Education is in the process of transforming traditional print-based instruction into digital formats. This multi-case study sheds light on the challenge of coping with the old and new in literacy teaching in the context of technology-mediated instruction in the early years of schooling (7–8 years old children). By investigating the relation between literacy and digital technology in diverse pedagogical contexts we capture the complexity in the educational transformation that needs to be acknowledged. Each of the cases demonstrates a distinct knowledge focus and goal for early literacy instruction, organisation and access around technology and what is made visible in instruction. All these factors had consequences for the teaching that occurred. Depending on epistemological beliefs, digital competencies were taught separately from literacy and considered as a goal on its own or integrated with literacy considered as a means and a goal for literacy teaching and learning. Implicit pedagogy with weaker classification and framing enabled conditions for infused approaches making use of digital technology in multimodal, functional and learner centred literacy practices. Furthermore, initial guidance and the weaving of invisible and visible pedagogy highlight a possible way to both exploit the potential of digital technology and support children from various backgrounds. The balance of teacher and student control was further affected in regard to the organisation of technology and choices of pedagogical methods. This research hereby expands the current discussion on the relation between technology and literacy with an understanding that the epistemological focus and context of practices are necessary tools to problematize, rather than measure or value, emerging practices in early literacy instruction. We conclude that in addition to the necessary heavy investments in digital technology in schools there is a need to provide room for action for the teachers and address issues of purpose, pedagogy and organisation around technology.
AnsteyMBullG (2006) Teaching and Learning Multiliteracies: Changing Times, changing Literacies, Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
2.
Bangert-DrownsRL (1993) The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction. Review of Educational Research63(1): 69–93.
3.
BearneE (2003) Rethinking literacy: Communication, representation, and text. Reading Literacy and Language37(3): 98–103.
4.
BernsteinB (1990) The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. Volume IV. Class, Codes and Control, London: Routledge.
5.
BernsteinB (2000) Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity. Theory, Research, Critique, (rev. edn). Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
6.
BernsteinB (2003) Social class and pedagogic practice. In: BernsteinB (ed.) The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. Vol. IV: Class, Codes and Control, London: Routledge, pp. 63–93.
7.
BuchananRAHolmesKAPrestonGD (2012) Basic literacy or new literacies? Examining the contradictions of Australia’s education revolution. Australian Journal of Teacher Education37: 97–110.
8.
BurnettC (2010) Technology and literacy in early childhood educational settings: A review of research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy10(3): 247–270.
9.
CarpentierN (2011) Media and Participation, Bristol, UK: Intellect.
10.
CartwrightVHammondM (2007) ’Fitting it in’: A study exploring ICT use in a UK primary school. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (Online Edition)23(3): 390–407.
11.
ChomskyC (1982) Write now, read later. In: Cazden (ed.) Language in Early Childhood Education, Washington: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
12.
ChungYWalshHD (2006) Constructing a joint story-writing space: The dynamics of young children’s collaboration at computers. Early Education and Development17(3): 373–420.
13.
ClayM (1975) What did I Write? Beginning Writing Behaviour, New Zealand: Heinemann.
14.
Cochran-SmithM (1991) Word-processing and writing in elementary classrooms: A critical review of related literature. Review of Educational Research61: 107–155.
15.
CoiroJKnobelMLankshearC (2008) Central issues in new literacies and new literacies research. In: CoiroJKnobelMLankshearC (eds) Handbook of Research on New Literacies, New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.
CopeBKalantzisM (2000) Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures, London: Routledge.
17.
CopeBKalantzisMMcCartheyS (2011) Technology-mediated writing assessments: Principles and processes. Computers and Composition28: 79–96.
18.
Cutrim SchmidE (2011) Video-stimulated reflection as a professional development tool in interactive whiteboard research. ReCALL23: 252–270.
19.
DavisAMcGrailE (2009) “Proof-revising” with podcasting: keeping readers in mind as students listen to and rethink their writing. Reading Teacher62(6): 522–529.
20.
ErixonP-O (2010) School subject paradigms and teaching practice in lower secondary Swedish schools influenced by ICT and media. Computers and Education54: 1212–1221.
21.
ExleyBRichard-BossezA (2013) The ABCs of teaching alphabet knowledge: Affordances and challenges of ‘weaving’ visible and invisible pedagogies. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood14(4): 345–356.
22.
FleischerH (2012) What is our current understanding of one-to-one computer projects: A systematic narrative research review. Educational Research Review7(2): 107–122.
23.
Fleischer H (2013) En elev – en dator: kunskapsbildningens kvalitet och villkor i den datoriserade skolan [One student – one computer. The quality of and conditions for knowledge formation in the digitalised school.]. Dissertation Series No. 21. School of Education and Communication, Joünkoüping University.
Freebody P and Luke A (1990) Literacies programs: Debates and demands in cultural context. Prospect: An Australian Journal of TESOL 5(3): 7–16.
26.
GeeJP (2003) What Video Games have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
GilbertDChenHLSabolJ (2008) Building learning communities with wikis. In: CummingsRBartonM (eds) Wiki Writing: Collaborative Learning in the College Classroom, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 71–89.
