This paper reports the findings of a two-year design study exploring instructional conditions supporting emerging, bilingual/biliterate, four-year-olds’ digital composing. With adult support, children used child-friendly, digital cameras and iPads equipped with writing, drawing and bookmaking apps to compose multimodal, multilingual eBooks containing photos, child-produced drawings, writing and voice recordings. Children took digital cameras home, and home photos were loaded onto the iPads for bookmaking. In Year 1, eBook activities successfully supported children’s multimodal composing. Children used similar writing forms on the page and screen, and explored the keyboard as an option for writing. Children used digital images as anchors for conversation and composing, and produced oral recordings extending and elaborating written messages. However, most dual-language recordings were created by Spanish-English bilinguals, with speakers of other languages rarely composing in their heritage languages. In Year 2, we redesigned eBook events to better support all children as multimodal, multilingual composers. Revised eBook activities included multilingual, demonstration eBooks containing all the children’s languages, with translations by bilingual adults known to the children. Beginning early in the school year, these eBooks were publicly shared in large group activities. The results showed that all emergent bilingual/biliterate children created dual-language recordings for their eBooks in Year 2. We concluded that: (a) the ability to integrate photos and voice recordings with print and drawings provided new opportunities for learning and teaching not available in page-based composing; (b) the affordances of iPads for children’s learning were shaped by local language and literacy practices.
AllenJFabregasVHankinsKH (2002) PhOLKS Lore: Learning from photographs, families, and children. Language Arts79(4): 312–322.
2.
Apple Inc. (2013) iBooks (Version 3.1). Available at: http://itunes.apple.com (accessed 5 March 2013).
3.
BernhardJKCumminsJCampoyFI (2006) Identity texts and literacy development among preschool English language learners: Enhancing learning opportunities for children at risk for learning disabilities. Teachers College Record108(11): 2280–2405.
4.
BernhardJKWinslerABleikerC (2008) “Read my story!” Using the Early Authors Program to promote early literacy among diverse, urban preschool children in poverty. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk13(1): 76–105.
5.
BeschornerBHutchisonA (2013) iPads as a literacy teaching tool in early childhood. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology1(1): 16–24.
6.
BigelowE (2013) iWrite: Digital Message Making Practices of Young Children, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
BrandtD (1998) Sponsors of literacy. College Composition and Communication49(2): 165–185.
9.
BrandtDClintonK (2002) Limits of the local: Expanding perspectives on literacy as social practice. Journal of Literacy Research34(3): 337–356.
10.
BusAGvan IJzendoornMH (1995) Mothers reading to their three-year-olds: The role of mother-child attachment security in becoming literate. Reading Research Quarterly30: 998–1015.
11.
CambourneB (1995) Toward an educationally relevant theory of literacy learning: Twenty years of inquiry. The Reading Teacher49(3): 182–190.
12.
CambourneB (2009) Revisiting the concept of “natural learning”. In: HoffmanJVGoodmanY (eds) Changing Literacies for Changing Times. An Historical Perspective on the Future of Reading Research, Public Policy, and Classroom Practices, New York: Routledge.
13.
CobbPConfreyJdiSessaA (2003) Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher32(1): 9–13.
14.
CobbPJacksonKDunlapC (in press) Design research: An analysis and critique. In: EnglishLKishnerD (eds) Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.
15.
CorbinJStraussA (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
16.
CouseLJChenDW (2010) A tablet computer for young children? Exploring its viability for early childhood education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education43(1): 75–98.
17.
CumminsJ (2000) Language, Power, and Pedagogy: Bilingual Children Caught in the Crossfire, Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
18.
CumminsJ (2007) Rethinking monolingual instructional strategies in multilingual classrooms. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics10: 221–240.
19.
CumminsJ (2012) The intersection of cognitive and sociocultural factors in the development of reading comprehension among immigrant students. Reading and Writing25: 1973–1990.
20.
DysonA (2003) The Brothers and Sisters Learn to Write. Popular Literacies and School Cultures, New York: Teachers College Press.
21.
EspinosaLM (2010) Getting it Right for Young Children from Diverse Backgrounds. Applying Research to Improve Practice, Boston: Pearson.
22.
