Under dominant, autonomous views of literacy, students’ humorous language use during literacy events is often dismissed as ‘off task’ behaviour. Taking a languaging perspective, this paper considers how third-grade, emergent bilingual students’ humorous language use functioned in both ‘official’ and ‘peer’ worlds during eBook composing events across one year. Microethnographic analyses of humorous events suggest that students’ humorous languaging practices not only supported the work of composing texts but also helped them connect to peers and construct their own and others’ social positions within the classroom. Implications for pedagogy, including the importance of creating classroom spaces where students can talk and interact with one another while composing, are discussed.
BeckerAL (1985) Language in particular: A lecture. In: TannenD (ed) Linguistics in Context: Connecting Observation and Understanding. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. 17–35.
3.
BernsteinDK (1986) The development of humor: Implications for assessment and intervention. Topics in Language Disorders6(4): 65–71.
4.
BloomeDBeaucheminF (2016) Languaging everyday life in classrooms. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice65: 152–165.
5.
BloomeDEgan-Robertson (1993) The social construction of intertextuality in classroom reading and writing lessons. Reading Research Quarterly28(4): 304–333.
6.
BloomeDKalmanJSeymourM (2018) Fashioning literacy as social. In: BloomeDCastanheiraMLLeungC, et al. (eds) Re-theorizing Literacy Practices: Complex Social and Cultural Contexts. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 15–29.
7.
BloomeDPower CarterS (2013) Microethnographic discourse analysis. In: AlbersPHolbrookTFlintAS (eds) New Methods of Literacy Research. New York: Taylor and Francis, pp. 3–18.
8.
BloomeDPower CarterSChristianBM, et al. (2010) Discourse Analysis and the Study of Classroom Language and Literacy Events: A Microethnographic Perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
BomerRLamanTT (2004) Positioning in a primary writing workshop: Joint action in the discursive production of writing subjects. Research in the Teaching of English38(4): 420–466.
10.
BucholtzMHallJK (2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies7(4–5): 585–614.
11.
CalkinsLM (1994) The Art of Teaching Writing. Portsmout, NH: Heinemann.
12.
CekaiteAAronssonK (2004) Repetition and joking in children’s second language conversations: Playful recyclings in an immersion classroom. Discourse Studies6(3): 373–392.
13.
CorbinJStraussA (2008) Basics of Qualitative Work. Los Angeles: SAGE.
14.
DuránL (2017) Audience in young bilingual writers: Building on strengths. Journal of Literacy Research49(1): 92–114.
15.
DysonAH (1987) The value of ‘time off task’: Young children’s spontaneous talk and deliverate text. Harvard Educational Review57(4): 396–420.
16.
DysonAH (1993) Social Worlds of Children Learning to Write in an Urban Primary School. New York: Teachers College Press.
17.
DysonAH (1994) Confronting the split between “the child” and children: Toward new curricular visions of the child writer. English Education26(1): 12–28.
18.
DysonAH (1997) Writing Superheroes: Contemporary Childhood, Popular Culture, and Classroom Literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.
19.
DysonAH (2012) The place of childhoods in school writing programs: A matter of ethics. In: LarsonJMarshJ (eds) The Sage Handbook of Early Childhood Literacy. London: SAGE, pp. 485–500.
20.
EmersonRMFretzRIShawLL (2011) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
FreireP (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: Seabury Press.
22.
GarcíaO (2009) Emergent bilinguals and TESOL: What’s in a name?TESOL Quarterly43(2): 322–326.
23.
GarcíaOTorres-GuevaraR (2010) Monoglossic ideologies and language policies in the education of U.S. Latinas/os. In: MurilloEG Jr. VillenasSAGalvánRT, et al. (eds) Handbook of Latinos and Education: Research, Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 182–193.
24.
GhisoMP (2011) ‘Writing that matters’: Collaborative inquiry and authoring practices in a first-grade class. Language Arts88(5): 346–355.
25.
GhisoMP (2015) Arguing from experience: Young children’s embodied knowledge and writing as inquiry. Journal of Literacy Research47(2): 186–215.
26.
Google LLC (2018) Google Translate. 5.25.0 ed.
27.
