This paper explores an inhuman reading of ‘hands’ with/in visual images of a Finnish literacy lesson. Inspired by Karen Barad’s agential realism and the ontological turn, we disrupt a metaphysics of presence, the temporality of progress and binary logic, to reconfigure the child in literacy practices as a sympoietic phenomenon, always already assembled in human and more-than-human company. We think with/in the concept of ‘touch’ as a method to reconfigure literacies as inhuman. We adopt Tsing’s (2015) art of noticing and present four ‘unruly’ encounters, touching surprising entanglements that e/merge when learning to ‘look around rather than ahead’. We notice entanglements of hand/writing, snow, flows of capitalism, mobile phones and a cardboard representation for our rethinking of literacies without assuming development and progress. Based on our analysis, we propose that moving away from identity, human exceptionalism and judging children on individual literacy achievement according to benchmarks that are external to the learning process itself renders learners capable in literacy practices.
AapalaK (2019) Sanojen alkuperästä (On the origin of words). Available at: www.kotus.fi (accessed 21 May 2019).
2.
AndersPLYadenDBDa Silva IddingsAC, et al. (2016)
Entanglements, intensities, and becoming: Non-representational perspectives on literacy research. Journal of Literacy Research48(3): 255–257.
3.
BaradK (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
4.
BaradK (2011)
Nature’s Queer performativity. Qui parle19(2): 121–158.
BoldtGMLeanderK (2017)
Becoming through “the break”: A post-human account of a child’s play. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy17(3): 409–425.
10.
BraidottiR (2009)
Animals, anomalies, and inorganic others. PMLA124(2): 526–532.
11.
BraidottiR (2010) The politics of “life itself” and new ways of dying. In: CooleDHFrostS (eds) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics.
Durham, NC and London:
Duke University Press, pp.201–220.
12.
BraidottiR (2013) The Posthuman.
Cambridge:
Polity Press.
13.
BraidottiR (2019)
A theoretical framework for the critical humanities. Theory, Culture & Society 36(6): 31–61.
14.
BurnettCMerchantGPahlK, et al. (2014)
The (im)materiality of literacy: The significance of subjectivity to new literacies research.Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education35(1): 90–103.
15.
BurnettCMerchantG (2016)
Boxes of poison: Baroque technique as antidote to simple views of literacy. Journal of Literacy Research48(3): 258–279.
16.
ColemanRRingroseJ (2013) Introduction: Deleuze and research methodologies. In: ColemanRRingroseJ (eds) Deleuze and Research Methodologies. Deleuze Connections.
Edinburgh:
Edinburgh University Press, pp.1–22.
17.
DeleuzeG (1986) Cinema 1: The Movement-image (Tomlinson H and Habberjam B, Trans.).
London:
The Athlone Press.
18.
DeleuzeGGuattariF (2014) A Thousand Plateaus (Massumi B, Trans.).
Minneapolis, MN:
University of Minnesota Press (Original work published 1980).
19.
DinehartLH (2015)
Handwriting in early childhood education: Current research and future implications. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy15(1): 97–118.
20.
EhretCHollettTJociusR (2016)
The matter of new media making: An intra-action analysis of adolescents making a digital book trailer. Journal of Literacy Research48(3): 346–377.
21.
Finnish National Board of Education (FNBE) (2009) National Core Curriculum for Instruction Preparing for Basic Education 2009.
Helsinki:
FNBE.
22.
Finnish National Board of Education (FNBE) (2014) National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014.
Helsinki:
FNBE.
23.
Finnish National Board of Education (FNBE) (2015) Perusopetukseen Valmistavan Opetuksen Opetussuunnitelman Perusteet (Core Curriculum for Instruction Preparing for Basic Education).
Helsinki:
FNBE.
24.
FuchsC (2014) Digital Labour and Karl Marx.
New York:
Routledge.
25.
GiorzaT (2018) Making kin and taking care: Intra-active learning with time, space and matter in a Johannesburg preschool. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
26.
HackettASomervilleM (2017)
Posthuman literacies: Young children moving in time, place and more-than-human worlds.Journal of Early Childhood Literacy17(3): 374–391.
27.
HarawayD (2016) Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene.
Durham, NC and London:
Duke University Press.
28.
IngoldT (2015) The Life of Lines.
New York:
Routledge.
29.
JacksonAYMazzeiLA (2012) Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research: Viewing Data Across Multiple Perspectives.
London:
Routledge.
30.
JamesKHEngelhardtL (2012)
The effects of handwriting on functional brain development in pre-literate children.Trends in Neuroscience and Education1(1): 32–42.
31.
Jokinen P and Nordstrom S (forthcoming) A queer cyborg ethnographer in the performative friction of dissenting ontologies. Qualitative Inquiry.
KaikkonenVAMäkynenAJ (2016)
A high sampling rate digital holographic imager instrument for the in situ measurements of hydrometeors. Optical Review23(3): 493–501.
