Using data from a 2-year empirical project in an urban school within the United States, this article describes how educators of preschool, transitional-kindergarten and kindergarten (PreK-TK-K) altered perceptions and practices as a result of participating in a purposefully crafted professional learning community using collaborative enquiry. Emergent thematic findings highlight shifts in educator understanding and application of interactive reading practice and alignment across classrooms of young learners. This vertical professional learning community provided space and time where educators constructed meaning through collaborative enquiry, video observations and reflection, which informed educator thinking and enriched student interaction for literacy learning.
AllardHMarshallJ (1977) Miss Nelson is Missing. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
2.
BennettKJonesN (2005) Not Norman, a Goldfish Story. Massachusetts: Candlewick Press.
3.
BerryJPotterJHollasV (2013) Concept maps and informational read-alouds: Strengthening both science and reading for elementary students. Texas Journal of Literacy Education1(1): 29–44.
4.
Bertrand L, RobertsRBuchananR (2006) Striving for success: Teacher perspectives of a vertical team initiative. National Forum of Teacher Education Journal16(3): 1–10.
GlasserBGStraussL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theories, Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York, NY: Aldine.
17.
HogganKStrongC (1994) The magic of “once upon a time”: Narrative teaching strategies. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools25(2): 76–89.
18.
HordSMSommersW (2008) Leading Professional Learning Communities: Voices from Research and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
19.
JacobsGM (2016) Dialogic reading aloud to promote extensive reading. Extensive Reading in Japan9(1): 10–12.
20.
JusticeLMLoganJKaderavekJN (2017) Longitudinal impacts of print-focused read-alouds for children with language impairments. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology26(2): 383–396.
21.
LadenN (1994) The Night I Followed the Dog. San Francisco: Chronicle Books.
22.
LaneHBWrightTL (2007) Maximizing the effectiveness of reading aloud. The Reading Teacher60(7): 668–675.
23.
LinL (2014) Learning word meanings from teacher’s repeated story read-aloud in EFL primary classrooms. English Language Teaching7(7): 68–81.
24.
LohfinkG (2014) The impact of a school-university multicultural read-aloud project on pre-service teachers’ pedagogical understandings. School-University Partnerships7(2): 34–47.
25.
MarchessaultJKLarwinKH (2014) The potential impact of structured read-aloud on middle school reading achievement. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education3(3): 187–196.
National Association of Elementary School Principals (NAESP) (2014) Leading pre-K-3 learning communities competencies for effective principal practice executive summary. Collaborative Communications Group, Inc. National Association of Elementary School Principals. Available at: www.naesp.org/sites/default/files/leading-pre-k-3-learning-communities-executive-summary.pdf (accessed 7 July 2020).
29.
Oliviera A (2015) Reading engagement in science: Elementary students’ read-aloud experiences. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education 10(3): 429–451.
30.
ReynoldsAJMagnusonKAOuSR (2010) Preschool-to-third grade programs and practices: A review of research. Children and Youth Services Review32(8): 1121–1131.
31.
ReynoldsAJTempleJA (2008) Cost-effective early childhood development programs from preschool to third grade. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology4(1): 109–139.
32.
SargeantJ (2012) Qualitative research part II: Participants, analysis, and quality assurance. Journal of Graduate Medical Education4(1): 1–3.
33.
ScilliannDBowersT (2010) Memoirs of a Goldfish. Michigan: Sleeping Bear Press.
34.
StephensDMorganDNDeFordDE, et al. (2011) The impact of literacy coaches on teachers’ beliefs and practices. Journal of Literacy Research43(3): 215–249.
35.
Tichnor-WagnerAWachenJCannataM, et al. (2017) Continuous improvement in the public school context: Understanding how educators respond to plan-do-study-act cycles. Journal of Educational Change18(4): 465–494.
36.
TraceyDRheeJAbrantesA (2011) Teacher read-alouds with and without student companion texts: Quantitative and qualitative findings. In: Paper presented at the 61st Annual Conference of the Literacy Research Association, Jacksonville Florida.
VaszauskasJ (2001) Educational change, Balrige, and Schlechty. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly5(2): 114–134.
39.
VescioVRossDAdamsA (2008) A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education24(1): 80–91.
40.
VygotskyL (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
WadsworthR (2008) Using read alouds in today’s classrooms. Leadership Compass5(3): 1–3.
42.
WaldronNLMcleskeyJ (2010) Establishing a collaborative school culture through comprehensive school reform. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation20(1): 58–74.
43.
WisemanA (2011) Interactive read alouds: Teachers and students constructing knowledge and literacy together. Early Childhood Education Journal38(6): 431–438.