28.
GoldbergARussellMCookA (2003) The effect of computers on students writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment2(1): 1–24.
29.
Groünlund H, Englund T, Andersson A, et al. (2011) Årsrapport Unosuno 2011. [Annual Report Unosuno 2011.] Örebro University.
30.
HasanR (2002) Ways of meaning, ways of learning: Code as an explanatory concept. British Journal of Sociology of Education23(4): 537–548.
31.
HeathSBStreetB (2008) On Ethnography: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
32.
HoadleyU (2006) Analysing pedagogy: the problem of framing. Journal of Education40: 15–34.
33.
HullGSchultzK (2002) Schools Out!: Bridging out-of-school Literacies with Classroom Practice, New York, NY: Teachers College press.
34.
HyunEDavisG (2005) Kindergartners’ conversations in a computer-based technology classroom. Communication Education54(2): 118–135.
35.
IngramNR (2014) Time past: impacts of ICT on the pedagogic discourse in the Interactive project. Technology, Pedagogy and Education. DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2014.972440.
36.
Ivanič R, Edwards R, Satchwell C, et al. (2007) Possibilities for pedagogy in further education: Harnessing the abundance of literacy. British Educational Research Journal 33(5): 703–721.
37.
JedeskogGNissenJ (2004) ICT in the classroom: Is doing more important than knowing?Education and Information Technologies9(1): 37–45.
38.
JenkinsHClintonKPurushotmaR (2006) Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century, Chicago: The MacArthur Foundation.
39.
JenkinsHFordSGreenJ (2013) Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture, New York: New York University Press.
40.
JewittCBezemerJJonesKEN (2009) Changing English? The impact of technology and policy on a school subject in the 21st century. English Teaching: Practice and Critique8(3): 8–20.
41.
Kovacic A, Bubas G and Zlatovic M (2007) Evaluation of activities with a wiki system in teaching English as a second language. In: Proceedings of the international conference “ICT for language learning”, Florence, Italy, 20–21 September 2007.
42.
KressG (2003) Literacy in the New Media Age, London: Routledge.
43.
KressG (2010) Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication, London: Routledge.
44.
LabboLDReinkingD (2003) Computers and early literacy education. In: HallNLarsonJMarschJ (eds) Handbook of Early Literacy Education, London: Sage.
45.
LambB (2004) Wide open spaces: Wikis, ready or not. Educause Review39(5): 36–48.
46.
LangerJ (2003) Effective literacy instruction: Building successful reading and writing programs. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy46(8): 705–707.
47.
LankshearCKnobelM (2006) New Literacies: Everyday Practices and Classroom Learning, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Open University Press and McGraw Hill.
48.
LankshearCKnobelM (2007) Sampling “the new” in new literacies. In: LankshearCKnobelM (eds) A New Literacies Sampler, New York, NY: Peter Lang.
49.
LeuDJ JrKinzerCKCoiroJL (2004) Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In: RuddellRBUnrauN (eds) Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
50.
LincolnYSGubaEG (1986) But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation30: 73–84.
51.
LowtherDLRossSMMorrisonGM (2003) When each one has one: The influences on teaching strategies and student achievement of using laptops in the classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development51(3): 23–44.
52.
LyleJ (2003) Stimulated recall: A report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal29(6): 861–878.
53.
LynchJRedpathT (2014) ‘Smart’ technologies in early years literacy education: A meta-narrative of paradigmatic tensions in iPad use in an Australian preparatory classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy14(2): 147–174.
54.
MakBConiamD (2008) Using wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in Hong Kong. System36(3): 437–455.
55.
MalmgrenLG (1996) Svenskundervisningen i grundskolan [Instruction in the subject of Swedish in primary school], Lund: Studentlitteratur.
56.
MarshJ (2006) Emergent media literacy: Digital animation in early childhood. Language and Education20(6): 493–506.
57.
McCormick CalkinsL (1994) The Art of Teaching Writing, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
58.
McCormick Calkins L (2001) The Art of Teaching Reading. New York: Longman.
59.
McPakeJPlowmanLStephenC (2013) Pre-school children creating and communicating with digital technologies in the home. British Journal of Educational Technology44(3): 421–431.
60.
MerchantG (2008) Digital writing in the early years. In: CoiroJKnobelMLankshearC (eds) Handbook of Research on New Literacies, New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
61.
MoraisAM (2002) Basil Bernstein at the microlevel of the classroom. British Journal of Sociology of Education23(4): 559–569.
62.
MoraisAMNevesIP (2001) Pedagogic social contexts: Studies for a sociology of learning. In: MoraisANevesIDaviesB (eds) Towards a Sociology of Pedagogy: The Contribution of Basil Bernstein to Research, New York, NY: Peter Lang, pp. 185–221.
63.
MoraisAMNevesIP (2011) Educational texts and contexts that work: Discussing the optimization of a model of pedagogic practice. In: FrandjiDVitaleP (eds) Knowledge, Pedagogy & Society: International Perspectives on Basil Bernstein's Sociology of Education, London: Routledge, pp. 191–207.
