National governments in Britain have consistently promised that, while they would legislate for a curriculum, it would not tell teachers how to teach. Our article suggests, however, that this policy is compromised with the current programme to `remodel the workforce' and augment the role of the classroom or teaching assistant. It does this in three ways. First, it examines the likelihood that what a teacher is may subtly change and overlap with the TA's new role. Second, it argues that despite what the government says, TAs will have little professional authority to question centrally determined initiatives regarding methods and approaches to teaching. And third, it takes a detailed and critical look at recommendations for teaching and learning contained within the government's publication Additional Literacy Support . This national programme for seven-year-old pupils comes complete with `Example Scripts' that are said to model `a perfect lesson' for TAs to imitate. We reflect upon these scripted lessons in detail, suggest that their view of perfection is at best contentious and conclude with the possibility that TAs may increasingly come to serve as a conduit for a centrally contrived pedagogy.
Alexander, R. (2004) `Still No Pedagogy?: Principles, Pragmatism and Compliance in Primary Education', Cambridge Journal of Education34(1): 7—33.
2.
Alexander, R.J., Rose, A.J. and Woodhead, C. (1992) Curriculum Organisation and Classroom Practice in Primary Schools: A Discussion Paper. London: DES.
3.
Apple, M. (2004) Ideology and CurriculumThird Edition. London: Routledge Falmer.
4.
Barton, P. (2005) `“Associates” Bend More than Words ', in Times Educational Supplement (6 May).
5.
Beard, R. (2003) National Literacy Strategy: Review of Research and other Related Evidence. London: DfEE.
6.
Burns, C. and Myhill, D. (2004) `Interactive or Inactive?: A Consideration of the Nature of Interaction in Whole Class Teaching', Cambridge Journal of Education34(1): 35—49.
7.
Cameron, D. (2000) Good to Talk?: Living and Working in a Communication Culture. London: Sage.
8.
Carter, R. (2003) `The Grammar of Talk: Spoken English, Grammar and the Classroom', in New Perspectives on Spoken English in the Classroom: Discussion Papers, pp. 5—13. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA).
9.
Carter, R. (2004) Language and Creativity:The Art of Common Talk . London: Routledge.
10.
Claxton, G. (2002) Building Learning Power: Helping Young People Become Better Learners. Bristol: TLO.
11.
Coulby, D. (2000) Beyond the National Curriculum: Curricular Centralism and Cultural Diversity in Europe and the U.S.A. London : Routledge Falmer.
12.
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) ( 1998a) The National Literacy Strategy: Shared and Guided Reading and Writing at Pre-key Stage 1 and Key Stage 1. Activity Resource Bank: Module 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press /DfEE.
13.
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) ( 1998b) The National Literacy Strategy: Shared and Guided Reading and Writing at Key Stage 2 (Fiction and Poetry). Activity Resource Bank: Module 5Oxford: Oxford University Press /DfEE.
14.
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) ( 1998c) The National Literacy Strategy: A Framework for Teaching . London: DfEE.
15.
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) ( 1999a) The National Literacy Strategy: Additional Literacy Support. Module 1London: Department for Education and Employment.
16.
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) ( 1999b) The National Literacy Strategy: Additional Literacy Support. Module 2London: DfEE.
17.
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) ( 1999c) The National Literacy Strategy: Additional Literacy Support. Module 3. London: Department for Education and Employment.
18.
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) ( 1999d) The National Literacy Strategy: Additional Literacy Support. Module 4. London: DfEE.
19.
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) ( 2000) Teaching Assistant File: Induction Training for Teaching Assistants. London: Department for Education and Employment.
20.
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) ( 2001) The National Literacy Strategy: Early Literacy Support . London: DfEE.
21.
Department for Education and Skills (DfES) ( 2002) The National Literacy Strategy: Further Literacy Support . London: DfES.
22.
Department for Education and Skills (DfES) ( 2003) Excellence and Enjoyment:A Strategy for Primary Schools . London: DfES.
23.
Department of Education and Science (DES) ( 1989) National Curriculum: From Policy to Practice. London: HMSO.
24.