KromidasM (2014)
The ‘savage’ child and the nature of race: Posthuman interventions from New York City. Anthropological Theory14(4): 422–441.
36.
KubyCR (2017)
Why a paradigm shift of ‘more than human ontologies’ is needed: Putting to work poststructural and posthuman theories in writers’ studio.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education30(9): 877–896.
37.
KubyCRRowsellJ (2017)
Early literacy and the posthuman: Pedagogies and methodologies. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy17(3): 285–296.
38.
KubyCRSpectorKThielJJ (2019) Posthumanism and Literacy Education: Knowing/Becoming/Doing Literacies.
New York:
Routledge.
39.
LakoffGJohnsonM (1980) Metaphors We Live By.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
40.
LeanderKBoldtDG (2013)
Rereading “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies” bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research45(1): 22–46.
41.
LentersK (2016)
Riding the lines and overwriting in the margins: Affect and multimodal literacy practices. Journal of Literacy Research48(3): 280–316.
42.
Lenz TaguchiH (2010) Going Beyond the Theory/Practice Divide in Early Childhood Education: Introducing an Intra-active Pedagogy.
London:
Routledge.
43.
Lenz TaguchiHSt. PierreEA (2017)
Using concept as method in educational and social science inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry23(9): 643–648.
44.
MacLureM (2013)
Researching without representation? Language and materiality in postqualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education26(6): 658–667.
45.
ManningE (2013) Always More than One: Individuation’s Dance.
Durham, NC and London:
Duke University Press.
46.
MassumiB (2015) The Politics of Affect.
Cambridge:
Polity Press.
47.
MerchantG (2017) Hands, fingers and iPads. In: BurnettCMerchantGSimpsonAWalshM (eds) The Case of the iPad. Mobile Literacies in Education.
Singapore:
Springer, pp.245–256.
48.
Miller JW and McKenna MC (2016) World Literacy: How Countries Rank And Why It Matters. New York: Routledge.
49.
MurrisK (2016) The Posthuman Child: Educational Transformation through Philosophy with Picturebooks.
New York:
Routledge.
50.
MurrisK (2019)
Children’s development, capability approaches and postdevelopmental child: The birth to four curriculum in South Africa. Global Studies of Childhood9(1): 56–71.
51.
MurrisKHaynesJ (2018) Literacies, Literature and Learning: Reading Classrooms Differently.
London and New York:
Routledge Research Monographs Series.
52.
MurrisKBabamiaS (2018) Bodies with legs: ‘Fidgeting’ and how recording practices matter. In: MurrisKHaynesJ (eds) Literacies, Literature and Learning: Reading Classrooms Differently.
London and New York:
Routledge Research Monographs Series, pp.110–121.
53.
MurrisKBozalekV (2019)
Diffracting diffractive readings of texts as methodology: Some propositions.Educational Philosophy and Theory51(14): 1504–1517.
54.
New London Group (1996)
A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review66(1): 60–92.
55.
PaakkariARautioP (2018) ‘
What is puberty, then?’ Smartphones and Tumblr images as de/re-territorialisations in an upper secondary school.Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education40(6): 873–888.
56.
PallasmaaJ (2017)
Embodied and existential wisdom in architecture: The thinking hand. Body & Society23(1): 96–111.
57.
PallasmaaJ (2005) The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses.
Chichester, West Sussex:
John Wiley & Sons.
58.
PatersonM (2009)
Haptic geographies: Ethnography, haptic knowledges and sensuous dispositions. Progress in Human Geography33(6): 766–788.
59.
PedersenH (2010) Animals in Schools: Processes and Strategies in Human-Animal Education.
West Lafayette, IN:
Purdue University Press.
60.
SinghJ (2018) Unthinking Mastery: Dehumanism and Decolonial Entanglements.
Durham, NC and London:
Duke University Press.
61.
SomervilleM (2013)
Place, storylines and the social practices of literacy. Literacy47(1): 10–16.
62.
ThielJJ (2015)
Vibrant matter: The intra-active role of objects in the construction of young children’s literacies.Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice64: 112–131.
63.
ThielJJJonesS (2017)
The literacies of things: Reconfiguring the material-discursive production of race and class in an informal learning centre. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy17(3): 315–335.
64.
TrumanS (2019)
Inhuman literacies and affective refusals: Thinking with Sylvia Wynter and secondary school English. Curriculum Inquiry49(1): 110–128.
65.
TuomaalaS (2004) Työtätekevistä käsistä puhtaiksi ja kirjoittaviksi. Suomalaisen oppivelvollisuuskoulun ja maalaislasten kohtaaminen 1921-1939 (From working hands to clean and writing hands. Encounters between Finnish compulsory education and rural children 1921–1939). Doctoral Dissertation. Bibliotheca Historica. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
66.
TsingAL (2015) The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
WohlwendKEPepplerKAKeuneA, et al. (2017)
Making sense and nonsense: Comparing mediated discourse and agential realist approaches to materiality in a preschool makerspace. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy17(3): 444–462.