64.
MulcahyCM (2010) Marginalized Literacies. Critical Literacy in the Language Arts Classroom. Contemporary Research in Education, Charlotte, NC: Information Age Pub.
65.
New London Group (1996) A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harward Educational Review66(1): 60–92.
66.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005) Definition and Selection of Key Competencies, OECD Publishing.
PelletierJReeveRHalewoodC (2006) Young children’s knowledge building and literacy development through knowledge forum. Early Education and Development17(3): 323–346.
69.
PenrodD (2007) Using Blogs to Enhance Literacy: The Next Powerful Step in 21st-Century Learning, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
70.
PenuelW (2006) Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education38(3): 329–348.
71.
RussellMBebellDHigginsJ (2004) Laptop learning: A comparison of teaching and learning in upper elementary classrooms equipped with shared carts of laptops and permanent 1:1 laptops. Journal of Educational Computing Research30(4): 313–330.
72.
SahlströmF (2008) Från lärare till elever, från undervisning till lärande: utvecklingslinjer i svensk, nordisk och internationell klassrumsforskning [From teacher to student, from teaching to learning: trends in Swedish, Nordic and international classroom research], Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
73.
SchillerJTillettB (2004) Using digital images with young children: Challenges of integration. Early Child Development and Care174(4): 401.
74.
Selwyn N (1999) Differences in educational computer use: The influence of subject cultures. The Curriculum Journal 10(1): 29–48.
75.
ShentonAK (2004) Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information22(2): 63–75.
76.
SiegelMKontorourkiSSchmierS (2008) Literacy in motion: A case study of a shape-shifting kindergartener. Language Arts86(2): 89–98.
77.
SilvermanD (2006) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction, 3rd [updated.] ed. London: Sage.
78.
SilvernailDLLaneML (2004) The Impact of Maine’s One-to-one Laptop Program on Middle School Teachers and Students, Portland, MA: Maine Education Policy Research Institute, University of Southern Maine Office.
Smith SC (2013) Classroom interaction and pedagogic practice: A Bernsteinian analysis. International Journal of Sociology of Education 2(3): 263–291.
81.
Sofkova HashemiS (2013) Wiki-mediated Writing: design, media, writing strategies and feedback in online text production. Acta Didactica Norge7(1): Art. 8: 1–21.
82.
StreetB (2003) What’s “new” in the new literacy studies: Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education5: 77–91.
83.
SuhrKAHernandezDAGrimesD (2010) Laptops and fourth-grade literacy: Assisting the jump over the fourth-grade slump. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment9(5): : 5–45. Available at: http://www.jtla.org.
84.
TakalaM (2013) Teaching reading through writing. Support for Learning28(1): 17–23.
85.
TaylorLKBernhardJKGargS (2008) Affirming plural belonging: Building on students’ family-based cultural and linguistic capital through multiliteracies pedagogy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy8(3): 269–294.
86.
TealeWGambrellL (2007) Raising urban students’ literacy achievement by engaging in authentic, challenging work. Reading Teacher60(8): 728–739.
87.
ThomasM (2011) Digital Education. Opportunities for Social Collaboration, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
88.
TorgersonCZhuD (2004) Evidence for the effectiveness of ICT on literacy learning. In: AndrewsR (ed.) The Impact of ICT on Literacy, London: Routledge Falmer, pp. 34–68.
89.
Trageton A (2003) Creative writing on computers, Grade 1–4: Writing to Read. In: 13th European conference on reading ,Tallin, Estonia, 6–9 July 2003.
90.
TrondmanM (2008) Bypass surgery: Rerouting theory to ethnographic study. In: WalfordG (ed.) How to do Educational Ethnography, London: Tufnell Press, pp. 115–139.
91.
UnsworthL (2001) Teaching Multiliteracies across the Curriculum: Changing Contexts of Text and Image in Classroom Practice, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
92.
UnsworthL (2006) Towards a metalanguage for multiliteracies education: Describing the meaning-making resources of language-image interactions. English Teaching: Practice and Critique5.1: 55–76.
93.
ValienteO (2010) 1-1 in education: Current practice, international comparative research evidence and policy implications. OECD education working papers 44, OECD Publishing.
94.
WagnerT (2008) The Global Achievement Gap: Why even Our Best Schools Don’t Teach the New Survival Skills Our Children Need, and What We can do About It, New York, NY: Basic Books.
95.
WalfordG (2008) How to do Educational Ethnography, London: Tufnell Press.
96.
WalshCS (2007) Creativity as capital: Youth as multimodal designers. Literacy2(41): 79–86.
97.
WarschauerM (2008) Laptops and literacy: A multi-site case study. Pedagogies: An International Journal3: 52–67.
98.
WarschauerM (2010) Invited commentary: New tools for teaching writing. Language Learning and Technology14(1): 3–8.
WarschauerMWareP (2008) Learning, change and power: competing frames of technology and literacy. In: CoiroJKnobelMLankshearC (eds) Handbook of Research on New Literacies, New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
101.
YinRK (2012) Applications of Case Study Research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
