Drawing from a network case study, this article traces enactments of a letter writing enquiry in one Kindergarten public school classroom in New York City, and in doing so, explores both the affordances and limitations of sociomaterial approaches employed by the researcher towards school literacies. Looking down at one morning meeting revealed rotting pumpkins, playdough, pocket charts and cheese sandwiches, doing the work of environmental nonprofits, DOE officials, and cafeteria staff, all becoming entangled with the teacher and students in solving the problem of food waste at lunch, and ultimately to students writing letters to their school administrators. Yet, in looking out from this same data, I reconsider how the curriculum was not only constituted by networks of circulating materials, but also by networks circulating students' bodies into unequal school spaces, fuelling changes in the school’s enrolment and funding through neighbourhood gentrification. I propose ways in which sociomaterial accounts of literacy curriculums may contribute bridgework along with accounting for structural inequalities mobilized in and through schools.
Baldwin, J (1985) A talk to teachers. In J. Baldwin (Ed.) The price of the ticket: Collected nonfiction, 1948–1985 (325–332). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
2.
BeucherRHandsfieldLHuntC (2019)
What matter matters? Retaining the critical in new materialist literacy research. Journal of Literacy Research51(4): 444–479.
3.
BraidottiR (2019)
A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society36(6): 31–61.
4.
BrandtDClintonK (2002)
Limits of the local: Expanding perspectives on literacy as a social practice. Journal of Literacy Research34(3): 337–356.
5.
BurnettCMerchantGNeumannMM (2020)
Closing the gap? Overcoming limitations in sociomaterial accounts of early literacy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy20(1): 111–133.
6.
BurnettCMerchantGPahlK, et al. (2014)
The (im)materiality of literacy: The Significance of Subjectivity to New Literacies Research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education35(1): 90–103.
7.
Calkins, L (2003) Units of Study for Primary Writing: A Yearlong Curriculum, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
8.
ChambersTTVMcCreadyLT (2011) “
Making space” for ourselves: African American student responses to their marginalization. Urban Education46(6): 1352–1378.
9.
ComberBNicholsS (2004)
Getting the big picture: Regulating knowledge in the early childhood literacy curriculum. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy4(1): 43–63.
10.
DelpitL (1988)
The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Educational Review58(3): 280–298.
11.
DernikosBPFergusonDESiegelM (2020)
The possibilities of ‘humanizing’ posthumanist inquiries: An intra-active conversation. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies20(5): 434–447.
12.
DysonAH (1993) Social Worlds of Children: Learning to Write in an Urban Primary School.
New York, NY:
Teachers College Press.
13.
EricksonF (1986) Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In: WittrockkM (ed.) Handbook of Research on Teaching. 3rd ed.
New York:
Macmillan, pp.119–161.
14.
FenwickTLandriP (2012)
Materialities, textures and pedagogies: Socio-material assemblages in education. Pedagogy, Culture & Society20(1): 1–7.
15.
FergusonDENicholsTP (2021)
School sites and the haunting of history: Unmasking the past in field-based research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2021.1942301.
16.
FreidusA (2016) “
A great school benefits us all:” Advantaged parents and the gentrification of an urban public school. Urban Education 54(8): 1121–1148.
17.
GreeneSAbt-PerkinsD (eds) (2003) Making Race Visible: Literacy Research for Cultural Understanding.
New York:
Teachers College Press.
18.
GutiérrezKD (2008)
Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly43(2): 148–164.
19.
HackettGMaclureMPahlK (2018)
Call for abstract submissions to a special issue of Journal of Early Childhood Literacy: Literacy and language as material practices: Re-thinking social inequality in young children’s literacies. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy DOI:10.1177/1468798418817402.
20.
HamiltonM (2001)
Privileged literacies: Policy, institutional process and the life of the IALS. Language and Education15(2–3): 178–196.
HarawayDJGoodeveT (2018) Modest_Witness@ Second_Millennium. Femaleman_Meets_oncomouse: Feminism and Technoscience.
London:
Routledge.
23.
HemphillCMaderN (2016) Segregated Schools in Integrated Neighborhoods: The City’s Schools Are Even More Divided than Our Housing.
New York, NY:
Center for New York City Affairs, Milano the New School for Management and Urban Policy.
24.
HeydonRMoffattLIannacciL (2015) ‘
Every day he has a dream to tell’: Classroom literacy curriculum in a full-day kindergarten. Journal of Curriculum Studies47(2): 171–202.
25.
HyunEMarshallJ (2003)
Teachable-moment-oriented curriculum practice in early childhood education. Journal of Curriculum Studies35(1): 111–127.
26.
KerstenJPardoL (2007)
Finessing and hybridizing: Innovative literacy practices in reading first classrooms. The Reading Teacher61(2): 146–154.
27.
KoyamaJ (2015)
When things come undone: The promise of dissembling education policy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education36(4): 548–559.
28.
KucseraJOrfieldG (2014) New York State’s Extreme School Segregation: Inequality, Inaction and a Damaged Future.
UCLA:
The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
29.
Ladson-BillingsG (2018)
The social funding of race: The role of schooling. Peabody Journal of Education93(1): 90–105.
30.
LatourB (1992) Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In: BijkerWELawJ (eds) Shaping Technology/Holding Society.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press, pp.151–180.
31.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social – An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
32.
LaveR (2015) Political Ecology and Actor-Network Theory. The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology, 1st ed.