Flewitt R, Messer D and Kucirkova N (in press) New directions for early literacy in a diigital age: The iPad. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. Epub ahead of print, 20 May 2014. DOI: 10.1177/1468798414533560.
23.
GarcíaOKleifgenJA (2010) Educating Emergent Bilinguals. Policies, Programs, and Practices for English Language Learners, New York: Teachers College Press.
24.
González N, Moll LC and Amanti C (eds) (2009) Funds of Knowledge. Theorizing Practice in Households, Communities, and Classrooms. New York: Routledge.
25.
HarsteJCWoodwardVABurkeCL (1984) Language Stories and Literacy Lessons, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
26.
Hopewell S (2013) Strengthening Bi-literacy through translanguaging pedagogies. In: Dunston PJ, Fullerton SK, Bates CC, et al. (eds) 62nd yearbook of the Literacy Research Association. Altamonte Springs, FL: Literacy Research Association, pp. 234–247.
27.
HornbergerNHLinkH (2012) Translanguaging in today’s classrooms: A biliteracy lens. Theory into Practice51: 239–247.
28.
Jiménez RT, David S, Fagan K, et al. (2015) Using translation to drive conceptual development for students becoming literate in English as an additional language. Research in the Teaching of English 49(3): 248–271.
29.
KennerCRubyM (2013) Connecting children’s worlds: Creating a multilingual syncretic curriculum through partnerships between complementary and mainstream schools. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy13(3): 395–417.
30.
KohnertKYimDNettK (2005) Intervention with linguistically diverse preschool children: A focus on developing home language(s). Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools36: 251–263.
31.
KressG (1997) Before Writing: Rethinking the Paths to Literacy, London: Routledge.
32.
KucirkovaNMesserDSheehyK (2014) The effects of personalization on young children’s spontaneous speech during shared book reading. Journal of Pragmatics71: 45–55.
33.
KucirkovaNMesserDWhitelockD (2010) Sharing personalised books: A practical solution to the challenges posed by home book reading interventions. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal1(3): 186–191.
34.
LabboL (1996) A semiotic analysis of young children’s symbol making in a classroom computer center. Reading Research Quarterly31(4): 356–385.
35.
LeeCD (2006) ‘Every good-bye ain’t gone’: Analyzing the cultural underpinnings of classroom talk. Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education19(3): 305–327.
36.
LynchJRedpathT (2014) “Smart” technologies in early years literacy education: A meta-narrative of paradigmatic tensions in iPad use in an Australian preparatory classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy14(2): 147–174.
37.
MalakoffMHakutaK (1991) Translation skill and metalinguistic awareness in bilinguals. In: BialystokE (ed.) Language Processing in Bilinguals, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Martínez-ÁlvarezPGhisoMPMartínezI (2013) Creative literacies and learning with Latino emergent bilinguals. LEARNing Landscapes Journal11: 273–298.
40.
Martínez-ÁlvarezPGhisoMP (2014) Multilingual, multimodal compositions in technology-mediated hybrid spaces. In: AndersonRSMimsC (eds) Handbook of Research on Digital Tools for Writing Instruction in K-12 Settings, Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 193–218.
41.
MatthewsJSeowP (2007) Electronic paint: Understanding children’s representation through their interactions with digital paint. International Journal of Art and Design Education267(3): 251–263.
42.
MerchantG (2008) Digital writing in the early years. In: CoiroJKnobelMLankshearC (eds) The Handbook of Research on New Literacies, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 751–774.
MollLCAmantiCNeffD (2005) Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. In: GonzálezNMollLCAmantiC (eds) Funds of Knowledge. Theorizing Practices in Households, Communities, and Classrooms, New York: Routledge, pp. 71–87.
45.
MollLCSaezRDworinJ (2001) Exploring biliteracy: Two student case examples of writing as social practice. The Elementary School Journal101(4): 435–449.
46.
MurrayOTOlceseNR (2011) Teaching and learning with iPads, ready or not?TechTrends55(6): 42–48.
47.
Murtha Designs Inc. (2012) Drawing pad (Version 2.3). Available at: http://itunes.apple.com (accessed 12 April 2012).
48.
Murtha Designs Inc. (2014) Drawing Pad (Version 2.5). Available at: http://itunes.apple.com Murtha Designs Inc. (2012) (accessed 20 January 2014).
49.
