Intégration des normes d’alimentation et appartenance sociale. Revue Française de Sociologie50(4): 747–773.
34.
ShoveE (2010) ) Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A42(6): 1273–1285.
35.
ShoveESouthertonD (2000) Defrosting the freezer: From novelty to convenience: A narrative of normalization. Journal of Material Culture5(3): 301–319.
36.
SouthertonD (2002) Boundaries of `us' and `them': Class, mobility and identification in a new town. Sociology36(1): 171–193.
37.
SouthertonD (2006) Analysing the temporal organization of daily life: Social constraints, practices and their allocation. Sociology40(3): 435–454.
38.
SouthertonDDíaz-méndezCWardeA (2011) Behavioural change and the temporal ordering of eating practices: A UK – Spain comparison. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food19(1): 19–36.
39.
SouthertonDTomlinsonM (2005) ‘Pressed for time'–The differential impacts of a ‘time squeeze'. Sociological Review53(2): 215–239.
40.
WardeA (2005) Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture5(2): 131–153.
41.
WatsonMMeahA (2013) Food, waste and safety: Negotiating conflicting social anxieties into the practices of domestic provisioning. In: EvansDCampbellHMurcottA (eds) Waste Matters. New Perspective on Food and society, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 102–120.