London:
Routledge.
33.
LawJ (2004)
And if the global were small and noncoherent? Method, complexity, and the baroque. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22(1): 13–26.
34.
LawJ (2007) Making a mess with method. In: OuthwaiteWTurnerSP (eds) The Sage Handbook of Social Science Methodology.
London:
Sage, pp.595–606.
35.
LeanderKMLovvornJF (2006)
Literacy networks: Following the circulation of texts, bodies, and objects in the schooling and online gaming of one youth. Cognition and Instruction24(3): 291–340.
36.
LeanderKMPhillipsNCTaylorKH (2010)
The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education34(1): 329–394.
37.
LentersK (2014)
Just doing our jobs: A case study of literacy-in-action in a fifth-grade literature circle. Language and Literacy16(1): 53–70.
38.
LentersK (2019)
Nerdisms, almina, and the petsitter: Becoming social commentary composers. Research in the Teaching of English53(4): 363–389.
39.
LeonardoZ (2002)
The souls of white folk: Critical pedagogy, whiteness studies, and globalization discourse. Race Ethnicity and Education5(1): 29–50.
40.
MahiriJ (2005)
From 3 R’s to 3 c’s: Corporate curriculum and culture in public schools. Social Justice32(3): 72–88.
41.
MobergE (2018)
Exploring the relational efforts making up a curriculum concept – An actor-network theory analysis of the curriculum concept of children’s interests. Journal of Curriculum Studies50(1): 113–125.
42.
NesporJ (1994) Knowledge in Motion: Space, Time and Curriculum in Undergraduate Physic and Management.
London:
The Falmer Press.
43.
NesporJ (2002)
Networks and contexts of reform. Journal of Educational Change3(3/4): 365–382.
44.
NeumanSBCelanoD (2001)
Access to print in low‐income and middle‐income communities: An ecological study of four neighborhoods. Reading Research Quarterly36(1): 8–26.
45.
NicholsSRainbirdS (2013)
The mall, the library and the church: Inquiring into the resourcing of early learning through new spaces and networks. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education26(2): 198–215.
46.
NicholsSRowsellJNixonH, et al. (2012) Resourcing Early Learners: New Networks, New Actors (Routledge Research in Education).
Florence, KY:
Routledge.
47.
NicholsTCampanoG (2017)
Post-Humanism and literacy studies. Language Arts94(4): 245–251.
48.
OlsenB (2010) In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects.
New York, NY:
Rowman Altamira.
49.
ParsonsSAVaughnMScalesRQ, et al. (2018)
Teachers’ instructional adaptations: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research88(2): 205–242.
Posey-MaddoxL (2014) When Middle-Class Parents Choose Urban Schools: Class, Race, and the Challenges of Equity in Public Education.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
52.
PrinslooM (2005)
The new literacies as placed resources: Research: information and communication technologies. Perspectives in Education23(1): 87–98.
53.
QuinnJ (2013)
Theorising learning and nature: Post-human possibilities and problems. Gender and Education25(6): 738–753.
54.
Rodríguez-MuñizM (2016)
Bridgework: STS, sociology, and the “dark matters” of race. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society2: 214–226.
55.
RosiekJKinslowK (2015) Resegregation as Curriculum: The Meaning of the New Racial Segregation in US Public Schools.
London:
Routledge.
56.
SayesE (2014)
Actor–network theory and methodology: Just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency?Social Studies of Science44(1): 134–149.
57.
SheehyM (2004) Between a thick and a thin place: Changing literacy practice. In: LeanderKMSheehyM (eds) Spatializing Literacy Research and Practice.
New York:
Peter Lang, pp.91–114.
58.
SherbineK (2018)
Track star+ thing power: Be(com)ing in the literacy workshop. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy20(4): 613–618.
59.
SkinnerDRosenP (2001)
Opening the white box: The politics of racialised science and technology. Science as Culture10(3): 285–300.
60.
SmagorinskyPLaklyAJohnsonT (2002)
Acquiescence, accommodation, and resistance in learning to teach within a prescribed curriculum. English Education34(3): 187–213.
61.
SnyderJBolinFZumwaltK (1992)
Curriculum implementation. Handbook of Research on Curriculum40(4): 402–435.
62.
StornaiuoloALeBlancRJ (2016)
Scaling as a literacy activity: Mobility and educational inequality in an age of global connectivity. Research in the Teaching of English50(3): 263–287.
63.
StrathernM (1996)
Cutting the network. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute2(3): 517–535.
64.
ThielJJ (2015) “
Bumblebee’s in trouble!” embodied literacies during imaginative superhero play. Language Arts93: 38–49.
65.
ThielJJJonesS (2017)
The literacies of things: Reconfiguring the material-discursive production of race and class in an informal learning centre. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy17(3): 315–335.
66.
WargoJM (2018)
Writing with wearables? Young children’s intra-active authoring and the sounds of emplaced invention. Journal of Literacy Research50(4): 502–523.
67.
WinnerL (1993)
Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values18(3): 362–378.
68.
YoonH (2013)
Rewriting the curricular script: Teachers and children translating writing practices in a kindergarten classroom. Research in the Teaching of English48(2): 148–174.
69.
ZapataAKubyCRThielJJ (2018)
Encounters with writing: Becoming-with posthumanist ethics. Journal of Literacy Research50(4): 478–501.
