The current study meta-analyzed 27 effects from 21 studies to determine the effect assessment of text difficulty had on reading fluency interventions, which resulted in an overall weighted effect size (ES) = 0.43 (95% CI = [0.25, 0.62], p < .001). Using reading passages that represented an instructional level based on accuracy criteria led to a large weighted effect of ES = 1.03, 95% CI = [0.65, 1.40], p < .01), which was reliably larger (p < .05) than that for reading fluency interventions that used reading passages with an instructional level based on rate criteria (weighted ES = 0.29, 95% CI = [0.07, 0.50], p < .01). Using reading passages based on leveling systems or those written at the students’ current grade level resulted in small weighted effects. The approach to determining difficulty for reading passages used in reading fluency interventions accounted for 11% of the variance in the effect (p < .05) beyond student group (no risk, at-risk, disability) and type of fluency intervention. The largest weighted effect was found for students with reading disabilities (ES = 1.14, 95% CI = [0.64, 1.65], p < .01).
*ArdoinS. P.EckertT. L.ColeC. A. (2008). Promoting generalization of reading: A comparison of two fluency-based interventions for improving general education student’s oral reading rate. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-008-9066-1
2.
BarthA. E.TolarT. D.FletcherJ. M.FrancisD. (2014). The effects of student and text characteristics on the oral reading fluency of middle-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033826
3.
BasaranM. (2013). Reading fluency as an indicator of reading comprehension. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(4), 2287–2290. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.4.1922
4.
BeaverJ. M.CarterM. A. (2006). The Developmental Reading Assessment–Second edition (DRA2). Pearson.
5.
BettsE. (1946). Foundations of reading instruction. American Book Company.
6.
*BrownL. T.MohrK. A.WilcoxB. R.BarrettT. S. (2018). The effects of dyad reading and text difficulty on third-graders’ reading achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 111(5), 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1310711
7.
BunchM. B. (2017). Test review of the basic reading inventory, eleventh edition. In CarlsonJ. F.GeisingerK. F.JonsonJ. L. (Eds.), The twentieth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 112–113). Buros Center for Testing.
8.
*BurnsM. K. (2007). Reading at the instructional level with children identified as learning disabled: Potential implications for response-to-intervention. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(3), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.22.3.297
9.
BurnsM. K. (2023). Examining the learning hierarchy with accuracy and rate scores for reading fluency among second- and third-grade students. Journal of Behavioral Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-023-09536-2
10.
BurnsM. K.ParkerD. C. (2014). Curriculum-based assessment for instructional design: Using data to individualize instruction. Guilford Publications.
11.
*BurnsM. K.PullesS. M.MakiK. E.KaniveR.HodgsonJ.HelmanL. A.McComasJ. J.PreastJ. L. (2015). Accuracy of student performance while reading leveled books rated at their instructional level by a reading inventory. Journal of School Psychology, 53(6), 437–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2015.09.003
12.
BurnsM. K.TuckerJ. A.FrameJ.FoleyS.HauserA. (2000). Interscorer, alternate- form, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of Gickling’s model of curriculum-based assessment for reading. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 18(4), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290001800405
13.
*CarrC. E.UmbreitJ.HartzellR. (2022). Instructional level and engagement in students with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 47(4), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/01987429211050014
14.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
CoulterW. A.CoulterE. M. (1989). Curriculum-based assessment for instructional design (CBAID): The trainers handbook. Directions & Resources Group.
16.
DenoS. L.MirkinP. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Council for Exceptional Children.
17.
EdWeek Research Center. (2020). Early reading instruction: Results of a national survey. Editorial Projects in Education.
18.
*Fascio-VereenS. T. (2004). A comparison of reading interventions using social studies text to improve oral reading fluency of middle school students [Doctoral dissertation]. Mississippi State University.
19.
FountasI. C.PinnellG. S. (2007). Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Assessment System 2. Heinemann.
20.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HospM. K.JenkinsJ. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239–256.
GicklingE. E.ArmstrongD. L. (1978). Levels of instructional difficulty as related to on-task behavior, task completion, and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11(9), 559–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194780110090
23.
GicklingE. E.HavertapeS. (1981). Curriculum-based assessment (CBA). School Psychology Inservice Training Network, University of Minnesota.
24.
HargisC. H. (1987). Curriculum-based assessment: A primer. Charles C. Thomas.
25.
*HawkinsR. O.HaleA.SheeleyW.LingS. (2011). Repeated reading and vocabulary-previewing interventions to improve fluency and comprehension for struggling high-school readers. Psychology in the Schools, 48(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20545
26.
HedgesL. V.PustejovskyJ. E.ShadishW. R. (2012). A standardized mean difference effect size for single case designs. Research Synthesis Methods, 3, 224–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1052
27.
HoffmanJ. V. (2017). What if “just right” is just wrong? The unintended consequences of leveling readers. The Reading Teacher, 71(3), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1611
28.
*HomanS. P.KlesiusJ. P.HiteC. (1993). Effects of repeated readings and nonrepetitive strategies on students’ fluency and comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 87(2), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1993.9941172
29.
HudsonA.KohP. W.MooreK. A.Binks-CantrellE. (2020). Fluency interventions for elementary students with reading difficulties: A synthesis of research from 2000–2019. Education Sciences, 10(3), 52–77. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030052
JohnsJ. L. (2017). Basic reading inventory (11th ed.). Kendall Hunt.
32.
KeyesS. E.CartledgeG.GibsonL.Jr.Robinson-ErvinP. (2016). Programming for generalization of oral reading fluency using computer-assisted instruction and changing fluency criteria. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(2), 141–172. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2016.0011
33.