National Association for the Education of Young Children, & Fred Rogers Center (2012) Technology and Interactive Media as Tools in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth Through Age 8, Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
50.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers (2010) Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects, Washington, DC: Author.
51.
NeumanSBRoskosK (1991) Peers as literacy informants: A description of young children's literacy conversations in play. Early Childhood Research Quarterly6: 233–248.
52.
Neumann MM and Neumann DL (2013) Touch screen tablets and emergent literacy. Early Childhood Education Journal. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1007/s10643-013-0608-3.
53.
Neumann MM and Neumann DL (2014) Touch screen tablets and emergent literacy. Early Childhood Education Journal 42(4): 231–239.
54.
NietoS (2009) Language, Culture, and Teaching: Critical Perspectives, New York: Routledge.
55.
OrellanaMFReynoldsJF (2008) Cultural modeling: Leveraging bilingual skills for school paraphrasing tasks. Reading Research Quarterly43(1): 48–65.
56.
PiagetJ (1962) Play, Dreams, and Imitation in Childhood, New York: W. W. Norton.
57.
PrinslooM (2005) The new literacies as placed resources. Perspectives in Education23(4): 87–98.
58.
PuzioKKeyesCSColeMW (2013) Language differentiation: Collaborative translation to support bilingual reading. Bilingual Research Journal36(3): 329–349.
59.
RayKWGloverM (2008) Already Ready. Nurturing Writers in Preschool and Kindergarten, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
60.
Red Jumper Studio (2013) Book Creator for iPad (Version 2.5). Available at: http://itunes.apple.com (accessed 25 March 2013).
61.
Red Jumper Studio (2014) Book Creator for iPad (Version 3.0.2). Available at: http://itunes.apple.com (accessed 16 April 2014).
62.
ReinkingDBradleyBA (2004) Connecting research and practice using formative and design experiments. In: DukeNKMalletteM (eds) Literacy Research Methodologies, New York: Guilford Press, pp. 149–169.
63.
RoweDW (1994) Preschoolers as Authors: Literacy Learning in the Social World of the Classroom, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
64.
RoweDW (2008) The social construction of intentionality: Two-year-olds’ and adults’ participation at a preschool writing center. Research in the Teaching of English42(4): 387–434.
65.
RoweDWFlushmanTR (2013) Best practices in early writing instruction. In: BaroneDMalletteM (eds) Best Practices in Early Literacy Instruction, New York: Guilford Press, pp. 224–250.
66.
RoweDWMillerMEPachecoMB (2014) Preschoolers as digital designers: Composing dual language eBooks using touchscreen computer tablets. In: AndersonRSMimsC (eds) Handbook of Research on Digital Tools for Writing Instruction in K-12 Settings, Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, pp. 279–306.
67.
RoweDWNeitzelC (2010) Interest and agency in two- and three-year-olds’ participation in emergent writing. Reading Research Quarterly45(2): 169–195.
68.
Rowe DW and Wilson S (in press) The development of a descriptive measure of early childhood writing: Results from the Write Start! Writing Assessment. Journal of Literacy Research.
69.
RowsellJSaudelliMGScottRM (2013) iPads as placed resources: Forging community in online and offline spaces. Language Arts90(5): 351–360.
70.
SandovalWA (2004) Developing learning theory by refining conjectures embodied in educational designs. Educational Psychologist39(4): 213–223.
71.
SiegelM (1995) More than words: The generative power of transmediation for learning. Canadian Journal of Education20(4): 455–475.
72.
SiegelM (2012) New times for multimodality? Confronting the accountability culture. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy55(8): 671–680.
73.
SiegelMKontovourkiSSchmierS (2008) Literacy in motion: A case study of a shape-shifting kindergarterner. Language Arts86(2): 89–98.
Souto-ManningM (2010) Challenging ethnocentric literacy practices: (Re)Positioning home literacies in a Head Start classroom. Research in the Teaching of English45(2): 150–178.
76.
Teale W and Sulzby E (eds) (1986) Emergent Literacy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
77.
TomaselloM (2008) Origins of Human Communication, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Souto-Manning M and Felderman CB (2013) Negotiating critical literacies: Toward full inclusion in early childhood classrooms. In: Vasquez V and Wood J (eds), Perspectives and provocations in early childhood education. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, Inc., pp. 21–34.