GumperzJJ (1992) Contextualization and understanding. In: DurantiAGoodwinC (eds) Rethinking Context. New York: Cambridge, pp. 229–252.
28.
GutiérrezKRymesBLarsonJ (1995) Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review65(3): 445–471.
29.
HeapJL (1989) Writing as social action. Theory Into Practice28(2): 148–153.
30.
HeathSBStreetBV (2008) Ethnography: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research. New York: Teachers College Press.
31.
HikidaM (2018) Literacy and the time being. In: BloomeDCastanheiraMLLeungC, et al. (eds) Re-theorizing Literacy Practices: Complex Social and Cultural Contexts. New York: Routledge, pp. 197–208.
32.
JaegerE (2019) Friends and authors: Spontaneous co-composing in a writing workshop. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. Epub ahead of print 6 March 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1468798419833096.
33.
KinlochVSan PedroT (2014) The space between listening and storytelling: Foundations for projects in humanization. In: ParisDWinnM (eds) Humanizing Research: Decolonizing Qualitative Inquiry with Youth and Communities. Los Angeles: SAGE, pp. 21–42.
34.
LentersK (2016) Riding the lines and overwriting in the margins: Affect and multimodal literacy practices. Journal of Literacy Research48(3): 280–316.
35.
LinkHGalloSWorthamS (2017) The production of schoolchildren as Enlightenment subjects. American Educational Research Journal54(5): 834–867.
36.
LytraV (2007) Play Frames and Social Identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
37.
MartínezRAMejíaAF (2020) Looking closely and listening carefully: A sociocultural approach to understanding the complexity of Latina/o/x students’ everyday language. Theory Into Practice 59(1): 53–63.
38.
MartínezRAMoralesPZ (2014) ¿Puras groserías?: Rethinking the role of profanity and graphic humor in Latin@ students’ bilingual wordplay. Anthropology & Education Quarterly45(4): 337–354.
39.
MilesMBHubermanAMSaldanaJ (2013) Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
40.
MilnerHR (2010) Start Where You Are, But Don’t Stay There: Understanding Diversity, Opportunity Gaps, and Teaching in Today’s Classrooms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
41.
NguyenM (2018) The underlife of the classroom. Journal of Classroom Interaction53(1): 52–70.
42.
OrellanaMF (2001) The work kids do: Mexican and Central American immigrant children’s contributions to households and schools in California. Harvard Educational Review71(3): 366–389.
43.
PrinslooM (2005) The new literacies as placed resources. Perspectives in Education23(4): 87–98.
44.
RankerJ (2009) Student appropriation of writing lessons through hybrid composing practices: Direct, diffuse, and indirect use of teacher-offered writing tools in an ESL classroom. Journal of Literacy Research41: 393–431.
45.
RoweDW (2008) Social contracts for writing: Negotiating shared understanding about text in the preschool years. Reading Research Quarterly43(1): 66–95.
46.
RoweDWMillerME (2017) The affordances of touchscreen tablets and digital cameras as tools for young children’s multimodal, multilingual composing. In: BurnettCMerchantGSimpsonA, et al. (eds) The Case of the iPad: Mobile Literacies in Education. Singapore: Springer, pp. 159–178.
47.
SchultzK (1997) ‘Do you want to be in my story?’: Collaborative writing in an urban elementary classroom. Journal of Literacy Research29(2): 253–287.
48.
Souto-ManningM (2014) Making a stink about the ‘ideal’ classroom: Theorizing and storying conflict in early childhood education. Urban Education49(6): 607–634.
49.
StreetBV (1995) Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy in Development, Ethnography, and Education. London: Routledge.
50.
TarshisL (2011) I Survived Hurricane Katrina, 2005. New York: Scholastic.
51.
VasudevanLSchultzKBatemanJ (2010) Rethinking composing in a digital age: Authoring literate identities through multimodal storytelling. Written Communication27(4): 442–468.
52.
VygotskyLS (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
53.
WhiteEJ (2014) ‘Are you ‘avin a laff?’: A pedagogical response to Bakhtinian carnivalesque in early childhood education. Educational Philosophy and Theory46(8): 898–913.
54.
WorthamSReyesA (2015) Discourse Analysis: Beyond the Speech Event. New York: Routledge.