Department of Education and Science (DES) ( 1991) Citizen's Charter: The Parent's Charter. London: HMSO.
25.
Dombey, H. (2003) `Interactions between Teachers, Children and Texts in Three Primary Classrooms in England', Journal of Early Childhood Literacy3(1): 37—58.
26.
English, E., Hargreaves, L. and Hislam, J. (2002) `Pedagogical Dilemmas in the National Literacy Strategy: Primary Teachers' Perceptions, Reflections and Classroom Behaviour ', Cambridge Journal of Education32(1): 9—26.
27.
Eyres, I. (2000) Primary English: Developing Subject Knowledge. London: Open University/Paul Chapman Publishing.
28.
Furedi, F. (2004) Where Have All the Intellectuals Gone?: Confronting 21st Century Philistinism. London: Continuum.
29.
Gibson, H. (2005) `What Creativity Isn't: The Presumptions of Instrumental and Individual Justifications for Creativity in Education', British Journal of Educational Studies53(2): 148—67.
30.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1989) Spoken and Written Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
Hardman, F., Smith, F. and Wall, K. (2003) `“Interactive Whole Class Teaching” in the National Literacy Strategy', Cambridge Journal of Education33(2): 197—215.
32.
Hargreaves, L., Moyles, J., Merry, R., Paterson, F., Pell, A. and Esarte-Sarries, V. (2003) `How do Primary Teachers Define and Implement “Interactive Teaching” in the National Literacy Strategy in England?', Research Papers in Education18(3): 217—36.
33.
Hmso (1999) Handbook for Inspecting Primary and Nursery Schools. London: OFSTED.
34.
Hmso (2003) Inspecting Schools: Handbook for Inspecting Nursery and Primary. London: OFSTED.
35.
Hoether, J. and Ahlbrand, W.P. (1969) `The Persistence of Recitation', American Educational Research Journal6(2): 145—67.
36.
Hughes, T. (1986) The Iron Man. London: Faber and Faber.
37.
Mroz, M., Smith, F. and Hardman, F. (2000) `The Discourse of the Literacy Strategy', Cambridge Journal of Education30(3): 379—90.
38.
National Curriculum Council (NCC) (1989) The National Curriculum. An Introduction: The New Terminology. London: HMSO.
39.
National Curriculum Council (NCC) (1992) National Curriculum English:The Case for Revising the Order. York: NCC.
40.
OFSTED (2005) The National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies and the Primary Curriculum. London: OFSTED.
41.
Shulman, L.S. (1998) `Theory, Practice and the Education of Professionals' , Elementary School Journal98(5): 511—26.
42.
Sinclair, J.McH. and Coulthard, R.M. (1975) Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
Sinnott, S. (2005) `The NUT opposed the Workforce Remodelling Agreement: Has it changed its Stance?', Education Guardian (1 March), URL (consulted November 2007): http://education.guardian.co.uk/remodelling/story/0,,1423467,00.html
44.
Skidmore, D. (2001) `Having your Own Voice Valued', in P. Goodwin (ed.) The Articulate Classroom:Talking and Learning in the Primary School, pp. 9—14. London: David Fulton.
45.
Skidmore, D., Perez-Parent, M. and Arnfield, S. (2003) `Teacher—Pupil Dialogue in the Guided Reading Session', Reading Literacy and Language37(2): 47—53.
46.
Spender, D. (1985) Man Made Language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
47.
Teacher Training Agency (TTA) (2003) Higher Level Teaching Assistant: Professional Standards for Higher Level Teaching Assistants (September 2003), URL (consulted October 2003): http://www.hlta.gov.uk
48.
Tharp, R.G. and Gallimore, R. (1988) Rousing Minds to Life:Teaching, Learning, and Schooling in Social Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
The SchoolMaster and Woman Teacher's Chronicle: The Journal of the National Union of Teachers (1956) CLXX (2,452) (27 July).
50.
Wild, C. and Goodwin, G. (2005) `ALT Conference 2005: Education! Education! Education! ', Report27(8): 16.
51.
Wyse, D. (2003) `The National Literacy Strategy: A Critical Review of Empirical Evidence', British Educational Research Journal29(6): 903—16.