KimY. S. G.WagnerR. K. (2015). Text (oral) reading fluency as a construct in reading development: An investigation of its mediating role for children from grades 1 to 4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(3), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2015.1007375
34.
LeeJ.YoonS. Y. (2017). The effects of repeated reading on reading fluency for students with reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415605194
35.
*LeVasseurV. M.MacarusoP.ShankweilerD. (2008). Promoting gains in reading fluency: A comparison of three approaches. Reading and Writing, 21, 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9070-1
36.
MakiK. E.Hammerschmidt-SnidarichS. (2022). Reading fluency intervention dosage: A novel meta-analysis and research synthesis. Journal of School Psychology, 92, 148–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.03.008
37.
*MakiK. E.IttnerA.PullesS. M.BurnsM. K.HelmanL.McComasJ. J. (2023). Effects of an abbreviated class-wide reading intervention for students in third grade. Contemporary School Psychology, 26(3), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-020-00343-4
38.
*MaloufR.ReisenerC.GadkeD.WimbishS.FrankelA. (2014). The effect of helping early literacy with practice strategies on reading fluency for children with severe reading impairments. Reading Improvement, 51(2), 269–279.
39.
*MartensB. K.EckertT. L.BegenyJ. C.LewandowskiL. J.DiGennaroF. D.MontarelloS. A.ArbolinoL. A.ReedD. D.FieseB. H. (2007). Effects of a fluency-building program on the reading performance of low-achieving second and third grade students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-006-9022-x
MorrisD.MeyerC.TrathenW.McGeeJ.VinesN.StewartT.GillT.SchlagalR. (2017). The simple view, instructional level, and the plight of struggling fifth-sixth-grade readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(3), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1203272
42.
*Musti-RaoS.HawkinsR. O.BarkleyE. A. (2009). Effects of repeated readings on the oral reading fluency of urban fourth-grade students: Implications for practice. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.54.1.12-23
43.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
44.
NikolakopoulouA.MavridisD.SalantiG. (2014). Demystifying fixed and random effects meta-analysis. Evidence-based Mental Health, 17(2), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2014-101795
45.
NilssonN. L. (2013). The reliability of informal reading inventories: What has changed?Reading & Writing Quarterly, 29(3), 208–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2013.789779
46.
*O’ConnorR. E.WhiteA.SwansonH. L. (2007). Repeated reading versus continuous reading: Influences on reading fluency and comprehension. Exceptional Children, 74(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707400102
47.
*O’SheaL. J.SindelarP. T.O’SheaD. J. (1985). The effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on reading fluency and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968509547535
48.
*PaigeD. D. (2011). 16 minutes of “Eyes-on-Text” can make a difference: Whole-class choral reading as an adolescent fluency strategy. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 51(1), 3–23. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol51/iss1/3
49.
*ParkerD. C.BurnsM. K. (2014). Using the instructional level as a criterion to target reading interventions. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 30(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2012.702047
50.
ParkerD. C.ZaslofskyA. F.BurnsM. K.KaniveR.HodgsonJ.ScholinS. E.KlingbeilD. A. (2015). A brief report of the diagnostic accuracy of oral reading fluency and reading inventory levels for reading failure risk among second- and third-grade students. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 31(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2013.857970
51.
PustejovskyJ. E.ChenM.HamiltonB.GrekovP. (2023). scdhlm: A web-based calculator for between-case standardized mean differences (Version 0.7.2) [Web application]. https://jepusto.shinyapps.io/scdhlm
52.
ReschlyA. L.BuschT. W.BettsJ.DenoS. L.LongJ. D. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of School Psychology, 47(6), 427–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.07.001
ShapiroE. S. (1996). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention. Guilford.
57.
ShapiroE. S. (2010). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention (4th ed.). Guilford.
58.
*SimmonsD. C.FuchsL. S.FuchsD.MathesP.HodgeJ. P. (1995). Effects of explicit teaching and peer tutoring on the reading achievement of learning-disabled and low-performing students in regular classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 95(5), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1086/461851
59.
StarlinC.StarlinA. (1973). Guides for continuous decision making. Unique Curriculum Unlimited.
60.
TherrienW. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta- analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25(4), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250040801
61.
*TherrienW. J.HughesC. (2008). Comparison of repeated reading and question generation on students’ reading fluency and comprehension. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 6(1), 1–16. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ797653.pdf
62.
*TreptowM. A.BurnsM. K.McComasJ. J. (2007). Reading at the frustration, instructional, and independent levels: The effects on students’ reading comprehension and time on task. School Psychology Review, 36(1), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2007.12087958
63.
*VadasyP. F.SandersE. A. (2008). Benefits of repeated reading intervention for low- achieving fourth-and fifth-grade students. Remedial and Special Education, 29(4), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932507312013
64.
ValentineJ. C.Tanner-SmithE. E.PustejovskyJ. E.LauT. S. (2016). Between-case standardized mean difference effect sizes for single-case designs: A primer and tutorial using the scdhlm web application. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 12(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.4073/cmdp.2016.1
65.
VanderheydenA. M.SolomonB. G. (2023). Valid outcomes for screening and progress monitoring: Fluency is superior to accuracy in curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology, 38(3), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000528
66.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2022). What Works Clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook (Version 5.0). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE). https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks
67.
YoungC.MohrK. A.RasinskiT. (2015). Reading together: A successful reading fluency intervention. Literacy Research and Instruction, 54(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2014.976678
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
